This despicable woman had three special needs children when she went back for another round of IVF. Aside from her conduct, which ought to have been criminal, there's the conduct of the fertility doctor and the sperm donor to consider. How can it possibly be ethical to implant fertilized eggs in a woman with this kind of background?
And BTW, it'd be nice to get a straight answer as to how these IVF treatments were funded. I suspect her doctor did them on the cheap or for free for his 15 minutes of fame...if so, he should be looked at criminally as well. Pisses me off that the state medical association has made no move on his license, nor installed any ethical limits on the acts of fertility doctors.
I guess the litter of eight is about a year and a half old now; I would imagine there will be more diagnoses of autism, etc. among them. If Suleman had deliberately injured a fetus by doing drugs, etc. during her pregnancy, many states would swoop in to take the baby and might even prosecute her. I see no difference between that fact pat and Suleman's, knowing the babies had no chance of being full term and the odds they'd be severely damaged were sky high.
What this whole gang needs is not a welfare check; it's prison time.
