Moonglow
Diamond Member
Since voting laws were created.
Ninth Circuit Delivers Decision on Citizenship and Voter Registration in Arizona
- Thread starter Lastamender
- Start date
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,096
- 78,314
- 2,645
As it should be you have to prove citizenship to register to vote. Maybe we are approaching common sense. Non-citizens don’t get to vote in anything.
Kiss of Death for the democrat Party
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
- Thread starter
- #23
This is about showing proof of citizenship to register. Try reading. AZ. did not require that, now they have to or that vote is illegal. It is just harder to cheat. Is that bad?Uh...this was already the law. Non-citizens can't vote in a national or state election...anywhere.
Congrats, fixing a problem...that doesn't exist.
Not following. These requirements are pretty much in the website I linked, even if it was old.
How do any of these requirements allow a non-citizen to get a ballot and then file it legally?
There was no cheating. These were always requirements. This is just kabuki theater for those of you who believe in conspiracy theories.
Fixing problem...that don't exist.
If you read through the registration process, it shows you can get a ballot for federal elections only with no id, no proof of residency. The new site that I gave you was created and namer by our governor, who was sec of state in az and in charge of elections while she ran for governor
She created a lot of newbaz state websites, but left the old ones up. No idea why
But what I tell you is true. Illegals voted here in az. And they did so legally. Our state Assembly forced the governor to create the bullshit 'federal only ballot' that required no id by withholding funding for EVERYTHING. I know this because I live here, I don't rely on 'friends and family in az' . I live here and have for over 30 years.
Edited to add, now that is changed. You now have to have id and show proof of residency to vote in az.
The federal only ballot in AZ was created in response to Garland's lawsuit because the state Assembly passed a law requiring id and proof of residency to vote. So the assembly said, ok but we will only do that for fed elections and still require id for state elections.
This court case overturns garlands lawsuit. It fixed a damn big problem that DID exist
This court case overturns garlands lawsuit. It fixed a damn big problem that DID exist
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
- Thread starter
- #28
There was all kinds of cheating and no doubt will be again. This time they will get caught.There was no cheating. These were always requirements. This is just kabuki theater for those of you who believe in conspiracy theories.
Fixing problem...that don't exist.
I have a friend who has a family from El Salvador working for him that lives about 11 miles away, a neighbor. I talk with him via text every day.
He is losing his employees he just texted me . They told him if they can't vote here they are leaving. They plan to go to New York. They have friends or someone there that invited them and they claim they can vote there.
He is losing his employees he just texted me . They told him if they can't vote here they are leaving. They plan to go to New York. They have friends or someone there that invited them and they claim they can vote there.
1srelluc
Diamond Member
Damn, and from the 9th circus no less.
Missouri_Mike
Diamond Member
- Nov 5, 2012
- 26,635
- 18,974
- 2,405
It wasn’t a problem yet the pro illegal groups fought it. Fuck off.
Missouri_Mike
Diamond Member
- Nov 5, 2012
- 26,635
- 18,974
- 2,405
Next is voter ID in federal law. And enforcing both. Cry in your unicorn pillow.
excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 24,721
- 49,165
- 2,290
I don't know, I'm in az. That's what they claim, and they claim they will get money and live with their friends
excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 24,721
- 49,165
- 2,290
NYC law that would have allowed 800K noncitizens to vote struck as unconstitutional by appeals court: ‘Enacted in violation’
A controversial New York City law that would allow 800,000 non-citizens to vote in municipal elections was struck down as unconstitutional by a state appeals court Wednesday.
nypost.com
- Moderator
- #37
Moonglow
Diamond Member
It will need to be a Constitutional amendment.
No. It has to part of state law. It's kinda why Garland's case got tossed in the 9th
Moonglow
Diamond Member
Better read the Constitution then, derpa...
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The Supreme Court has determined that, under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, states may require a duration of residency as a qualification to vote, but such requirements will be held unconstitutional unless the state can show that the requirement is necessary to serve a compelling interest.1 According to the Court in Dunn v. Blumstein, [t]his exacting test applies because the right to vote is a fundamental political right . . . preservative of all rights, and because a durational residence requirement directly impinges on the exercise of a second fundamental personal right, the right to travel.2 While acknowledging that states have a legitimate and compelling interest in preventing fraud by voters, in Dunn, the Court determined that a one-year residency requirement in a state and a three-month residency requirement in a county was not necessary to further a compelling governmental interest.3 In contrast, the Court in Marston v. Lewis upheld a fifty-day durational residency and voter registration requirement, determining that the law was necessary to serve the State’s important interest in accurate voter lists.4
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Jasmine Crockett SNAPS After President Trump Dunks On Her During Meet The Press Interview- Started by RhodyPatriot
- Replies: 2
-
Netanyahu declared firm support for Trump’s stance on Iran, which he declared in a post from March, hours after a deadly Houthi attac- Started by Mack The Finger
- Replies: 0
-
Report: All Horses in 151st Kentucky Derby Were Descended from Legendary Secretariat
- Started by Mack The Finger
- Replies: 0
-
Philly night club displays vile Jewish hate . Video- Started by Quasar44
- Replies: 3
-
