Once Upon a Time, the DOJ Argued the Presidential Records Act Gave a President Massive Authority Over His Records

[Skylar]

Do you know who Beria was?

The process has been co-opted by one party, and you cheer it on while pretending it isn't happening.

The evidence says otherwise. Read the indictment. Its quite damning.

 

[Skylar]

You idiots have been combing the desert for Trump shit since 2016. Please don't pretend otherwise.

And there's overwhelming evidence Trump committed serious felonies.

You're avoiding the evidence like it was on fire.

 

[martybegan]

The evidence says otherwise. Read the indictment. Its quite damning.

You find anything against Trump "Quite Damning"

Even the bullshit in NY.

 

[martybegan]

And there's overwhelming evidence Trump committed serious felonies.

You're avoiding the evidence like it was on fire.

Any viewpoint you have on said evidence is moot because you just want Trump taken out, and you don't care how.

 

[Skylar]

You find anything against Trump "Quite Damning"

Even the bullshit in NY.

Not even this?

Even by your normal 'Judge Dredd' nonsense, where you offer us your personal opinion as the only legal standard......that's damning.

 

[martybegan]

View attachment 795795

Not even this?

Even by your normal 'Judge Dredd' nonsense, where you offer us your personal opinion as the only legal standard......that's damning.

Where's the rest of it?

And if the Presidential Records Act has any say in this, he may be wrong about it himself.

 

[Skylar]

Where's the rest of it?

And if the Presidential Records Act has any say in this, he may be wrong about it himself.

Laughing.....so we have to ignore TRUMP now too?

You're kinda taking your subjectification of the law to a silly degree, Marty. You get that *none* of us are bound to your personal opinion, yes? No court, grand jury, no prosecutor, no judge. No one.

So what's the point of you offering your personal opinion as the law, when your personal opinion will have no relevance to any legal outcome?

 

[martybegan]

Laughing.....so we have to ignore TRUMP now too?

You're kinda taking your subjectification of the law to a silly degree, Marty. You get that *none* of us are bound to your personal opinion, yes? No court, grand jury, no prosecutor, no judge. No one.

So what's the point of you offering your personal opinion as the law, when your personal opinion will have no relevance to any legal outcome?

When the DOJ indicts Biden, Hillary and others who kept documents or in Hillary's case electronic versions, then I will take this seriously. Until then it's a political witch hunt.

 

[Skylar]

When the DOJ indicts Biden, Hillary and others who kept documents or in Hillary's case electronic versions, then I will take this seriously.

Trump wasn't charged for ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Pence wasn't charged for ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Hillary wasn't charged for ANY of the classified info she returned.

Biden wasn't charged ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Its perfectly consistent.

Until then it's a political witch hunt.

Nah, you're just demanding a legal double standard. Where Trump isn't charged for the document he returned. But Biden, Pence and Hillary must be charged for returning documents?

Um, no. Of course we're not doing that.

We're applying the same standard to everyone.

 

[martybegan]

Trump wasn't charged for ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Pence wasn't charged for ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Hillary wasn't charged for ANY of the classified info she returned.

Biden wasn't charged ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Its perfectly consistent.



Nah, you're just demanding a legal double standard. Where Trump isn't charged for the document he returned. But Biden, Pence and Hillary must be charged for returning documents?

Um, no. Of course we're not doing that.

The crime was having them, or so they say.

But keep trying to absolve your butt buddies.

 

[Skylar]

The crime was having them, or so they say.

No one, including Trump, was charged for classified documents they returned.

You're demanding a legal double standard. Where Trump never been charged for the documents he returned, but Biden, Hillary and Pence be charged for the documents they returned.

No. We're not implementing your double standard. We'll be applying the same standard to everyone.

 

[martybegan]

No one, including Trump, was charged for classified documents they returned.

You're demanding a legal double standard. Where Trump never been charged for the documents he returned, but Biden, Hillary and Pence be charged for the documents they returned.

No. We're not implementing your double standard. We'll be applying the same standard to everyone.

