GLASNOST
Platinum Member
That is only reason he was given the award but the old, white-guilt, geezers will never admit it.Obama did nothing to deserve that award besides being colored.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is only reason he was given the award but the old, white-guilt, geezers will never admit it.Obama did nothing to deserve that award besides being colored.
The CIA takes its orders from the Deep State and/or the MIC. Can we say it was Eisenhower just because he was the president at the time? No, I don't think so. Who gave the order to assassinate John Kennedy and Olof Palme? Who decided to put into motion the illegal Operation TP Ajax and the illegal invasion of Irak?When you pin them down let me know.
What THEORY are you talking about. Be specific.So you believe in conspiracy theories. I believe some as well.
Islam is a brutal , violent authoritarian culture. Sorry if you're triggered by thatI am telling YOU and I am guessing that you didn't follow up my statements. Iran had a full-functioning DEMOCRACY, not "a violent brutal authoritarian culture" as you seem to believe. The CIA destroyed it. On purpose - Intentionally - By design - An orchestrated political coup. Do you know what those mean? I have provided you with all of the information needed to find out if I am lying to you or telling you the truth. But it is you who refuse to look the facts in the eye. I don't care what you do or what you believe. Suit yourself. But however you look at it, the US is responsible for what Iran is today. The US destroyed Iran's DEMOCRACY yet calls itself DEMOCRATIC. What a hoot. So, should Iran see DEMOCRACY as weak, unable to protect itself from US treachery or should Iran believe that US really is a DEMOCRACY thus a treacherous entity itself? Either way ......... Iran is doing what it must do to survive ...... from their point of view DEMOCRACY does not look like the way to maintain its survival.![]()
..... I am guessing that you didn't follow up my statements. Iran had a full-functioning DEMOCRACY, not "a violent brutal authoritarian culture" as you seem to believe. The CIA destroyed it. On purpose - Intentionally - By design - An orchestrated political coup. Do you know what those mean? I have provided you with all of the information needed to find out if I am lying to you or telling you the truth. But it is you who refuse to look the facts in the eye. I don't care what you do or what you believe. Suit yourself. But however you look at it, the US is responsible for what Iran is today. The US destroyed Iran's DEMOCRACY yet calls itself DEMOCRATIC. What a hoot. So, should Iran see DEMOCRACY as weak, unable to protect itself from US treachery or should Iran believe that US really is a DEMOCRACY thus a treacherous entity itself? Either way ......... Iran is doing what it must do to survive ...... from their point of view DEMOCRACY does not look like the way to maintain its survival.![]()
You are an idiot … and an adolescent apparently.Islam is a brutal , violent authoritarian culture. Sorry if you're triggered by that
The people of Iran are what matters and they want their corrupt government gone. I'm certain few to none of them will vote for a religious dictatorship.I am telling YOU and I am guessing that you didn't follow up my statements. Iran had a full-functioning DEMOCRACY, not "a violent brutal authoritarian culture" as you seem to believe. The CIA destroyed it. On purpose - Intentionally - By design - An orchestrated political coup. Do you know what those mean? I have provided you with all of the information needed to find out if I am lying to you or telling you the truth. But it is you who refuse to look the facts in the eye. I don't care what you do or what you believe. Suit yourself. But however you look at it, the US is responsible for what Iran is today. The US destroyed Iran's DEMOCRACY yet calls itself DEMOCRATIC. What a hoot. So, should Iran see DEMOCRACY as weak, unable to protect itself from US treachery or should Iran believe that US really is a DEMOCRACY thus a treacherous entity itself? Either way ......... Iran is doing what it must do to survive ...... from their point of view DEMOCRACY does not look like the way to maintain its survival.![]()
There must be something wrong with you to be triggered so by this conversation. Calm down you're going to blow a vein. You know I didn't see any references or any backup at all in your screed above. Was it all just conjecture on your part?You are an idiot … and an adolescent apparently.
What a hoot. You think it's me who's got his panties up his crack and incompetence on the edge of the building. Go find a mirror.There must be something wrong with you to be triggered so by this conversation. Calm down you're going to blow a vein. You know I didn't see any references or any backup at all in your screed above. Was it all just conjecture on your part?
I really don't know what you're talking about. Ramble on dudeWhat a hoot. You think it's me who's got his panties up his crack and incompetence on the edge of the building. Go find a mirror.
So, as others have noted, why don't you enlighten us all about what Obama did BEFORE getting the award that was deserving of it being granted?In your opinion , thankfully not those of level-minded individuals across the world.
.Trump is foolish to want a Nobel Prize.
They gave a Nobel Prize to a racist bigot cretin who hung out with Louis Farrakhan and the Black Panthers, Barry Obama.
And they also gave it to the neo Nazi Muslim terrorist paedophile Yasser Arafat.
