Obama is blackmailing Chief Justice Roberts

[ShootSpeeders]

This is from 2014 but it's more pertinent than ever. Roberts broke the law when he adopted his kids and obozo knows it.

Why John Roberts Likely Is Protecting Obamacare

jan 9 2014
There is very good reason to believe that regardless of the media’s skillful smothering of the story, John Roberts is being blackmailed to make certain Obamacare never falls in a Supreme Court case. The basis of this charge surrounds the fact that a series of strange (and probably felonious) acts are attached to the adoption of his two children.

In 2005, when they thought they were doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited, as are private adoptions

Apparently, when the Democrats realized they could control a Supreme Court Justice’s vote through blackmail over his having committed a number of international crimes, the Times pulled back and dropped its investigation. The Democrat paper of record pulled back because it didn’t want to “ break the seal of an adoption case” – as if violating laws ever means anything to Democrats in their quest for power. Keep in mind Barack Obama’s violation of his opponents’ “sealed” divorce records propelled him to a US Senate seat

 

[bendog]

LOL!

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Just as stupid is this from lushbo -

Rush Thinks He s Found The Real Reason The Supreme Court Let Obamacare Slide -- And It s Sinister

And don't forget - Tipsycatlover aka the drunk doctor, lawyer, dog washer said Obama threatened to harm the justices AND their families.

 

[paddymurphy]

This is from 2014 but it's more pertinent than ever. Roberts broke the law when he adopted his kids and obozo knows it.

Why John Roberts Likely Is Protecting Obamacare

jan 9 2014
There is very good reason to believe that regardless of the media’s skillful smothering of the story, John Roberts is being blackmailed to make certain Obamacare never falls in a Supreme Court case. The basis of this charge surrounds the fact that a series of strange (and probably felonious) acts are attached to the adoption of his two children.

In 2005, when they thought they were doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited, as are private adoptions

Apparently, when the Democrats realized they could control a Supreme Court Justice’s vote through blackmail over his having committed a number of international crimes, the Times pulled back and dropped its investigation. The Democrat paper of record pulled back because it didn’t want to “ break the seal of an adoption case” – as if violating laws ever means anything to Democrats in their quest for power. Keep in mind Barack Obama’s violation of his opponents’ “sealed” divorce records propelled him to a US Senate seat

Do you write for the Onion?

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Do you write for the Onion?

the board notes all you have is namecalling. Address the issue or admit defeat.

 

[Eaglewings]

I have been waiting for comments like these....Rush is pooping his pants...

 

[Little-Acorn]

Could someone please point out the adoption documentation that says or implies that Roberts' adopted children are of Irish ancestry?

The only reference to Irish ancestry I could find in the numerous linked articles, is where some anonymous "leftist blogger" says they "looked Irish". He apparently based it entirely upon his own observations of skin color, as leftists are wont to do.

I see no evidence whatsoever that Roberts is being blackmailed by anyone over anything.

Roberts' bizarre Supreme Court opinions on Obamacare remain unexplained.

 

[boedicca]

In the current environment, the blackmail theory is Highly Plausible.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Just as stupid is this from lushbo -

Rush Thinks He s Found The Real Reason The Supreme Court Let Obamacare Slide -- And It s Sinister

So Rush says roberts took a bribe. All politicians do . Where have you been?

BTW - rush makes 50 mill a year. How much you make.?

 

[Moonglow]

You have to take Rush's word for it, even though he is a convicted criminal....

 

[Skylar]

LOL!

Lets have a hip-hip! for Cognitive Dissonance!

 

[ShootSpeeders]

In the current environment, the blackmail theory is Highly Plausible.

It's either blackmail or bribery. Has to be one of those two. Maybe the DNC gave robby $10 million.

 

[Moonglow]

In the current environment, the blackmail theory is Highly Plausible.

It's either blackmail or bribery. Has to be one of those two. Maybe the DNC gave robby $10 million.

Without proof all you have is looks, and we know what yours looks like...

 

[Skylar]

In the current environment, the blackmail theory is Highly Plausible.

It's either blackmail or bribery. Has to be one of those two. Maybe the DNC gave robby $10 million.

Or....and this is just a thought: option 3) You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about and are making up batshit fantasies as a way of soothing the cognitive dissonance that is created in your psyche when the world doesn't do what you think it should.

 

[hazlnut]

This is from 2014 but it's more pertinent than ever. Roberts broke the law when he adopted his kids and obozo knows it.

Why John Roberts Likely Is Protecting Obamacare

jan 9 2014
There is very good reason to believe that regardless of the media’s skillful smothering of the story, John Roberts is being blackmailed to make certain Obamacare never falls in a Supreme Court case. The basis of this charge surrounds the fact that a series of strange (and probably felonious) acts are attached to the adoption of his two children.

In 2005, when they thought they were doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited, as are private adoptions

Apparently, when the Democrats realized they could control a Supreme Court Justice’s vote through blackmail over his having committed a number of international crimes, the Times pulled back and dropped its investigation. The Democrat paper of record pulled back because it didn’t want to “ break the seal of an adoption case” – as if violating laws ever means anything to Democrats in their quest for power. Keep in mind Barack Obama’s violation of his opponents’ “sealed” divorce records propelled him to a US Senate seat

This is what you sound like...

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Without proof all you have is looks, and we know what yours looks like...

Hey einstein. You can't prove anything but the evidence that robby broke the law here is very strong. THINK

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
Or....and this is just a thought: option 3) You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about and are making up batshit fantasies as a way of soothing the cognitive dissonance that is created in your psyche when the world doesn't do what you think it should.

HAHAHA. More namecalling from the paid govt shills. That's all they ever have.

 

[Skylar]

[
Or....and this is just a thought: option 3) You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about and are making up batshit fantasies as a way of soothing the cognitive dissonance that is created in your psyche when the world doesn't do what you think it should.

HAHAHA. More namecalling from the paid govt shills. That's all they ever have.

Oh, a classic: anyone who doesn't ape the conspiracy becomes part of it. I point out that you can't back any part of your batshit conspiracy theory with evidence and you're just making it up as you along....and now I must be part of the same conspiracy

Sigh. Conspiracy theorists are nothing if not predictable.