Obama Judge (not maga) Overseeing Epstein File Release Makes List of Demands

tyroneweaver

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
28,676
Reaction score
15,099
Points
1,405
Location
Burley, Idaho
most of these demands made by this "dem" judge are asinine


Englemayer said he needs more information before he unseals grand jury transcripts:

  • The identity of the party seeking disclosure
  • whether the defendant to the grand jury proceeding of the Government opposes the disclosure
  • why disclosure is being sought in the particular case
  • what specific information is being sought for disclosure
  • how long ago the grand jury proceedings took place
  • the current status of the principals of the grand jury proceedings and that of their families
  • the extent to which the desired material — either permissibly or impermissibly – has been previously made public
  • whether witnesses to the grand jury proceedings who might be affected by disclosure are still alive; and
  • [whether there is an] additional need for maintaining secrecy in the particular case in question
 
Simple fact.

The Supreme Court has even smacked him down over it.

.

The court ruled he could overturn DACA, he simply had to do it right. He couldn't be bothered.

But this has nothing to do with the Epstein files. So you can cease your crusade, right here.
 
Simple fact.

The Supreme Court has even smacked him down over it.

.

The court ruled he could overturn DACA, he simply had to do it right. He couldn't be bothered.

No just like in this case they impose unprecedented demands
 
It does. Trump still hasn't learned that he can't simply wave his arm and get whatever he wants.
Actually, him asking Bondi to request the records through the proper channels is not him waving his arm and getting whatever he wants.

Were you to take off your blinders, you might see that.
 
Actually, him asking Bondi to request the records through the proper channels is not him waving his arm and getting whatever he wants.

Were you to take off your blinders, you might see that.

He only hires the very best......or so he says. It seems he hires those like himself.
 
most of these demands made by this "dem" judge are asinine


Englemayer said he needs more information before he unseals grand jury transcripts:

  • The identity of the party seeking disclosure
  • whether the defendant to the grand jury proceeding of the Government opposes the disclosure
  • why disclosure is being sought in the particular case
  • what specific information is being sought for disclosure
  • how long ago the grand jury proceedings took place
  • the current status of the principals of the grand jury proceedings and that of their families
  • the extent to which the desired material — either permissibly or impermissibly – has been previously made public
  • whether witnesses to the grand jury proceedings who might be affected by disclosure are still alive; and
  • [whether there is an] additional need for maintaining secrecy in the particular case in question
So if it has nothing to help bury Trump, there is nothing to see? Everyone else was innocent.
 
So why didn't the dems release them?

My common sense tells me if there was a there there then they would have used it since they failed miserably otherwise.

Bottom line is that there is nothing to see there.
 
So why didn't the dems release them?

My common sense tells me if there was a there there then they would have used it since they failed miserably otherwise.

Bottom line is that there is nothing to see there.

They should have BUT they also didn't run on the promise to release them.
 
15th post
But this has nothing to do with the Epstein files. So you can cease your crusade, right here.
Well, attempt to "Get Trump!" number 9,593, the Epstein Attempt, has officially gone to rest in the democrap cesspool where the other 9,592 attempts now lie. You would think that at some point they would just give up and instead try to build a better party than the GOP, but no, their best shot at getting ahead will just have to lie in "Get Trump!" attempt number 9,594. Who knows, maybe "Get Trump!" number 14,395 might actually do it, but by then Trump will have been out of office for years and maybe even dead, but that won't stop the democraps. My guess is by the time "Get Trump!" number 14,395 rolls out the entire democrap party will consist of about 50 really stupid neo-leftists and a completely new party will have arisen to take it's place.
 
Englemayer said he needs more information before he unseals grand jury transcripts:

Obama appointee.

He denied the motion and explained why:

This week, the judge rejected the request. It wasn’t just a quick, pro forma objection. Instead, Engelmayer went on for 31 pages as to why the Justice Department fell far short of the high bar it would have to cross to win release.

As far as the public’s right to information is concerned, one part of Engelmayer’s order was particularly notable. The judge read the grand jury testimony involved and made clear that it revealed nothing that is not publicly known about the Epstein case. It’s worth quoting him at some length.

“The court’s review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence,” Engelmayer wrote. “A member of the public familiar with the Maxwell trial record who reviewed the grand jury materials that the government proposes to unseal would thus learn next to nothing new.”

“The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor,” Engelmayer continued. “They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s. They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s crimes. They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein’s death. They do not reveal the path of the government’s investigation.”

Anyone reading the grand jury transcripts “expecting, based on the government’s representations, to learn new information about Epstein’s and Maxwell’s crimes and the investigation into them, would come away feeling disappointed and misled,” Engelmayer concluded. “There is no ‘there’ there.”


 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom