Of course left wing Justices are taking trips with billionaires....democrats only mention conservative justices...

[pknopp]

what was unethical about this? until you can. point to something you got nothing

Obviously you simply aren't paying attention. I can't help you to do that.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

I hear Robert's hung out with epstein

 

[struth]

Obviously you simply aren't paying attention. I can't help you to do that.

so that’s a no you can’t

gotcha

 

[pknopp]

so that’s a no you can’t

gotcha

I already said I can't help you pay attention. Perhaps a professional is needed.

 

[2aguy]

And the difference is those justices reported the trips as they are required to do.

Read the quote again, you moron....

Despite the fact that liberal justices hold the records for most trips in a given year in recent memory, and the most trips in a 14-year period,

and they've failed to disclose reimbursed travel expenses in the past, and have enjoyed trips covered by individuals who've done business before the Supreme Court,

it's only conservative justices who face calls to resign. Funny how that works, eh?

 

[struth]

I already said I can't help you pay attention. Perhaps a professional is needed.

i’m just asking you to tell us what was done that was unethical

 

[pknopp]

i’m just asking you to tell us what was done that was unethical

Pay attention. It's been posted here in many threads.

 

[struth]

Pay attention. It's been posted here in many threads.

then it should be easy for you

 

[Kilroy2]

The thread does only refer to liberal judges and does not mention conservative judges. That is my issue when only one side of the story is mentioned.

yet there are unbiased or nonpartisan stores that mentions both sides.

Supreme Court Justices Earn Free Trips and More on the Side

Six of the court’s nine members received paid trips to Europe in 2014

time.com

 

[struth]

The thread does only refer to liberal judges and does not mention conservative judges. That is my issue when only one side of the story is mentioned.

yet there are unbiased or nonpartisan stores that mentions both sides.

Supreme Court Justices Earn Free Trips and More on the Side

Six of the court’s nine members received paid trips to Europe in 2014

time.com

What’s wrong with anything mentioned in the article?