Now there is a push from the left to eliminate the police body cameras they demanded.

[ColonelAngus]

The left now claims that since police brutality is the same since introduction of body cameras, they must be eliminated because they do not work.

What is the real reason?

The left do not like the exposure of what police actually deal with when encountering law breaking citizens.

Some of the most popular YOUTUBE channels involve Police Body Cameras and wild interactions of the public with police.

I say that police body cameras are great and should continue to be used.

First the video shows Kamala, Obama, and Hillary demanding body cameras.

Then, at 8:45, it shows people now claiming it is Evil tech wanting a “surveillance state”.

My favorite is 9:45. She claims body cameras always make the wearer the hero because you cannot see them from the perspective of the suspect. Thereby not telling the entire story.

The real reason is that the video evidence often works against the suspect, and with the video footage, if the suspect lies about what they did, it is easily displayed.

The left, as they often do, FLIP FLOP.

 

[1srelluc]

Meh, they should have been more careful for what they wished for.

 

[pknopp]

" I saw some random video on the internet and boy it sure triggered me."

 

[JoeB131]

The left now claims that since police brutality is the same since introduction of body cameras, they must be eliminated because they do not work.

What is the real reason?

The left do not like the exposure of what police actually deal with when encountering law breaking citizens.

Some of the most popular YOUTUBE channels involve Police Body Cameras and wild interactions of the public with police.

I say that police body cameras are great and should continue to be used.

First the video shows Kamala, Obama, and Hillary demanding body cameras.

Then, at 8:45, it shows people now claiming it is Evil tech wanting a “surveillance state”.

My favorite is 9:45. She claims body cameras always make the wearer the hero because you cannot see them from the perspective of the suspect. Thereby not telling the entire story.

The real reason is that the video evidence often works against the suspect, and with the video footage, if the suspect lies about what they did, it is easily displayed.

The left, as they often do, FLIP FLOP.

I don't know of anyone who wants to get rid of body cameras.

Body cameras work well because now that cops know they are recording their work, they are being more professional.

Now, yes, some people have concerns that a network of ring cameras has pretty much eliminated any notion of privacy. With every square inch of the country being covered by a camera, there's not much anyone can get away with.

 

[ColonelAngus]

" I saw some random video on the internet and boy it sure triggered me."

I will Venmo you a ruble if you put me on ignore.

I guess this means you like body cameras?

Why the quotes on a non quote?

What defines a RANDOM video?

Do you want me to call 911 for you? Apparently someone has a gun to your head and made you not only click on, but respond to the post.

Thanks for the contribution to the thread…you lovely anarchist.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The left now claims that since police brutality is the same since introduction of body cameras, they must be eliminated because they do not work.

What is the real reason?

The left do not like the exposure of what police actually deal with when encountering law breaking citizens.

Some of the most popular YOUTUBE channels involve Police Body Cameras and wild interactions of the public with police.

I say that police body cameras are great and should continue to be used.

First the video shows Kamala, Obama, and Hillary demanding body cameras.

Then, at 8:45, it shows people now claiming it is Evil tech wanting a “surveillance state”.

My favorite is 9:45. She claims body cameras always make the wearer the hero because you cannot see them from the perspective of the suspect. Thereby not telling the entire story.

The real reason is that the video evidence often works against the suspect, and with the video footage, if the suspect lies about what they did, it is easily displayed.

The left, as they often do, FLIP FLOP.

/----/ Even when libtards get what they demand, they still aren't happy.

 

[Blaster]

Democrats are never happy.

 

[pknopp]

I will Venmo you a ruble if you put me on ignore.

I guess this means you like body cameras?

Why the quotes on a non quote?

What defines a RANDOM video?

Do you want me to call 911 for you? Apparently someone has a gun to your head and made you not only click on, but respond to the post.

Thanks for the contribution to the thread…you lovely anarchist.

View attachment 1228040

Still triggered I see.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I don't know of anyone who wants to get rid of body cameras.

