NO REDACTIONS.... nobody's "national security" is at risk

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
30,429
Reaction score
17,961
Points
2,788


"all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials"


"the attorney general may withhold or redact any information that identifies victims or would jeopardize an active federal investigation."


TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE




This is all BS. Either forced totally unredacted release of all classified and unclassified or don't to it. Col Tim is clearly in the "classified" section... as are all the other traitors who will dodge guilt by being "chosen to be classified."
 


"all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials"


"the attorney general may withhold or redact any information that identifies victims or would jeopardize an active federal investigation."


TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE




This is all BS. Either forced totally unredacted release of all classified and unclassified or don't to it. Col Tim is clearly in the "classified" section... as are all the other traitors who will dodge guilt by being "chosen to be classified."


Why should victims names be made public, against their wishes? Who does that help?
 
G6EURPib0AAkp9w


 
You either want it OUT or you DON'T.

if you give "wiggle room" they'll all hide...

For the female victims, just publish the first name then... but don't let them "redact" anything.
I imagine not everybody mentioned are perps, a certain number could be innocent.
Or, you just want them to be the collateral damage?

Figures....POS
 


"all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials"


"the attorney general may withhold or redact any information that identifies victims or would jeopardize an active federal investigation."


TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE




This is all BS. Either forced totally unredacted release of all classified and unclassified or don't to it. Col Tim is clearly in the "classified" section... as are all the other traitors who will dodge guilt by being "chosen to be classified."

The same ones that have been keeping the evidence classified, are the same ones who are going to redact any important names from the files.
 
Why should victims names be made public, against their wishes? Who does that help?
The victims have publicly supported the release, rather than hide the crimes of the rich and powerful, is a pretty good reason.
 


"all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials"


"the attorney general may withhold or redact any information that identifies victims or would jeopardize an active federal investigation."


TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE




This is all BS. Either forced totally unredacted release of all classified and unclassified or don't to it. Col Tim is clearly in the "classified" section... as are all the other traitors who will dodge guilt by being "chosen to be classified."

Boring.
 
Nope, you cannot do that to someone.

If they can prosecute the guilty people without exposing the innocent, I'm all for it. But if they have to expose victims to get to those who raped them... Too bad.
Obviously doing that wouldn't be near as bad as getting raped.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom