Bones
VIP Member
- Dec 27, 2010
- 344
- 86
- 78
He's a shill, a liar and a douchebag on top of that. Any man who attends Jim Hagee's church and takes it seriously is screwed in the head.
Obama's Job Killing Machine Moves Forward
- Thread starter Jroc
- Start date
earthling01
Member
- Dec 25, 2010
- 75
- 17
- 6
How many nuclear reactors have been put on line in the USA in the last 15 years?
What percent of grid power comes from renewables in the USA?
If your answers were zero and about 1% respectively, you'd be close.
Valid questions, to be sure. Mostly it's the Liberals who have been against nuclear power. But Obama has said it should be put back to use because it is extremely clean to burn and produces very little CO2.
Do you wonder why the numbers for your Unicorn Power Grid are so low? If you don't, you probably should. Do you want your electric bills to double? Stupid question. Of course you do.
It's not necessarily more expensive to produce the power, but nuclear power plants are inherently more expensive to build. Check out the link:
Nuclear Power Economics | Nuclear Power Costs
Putting aside for the moment the ridiculous idea that experts in the field feel that they cannot make money doing it your way and you think you know more than they do, there are Constitutional issues that the Big 0 is once again grinding into the ground in his headlong rush to destroy the Republic.
Constitutional issues? Like protecting the environment?
You may want U.S. to become another China, but I do not.
Maybe the Congress can de-fund the EPA. I wonder how committed the Unicorns are... Would they work for free? They want people who actually produce things to work for free. One might suppose they would prefer that to getting paid.
After all, if one makes money to do something, then obviously that person is corrupt.
Well, not necessarily "corrupt", but "irresponsible".
It's a sad world when corporations (or in this case, Texas power plants) are blaming the EPA for requiring them to consider the environment when producing power. It's part of being responsible corporations. Yes, profits are important, but it's time to stop trashing the environment in favor of the bottom line.
And why is it fair that Obama take the heat for the BP Oil spill disaster, but also take the heat for demanding stricter environment;a regulations on corporations?
You can't have it both ways, my friend.
What percent of grid power comes from renewables in the USA?
If your answers were zero and about 1% respectively, you'd be close.
Valid questions, to be sure. Mostly it's the Liberals who have been against nuclear power. But Obama has said it should be put back to use because it is extremely clean to burn and produces very little CO2.
Do you wonder why the numbers for your Unicorn Power Grid are so low? If you don't, you probably should. Do you want your electric bills to double? Stupid question. Of course you do.
It's not necessarily more expensive to produce the power, but nuclear power plants are inherently more expensive to build. Check out the link:
Nuclear Power Economics | Nuclear Power Costs
Putting aside for the moment the ridiculous idea that experts in the field feel that they cannot make money doing it your way and you think you know more than they do, there are Constitutional issues that the Big 0 is once again grinding into the ground in his headlong rush to destroy the Republic.
Constitutional issues? Like protecting the environment?
You may want U.S. to become another China, but I do not.
Maybe the Congress can de-fund the EPA. I wonder how committed the Unicorns are... Would they work for free? They want people who actually produce things to work for free. One might suppose they would prefer that to getting paid.
After all, if one makes money to do something, then obviously that person is corrupt.
Well, not necessarily "corrupt", but "irresponsible".
It's a sad world when corporations (or in this case, Texas power plants) are blaming the EPA for requiring them to consider the environment when producing power. It's part of being responsible corporations. Yes, profits are important, but it's time to stop trashing the environment in favor of the bottom line.
And why is it fair that Obama take the heat for the BP Oil spill disaster, but also take the heat for demanding stricter environment;a regulations on corporations?
You can't have it both ways, my friend.
HUGGY
I Post Because I Care
- Thread starter
- #44
Well.. Obama says a lot of things, I don't see him doing anything but hampering this country, we send more manufacturing over a seas, which doesn’t help the environment that’s for sure. Nuclear power yes I'm for it, More oil drilling, yes I’m for it, more natural gas production, yes I'm for it. But Obama and his allies refuse to let us do any of that. You libs can defend him all you want his policies are not and will not help to create any jobs.
- Moderator
- #45
What Texas is fighting is a modification of the act in which the EPA is trying to regulate green house gases in order to "combat" a climate emergency that doesn't exist.
Agit8r
Gold Member
- Dec 4, 2010
- 12,141
- 2,210
- 245
oh, wow...
High Carbon Dioxide Levels May Up Asthma Rate
this is also a reply to the "plant food" nonsense *facepalm*
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Trump has reversed the balance of power in the Middle East
- Started by Hafar1014
- Replies: 8
-
-
Good breakdown of the religious aspects of the Iran war (3.5.26)- Started by Invisibleflash
- Replies: 6