Body cameras work well because now that cops know they are recording their work, they are being more professional.

Now, yes, some people have concerns that a network of ring cameras has pretty much eliminated any notion of privacy. With every square inch of the country being covered by a camera, there's not much anyone can get away with.

For real, someone call Joe an ambulance, i think he fell and hit his head. WE MOSTLY AGREE.

As far as not knowing anyone who wants to eliminate body cams, I posted video of people from the left claiming they should be removed.

 

[Correll]

The left now claims that since police brutality is the same since introduction of body cameras, they must be eliminated because they do not work.

What is the real reason?

The left do not like the exposure of what police actually deal with when encountering law breaking citizens.

Some of the most popular YOUTUBE channels involve Police Body Cameras and wild interactions of the public with police.

I say that police body cameras are great and should continue to be used.

First the video shows Kamala, Obama, and Hillary demanding body cameras.

Then, at 8:45, it shows people now claiming it is Evil tech wanting a “surveillance state”.

My favorite is 9:45. She claims body cameras always make the wearer the hero because you cannot see them from the perspective of the suspect. Thereby not telling the entire story.

The real reason is that the video evidence often works against the suspect, and with the video footage, if the suspect lies about what they did, it is easily displayed.

The left, as they often do, FLIP FLOP.

Yes, but more than that.

The videos show that teh bad guys are often barely human, more feral animals, who any sane person would want locked up, away from decent human beings.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Yes, but more than that.

The videos show that teh bad guys are often barely human, more feral animals, who any sane person would want locked up, away from decent human beings.

The ones who essentially committing suicide by cop are somewhat disturbing. I have seen multiple times when a suspect charges at a cop with a knife or axe.

 

[Correll]

" I saw some random video on the internet and boy it sure triggered me."

I know you have seen some of the same videos, where you have supposed HUMANS, acting as though they have not had ONE moment of training to behave like a civilized person.

Being... disgusted or outraged that such people exist and our roaming our streets where they could interact someday, with our loved ones,

is the sane and healthy reaction.


Do you not agree?

 

[Polishprince]

The key IMHO, is to make sure the body cameras are wired for sound.

A now-retired police officer I know, got in trouble and almost fired, because of a nogudnik he gave an attitude correction to with his baton.

BTW, the miscreant was a fellow honky.


After the verbal altercation was disclosed, it turned out the officer had every right to beat the suspect to the fullest extent of the law, as he had falsely accused the cop's wife of prostitution.

 

[pknopp]

I know you have seen some of the same videos,

I don't watch these kinds of video's.

 

[pknopp]

The key IMHO, is to make sure the body cameras are wired for sound.

A now-retired police officer I know, got in trouble and almost fired, because of a nogudnik he gave an attitude correction to with his baton.

BTW, the miscreant was a fellow honky.


After the verbal altercation was disclosed, it turned out the officer had every right to beat the suspect to the fullest extent of the law, as he had falsely accused the cop's wife of prostitution.

You can't beat someone over their speech.

 

[Correll]

The ones who essentially committing suicide by cop are somewhat disturbing. I have seen multiple times when a suspect charges at a cop with a knife or axe.

It seems that they have no ability to control their emotional impulses. Their brains, don't factor in the facts of the situation and decide that it is bad to attack.

They feel anger and rage, so they attack. That they are about to get themselves killed, is beyond their abilty to consider.

That would require rational thought.

 

[Correll]

I don't watch these kinds of video's.

So, you are dismissing them, despite being completely uninformed on the issue? And trying to smear people with them, despite your complete lack of information?

Ok. I believe that. It is completely in character with modern libs.

 

[pknopp]

So, you are dismissing them, despite being completely uninformed on the issue? And trying to smear people with them, despite your complete lack of information?

Ok. I believe that. It is completely in character with modern libs.

I'm fully informed. As already noted above, no one is trying to stop body camera's.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I don't watch these kinds of video's.

Why did you make videos possessive?

What do the videos possess?

You need a different hobby. You are simply a contrarian.

 

[Oddball]