No it did not. Your posts are fantasy. Try the blue pill and wake up from the matrix.Of course it happened.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it did not. Your posts are fantasy. Try the blue pill and wake up from the matrix.Of course it happened.
Sounds like you’re hoping for that.Will we be dropping below 45,000 on Monday?
Yes it did. The entire subprime and no-doc loan fiasco was due to Dems wanting unqualified low earners - especially blacks - to have houses just like educated, middle-class people.No it did not. Your posts are fantasy. Try the blue pill and wake up from the matrix.
Whenever Dems can’t defend their catastrophic policies, they just deny them.No it did not. Your posts are fantasy. Try the blue pill and wake up from the matrix.
That isnt remotely true. Banks stopped caring if borrowers could repay because they didn’t plan to keep the loans. The republican repeal of Glass-Seagal opened the way for this by allowing firms to blend activities. This led to small down payments, adjustable mortgages that started low but got high, and other risky loans. Most subprime loans weren’t even to low-income borrowers, they were often to middle-income or speculative buyers. The core issue was incentives and risk being offloaded, not government pushing unqualified borrowers. The subprime boom was driven by private lenders and Wall Street securitization, not affordable housing policy.Yes it did. The entire subprime and no-doc loan fiasco was due to Dems wanting unqualified low earners - especially blacks - to have houses just like educated, middle-class people.
It’s all about “equity.”
That isnt remotely true. Banks stopped caring if borrowers could repay because they didn’t plan to keep the loans. The republican repeal of Glass-Seagal opened the way for this by allowing firms to blend activities. This led to small down payments, adjustable mortgages that started low but got high, and other risky loans. Most subprime loans weren’t even to low-income borrowers, they were often to middle-income or speculative buyers. The core issue was incentives and risk being offloaded, not government pushing unqualified borrowers. The subprime boom was driven by private lenders and Wall Street securitization, not affordable housing policy.
Title doesn’t match the story genius. The story says we needed MORE regulation. That was what Dems pushed and GOP opposed. If you actually tried to learn you would be so fooled.![]()
How the Democrats Created the Financial Crisis
Senior Fellow Kevin A. Hassett The financial crisis of the past year has provided a number of surprising twists and turns, and from Bear Stearns Cos. to American International Group Inc., ambiguity has been a...www.aei.org
No, the story said the Dems voted AGAINST it.Title doesn’t match the story genius. The story says we needed MORE regulation. That was what Dems pushed and GOP opposed. If you actually tried to learn you would be so fooled.
Shit, Fannie and Freddy werent main causes of the crises.. they were late-cycle amplifiers, not the originators of the worst lending.
They did NOT:
That activity was concentrated in non-bank lenders and Wall Street securitization channels.
- Lead the no-doc / NINJA loan explosion
- Dominate the private-label subprime market
- Create the worst underwriting practices
….and allowed by Dems because they wanted poor people to be able to buy houses.Title doesn’t match the story genius. The story says we needed MORE regulation. That was what Dems pushed and GOP opposed. If you actually tried to learn you would be so fooled.
Shit, Fannie and Freddy werent main causes of the crises.. they were late-cycle amplifiers, not the originators of the worst lending.
They did NOT:
That activity was concentrated in non-bank lenders and Wall Street securitization channels.
- Lead the no-doc / NINJA loan explosion
- Dominate the private-label subprime market
- Create the worst underwriting practices
Democrats opposed only parts of the 2005 bill over concerns about restricting mortgage access and the structure of regulation, not because they opposed oversigh. That bill by itself wouldn’t have addressed the main drivers of the crisis anyway. The bill didn’t address the actual epicenter of the crisis which was private lenders and securitization incentives.No, the story said the Dems voted AGAINST it.
But the Dems still opposed the bill “restricting access” and the crisis skyrocketed.Democrats opposed only parts of the 2005 bill over concerns about restricting mortgage access and the structure of regulation, not because they opposed oversigh. That bill by itself wouldn’t have addressed the main drivers of the crisis anyway. The bill didn’t address the actual epicenter of the crisis which was private lenders and securitization incentives.
Your surface level googling has failed you on this topic. You look very silly.
Again, nothing you typed is true and Fannie/freddie didnt drive the subprime crisis. Why cant you engage your brain without trying to make everything into racism?But the Dems still opposed the bill “restricting access” and the crisis skyrocketed.
This is what happens when you try to “equitize” people
Nothing racist about what I said: it is absolutely true that Dems are trying to “equitize” individual blacks who are unqualified for something - be it a job or a mortgage - for years.Again, nothing you typed is true and Fannie/freddie didnt drive the subprime crisis. Why cant you engage your brain without trying to make everything into racism?
Good link. That's exactly how I remember it going down. And you know who was the biggest recipient of campaign funds from Democrat-controlled Fannie and Freddie in his brief career as a senator? Barack 0bama. So he was hip-deep in the entire crisis.![]()
How the Democrats Created the Financial Crisis
Senior Fellow Kevin A. Hassett The financial crisis of the past year has provided a number of surprising twists and turns, and from Bear Stearns Cos. to American International Group Inc., ambiguity has been a...www.aei.org
Well this post didn't age well....and it didn't take that much time for it to completely blow up.And yet another milestone by President Donald Trump. DJIA closed over 50,000 for the first time in history. Is there any limit to the greatness this man can achieve? The DOW has risen a whopping 17% since Election Day, 2024 while inflation has dropped, and prices have dropped. The left said it couldn't be done, but here we are.
So much for recession talk.
So much for the claim that tariffs have failed.
So much for the claim Trump didn't know what he was doing.
This is a day for massive celebration. (The past year has been full of them, it seems).

The market always comes back. It always does. I am more pointing out that your effusive praise of the Orange Roughy's stock market climbing above 50K (briefly), is unwarranted. He didn't do that.Here is the fact of the matter. Unless you are pulling your investments, you believe the Trump market will rebound.
But this based on the big assumption you are invested in the market at all. Most leftwingers aren't. Guys like CG and Winco have like 50 grand in it, and they are in level-4 panic. I believe both have implied they're getting out. Are you?
Of course he did it. And you just admitted you believe it will come back. So I guess the thread didn't blow up. Whoops.The market always comes back. It always does. I am more pointing out that your effusive praise of the Orange Roughy's stock market climbing above 50K (briefly), is unwarranted. He didn't do that.![]()
LOL. If you are that submissive that you give him credit for it going above 50K, you also have to give him credit for knocking it back down to 45K with his mouth and incompetent actions.Of course he did it. And you just admitted you believe it will come back. So I guess the thread didn't blow up. Whoops.

So you're in the camp that believes Iran's terrorist network and efforts to acquire nuclear weapons should have been left alone? Got it.LOL. If you are that submissive that you give him credit for it going above 50K, you also have to give him credit for knocking it back down to 45K with his mouth and incompetent actions.
Your post was fawning. Embarrassing. And yes, it blew up..badly.
Oh, and inflation hasn't dropped (it's rising again)..and prices???..what crack fever dream do you live in?![]()