So he still has documents?

Or more appropriately copies of documents.

You are excusing political witch hunts because you don't like this particular witch.

 

[Billo_Really]

Not long ago, in what is a seminal court case, involving Bill Clinton, the DOJ sided with Clinton.

Jack Smith, the buffoon that he is, ignored this in his vendetta against Trump.

Lawyer Who Lost Clinton "Socks Case" in 2012 Defends President Trump's Actions | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo

President Trump's 14th Amendment rights are being trampled on. No, we're not talking about the "insurrection" clause that the highly-partisan "Jan 6 Committee" of Pelosi's 116th Congress likes to tout as an inhibition against President Trump being able to seek re-election, even though no Jan 6...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

This has nothing to do with the Presidential Records Act! An ex-President does not have a right to keep current battle plans against Iran. What ******* brain dead idiot would think he has a right to that documentation when he is no longer President?

Nothing, I resort to reports that you file to your masters.

Of coarse, like the kiss-ass ***** you are, you can't back up your claim!

 

[Skylar]

So he still has documents?

Who is 'he' in your legal double standard?

Trump, the one that you insist should NEVER be charged for classified documents he returned?

Or Biden, Pence and Hillary, who you insist should ALWAYS be charged for the classified documents they returned?

I've got a better idea: Let's apply the same standard to everyone. Exactly as the DOJ did.

 

[Skylar]

This has nothing to do with the Presidential Records Act! An ex-President does not have a right to keep current battle plans against Iran. What ******* brain dead idiot would think he has a right to that documentation when he is no longer President?

Of coarse, like the kiss-ass ***** you are, you can't back up your claim!

Their argument is the dumbest shit imaginable:

That classified national security docs were Trump's 'personal records."

Good ******* luck with that one in court.

 

[BackAgain]

I know right, they should instead be like you and have some talking head tell them what to think about the indictment since you are not intelligent enough to read it for yourself and understand it

Projection.

 

[martybegan]

Who is 'he' in your legal double standard?

Trump, the one that you insist should NEVER be charged for classified documents he returned?

Or Biden, Pence and Hillary, who you insist should ALWAYS be charged for the classified documents they returned?

I've got a better idea: Let's apply the same standard to everyone. Exactly as the DOJ did.

Trump. does he still have the copies or not?

Returning them doesn't mean they should be absolved of having them.

Hell returning them is them admitting they shouldn't have had them.

Hillary is still free and not charged on the server fuckup, so no, there is no single standard.

 

[Skylar]

Trump. does he still have the copies or not?

Copies of what? The classified document he returned in response to a subpoena from the NARA?

And Trump wasn't charged for?

Or the classified documents Trump refuse to return, the document he lied to authorities abvout, compelled others to lie about, hid, compelled his lawyers to lie about, and he showed to other people.

That Trump *was* charged for?

Hell returning them is them admitting they shouldn't have had them.

So Trump returning classified docs is Trump admitting he shouldn't have them?

Laughing.....you making up a NEW double standard to go with your OLD double standard, Marty?

 

[martybegan]

Copies of what? The classified document he returned in response to a subpoena from the NARA?

And Trump wasn't charged for?

Or the classified documents Trump refuse to return, the document he lied to authorities abvout, compelled others to lie about, hid, compelled his lawyers to lie about, and he showed to other people.

That Trump *was* charged for?



So Trump returning classified docs is Trump admitting he shouldn't have them?

Laughing.....you making up a NEW double standard to go with your OLD double standard, Marty?

If everything was applied equally, yes. But it isn't.

The funny thing is I'm the only one asking questions, you pretend you know everything when half the shit we know about this supposition and guesswork.

 

[Skylar]

If everything was applied equally, yes. But it isn't.

Of course it is.

Trump wasn't charged for ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Pence wasn't charged for ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Hillary wasn't charged for ANY of the classified info she returned.

Biden wasn't charged ANY of the classified documents he returned.

Its perfectly consistent.

You're demanding a legal double standard. Um, no.