View attachment 1194104
View attachment 1194103
And then didn’t."Hung out with"??? How often? Trump hung out with Epstein, we know this, because Trump told us.
We keep telling you ..... he was already black. He didn't apply black face just because he knew he'd get the award. He was born that way. Getting the award was a cinch. All he needed to do was get to be president....... enlighten us all about what Obama did BEFORE getting the award that was deserving of it being granted?
First and foremost he was a decent human being that cared about other people. He was well educated and had principles he lived by. He was true to his word. He had a good moral compass. All of these are good starting points. The key findings of the committee were he promoted nonproliferation of nuclear weapons and fostered a " new climate " in reaching out to the muslim world. That was good enough for them. , it's good enough for me. Those are the facts. I don't care if you want to argue about it but I'm almost certain you will. Go luck with that , you can't change history. P. S. The Doomsday Clock confirmed these thoughts , it ticked backwards during the Obama administration. With trump it's ticking forward again. Not a good signal for the well-being of the humans of earth and the planet itself.So, as others have noted, why don't you enlighten us all about what Obama did BEFORE getting the award that was deserving of it being granted?
Obama was a ruthless monster that maintained a kill list and bombed countries with no remorse of concern about innocentsFirst and foremost he was a decent human being that cared about other people. He was well educated and had principles he lived by. He was true to his word. He had a good moral compass. All of these are good starting points. The key findings of the committee were he promoted nonproliferation of nuclear weapons and fostered a " new climate " in reaching out to the muslim world. That was good enough for them. , it's good enough for me. Those are the facts. I don't care if you want to argue about it but I'm almost certain you will. Go luck with that , you can't change history. P. S. The Doomsday Clock confirmed these thoughts , it ticked backwards during the Obama administration. With trump it's ticking forward again. Not a good signal for the well-being of the humans of earth and the planet itself.
So are billions of people around the world. That's hardly Nobel Prize worthy.First and foremost he was a decent human being that cared about other people.
So do billions of people around the world. That's hardly Nobel Prize worthy.He was well educated and had principles he lived by.
So are billions of people around the world. That's hardly Nobel Prize worthy.He was true to his word.
So do billions of people around the world. That's hardly Nobel Prize worthy.He had a good moral compass.
As I've noted, billions of people have those starting points. The Prize is supposed to be about significant impacts on world peace, not good attitudes.All of these are good starting points.
Sure can't, and history shows he had no major accomplishments at all when they gave him the prize, just good feelings.The key findings of the committee were he promoted nonproliferation of nuclear weapons and fostered a " new climate " in reaching out to the muslim world. That was good enough for them. , it's good enough for me. Those are the facts. I don't care if you want to argue about it but I'm almost certain you will. Go luck with that , you can't change history.
You failed the assignment, which was to post things he did to DESERVE the prize BEFORE he got it. Face reality, they gave it to him even though he had no real accomplishments at all.P. S. The Doomsday Clock confirmed these thoughts , it ticked backwards during the Obama administration. With trump it's ticking forward again. Not a good signal for the well-being of the humans of earth and the planet itself.
In your opinion , thankfully not the opinion of the committee professionals.So are billions of people around the world. That's hardly Nobel Prize worthy.
So do billions of people around the world. That's hardly Nobel Prize worthy.
So are billions of people around the world. That's hardly Nobel Prize worthy.
So do billions of people around the world. That's hardly Nobel Prize worthy.
As I've noted, billions of people have those starting points. The Prize is supposed to be about significant impacts on world peace, not good attitudes.
Sure can't, and history shows he had no major accomplishments at all when they gave him the prize, just good feelings.
You failed the assignment, which was to post things he did to DESERVE the prize BEFORE he got it. Face reality, they gave it to him even though he had no real accomplishments at all.
What’s not an opinion is the fact Obama was a two face monster, that claimed to be opposed to the death penalty, while maintaining a kill list of MuslimsIn your opinion , thankfully not the opinion of the committee professionals.
And again, you have failed to present any major accomplishments with world-wide impacts on peace that Obama did to deserve the award. Until you do that, it is all about opinion, which makes my point for me. The committee members FELT like he deserved it, but there were no major accomplishments to point to.In your opinion , thankfully not the opinion of the committee professionals.
At least he didn’t threaten to take Greenland “one way or another”. I think that statement alone pretty much disqualifies you from winning the peace prize.And again, you have failed to present any major accomplishments with world-wide impacts on peace that Obama did to deserve the award. Until you do that, it is all about opinion, which makes my point for me. The committee members FELT like he deserved it, but there were no major accomplishments to point to.
No obama just keep a kill list, and bombed countries indiscriminately, with no regard to innocent livesAt least he didn’t threaten to take Greenland “one way or another”. I think that statement alone pretty much disqualifies you from winning the peace prize.