Attempts to confiscate the guns of law-abiding Americans appear to be stalled. If the past is prologue, Democrats will regroup and try again. The thing I’ve noticed is that Hussein & Company’s failure gave birth to more resistence than I’ve ever seen before now. Not only did Hussein’s actions sell more guns to average Americans than ever before, organized resistence in defense of the Second Amendment is forming. Oath Keepers 151 has to be the organization that sends chills up Hussein’s spine:
It’s fair to say that Hussein anticipated strong resistence as far back as July, 2008 when he called for his infamous civilian paramilitary force:
Hussein must have known he could not rely upon the police or the US military to violate their oaths of office; hence, his ARMED civilian force was designed to fight against anyone refusing to confiscate guns.
Hussein was not alone. His paramilitary goon squad found funding in Hillarycare II. To this day the public does not know the names of the people who put funding for a paramilitary organization into the healthcare bill. Whoever did it had to be following somebody’s orders. Was it Hussein? Was it Harry Reid. Was it Pelosi? who taunted beforehand:
Bottom line: Hussein forgot Newton’s third law of motion when he thought he was being so clever, but he sure as hell triggered it:
On the plus side: Every time Democrats attack the Second Amendment and are beaten back they are moved closer to facing their final option —— repeal the Second Amendment. That is one option they will never exercise because failing at repeal must finally bring an end to all backdoor attempts to disarm law-abiding Americans.
The Left’s war against the Second Amendment is relatively new —— and unwinnable. Not so with the ACLU’s war against this country’s very foundation:
As an average American, I never understood why the ACLU was funded in part by tax dollars. Whenever the ACLU brings one of it lawsuits they bill the taxpayer whether they win or lose. Paying the ACLU tax dollars is the most egregious example of forcing Americans to fund a political cause they do not believe in. It is worse than forcing Americans to fund a traditional religion not of their choosing in that a traditional church could lose its tax exempt status for preaching politics from the pulpit, while the ACLU receives tax dollars for promoting its religion in courtrooms. I guess the First Amendment dos not apply to the ACLU.
The sad truth is that ACLU has been winning the war one small battle at a time; nevertheless, the ACLU does not win every time. In addition to Jerome Corsi’s latest book —— Bad Samaritans: The ACLU’s Relentless Campaign to Erase Faith from the Public Square —— the ACLU is being fought as never before.
Happily, the ACLU lost a big one in 2007 when two federal appellate courts hit the ACLU where it hurts the most. In denying lawsuits because plaintiffs lack “standing” the amount of tax dollars going to ACLU lawyers in fees is reduced considerably. This is from an article by Jordan Lorence:
Before standing was denied a pack of ACLU lawyers would enhance their incomes by showing up in court and then billing taxpayers for their time. I recall reading that dozens of ACLU lawyers simply show up in local courts and bill the town for their “participation” in the suit. Few towns and counties can afford to pay those astronomical fees; so the ACLU would force settlements by default. Regardless of standing taxpayers should not be forced to pay the ACLU’s fees for bringing political lawsuits:
The court finally reining in the ACLU’s legislative lawsuits is not the end of the ACLU’s destructive interference in other realms of the law.
Before moving on to more precise matters, I want to address this often misunderstood line:
Taken in context Shakespeare was praising lawyers.
I doubt if there are ten adults in America who never heard the line “Kill all the lawyers.” But how many know the reason Dick was suggesting mass murder?
Dick was saying that killing all lawyers was a necessary condition for successful revolution; i.e., putting Jack Cade the clothier on the English throne.
I am not defending lawyers, nor could I. The ACLU is the problem with a blanket endorsement. No one but a liberal can defend ACLU lawyers who foment revolution rather than prevent it. In short: ACLU lawyers are not the kind of lawyers Dick wanted to kill.
The money
Denying standing signaled a major sea change in the ACLU’s access to tax dollars. The problem is: The appellate courts did not go far enough.
Some will argue that the ACLU is entitled to tax dollars because it fights for everybody’s Rights. Not true. The ACLU defends causes and defendants that diminish the Rights of law-abiding Americans. Try to imagine those who think the ACLU is a good thing being forced to support a Christian religion. They would go out of their minds.
And if the ACLU is so wonderful Americans would see it and support it voluntarily. By forcing me to support the ACLU with tax dollars my Rights disappear completely. That is definitely not in line with the Constitution the ACLU always claims it defends.
Parenthetically, it’s no wonder liberals insist the US Constitution is a living, breathing, document. The Socialist priesthood not only believes in their religion’s Right to government funding they can point to tax dollars as proof.
Myths
An article by J. Matt Barber exposes the ACLU’s numerous myths about itself. Barber explains what the Founders meant by the separation of church and state:
Intent at the time seems pretty clear to me. And who would argue that the Founders meant it was okay for Congress to establish non-Christian religions out of the public purse. That’s exactly what Socialists did. In any event, the ACLU defending the first 10 words in the First Amendment is akin to an atheist defending God in a kangaroo court:
The ACLU is an arm of the Socialist religion just as the Society of Jesus is an order in the Roman Catholic Church. At the very least the ACLU is a sect within the broader Socialist/Communist religion just as Christianity, Islam, and other religions have sects.
I especially enjoyed this in Barber’s piece:
I love the phrase “ironic doublespeak.” I hyphenate ironic-doublespeak in order to distinguish it from old-fashioned, no nonsense, doublespeak —— the mainstay of Socialists/Communists posing as leading Democrats.
NOTE: The ACLU is one more result of the foulest president in America’s history 1913 through 1920. I’m not posting his name in the hope a few youngsters will never forget it if they have to look it up.
The ACLU has been at it long enough to have one of their own on the US Supreme Court in the person of Ruth Ginsburg. Other justices fudge a bit on issues near and dear to their hearts. Liberal justices favor broad themes like socialism, non-existent International law, and so on, while Ginsburg is the only one who represents a specific organization advocating a precise religious ideology hidden behind this myth:
Here’s the myth-buster:
Roger Baldwin (1884 - 1981) the ACLU’s first director, laid out the ideology for all time irrespective of the ACLU barring Communists from leadership and staff positions in 1940. There was a reason for his ploy.
By the time WWII ended American Communists knew better than to join the Communist party since membership was the only way they could be defined as a Communist short of a confession. The strategy: Work for communism in every way possible, but don’t join the party.
In order to advance the Communist agenda without being weighed down by party membership the techniques of doublespeak, newspeak, outright lies, and destroying everyone who was wise to them became SOP. American Socialists/Communists along with their pals in the media were so successful in destroying Senator Joseph McCarthy (1908 - 1957) few dared challenge them.
Finally, a counterattack has been mounted on the Internet. Will it succeed in cancelling out the Left’s weapons of personal destruction? My guess is that the Net is already having a positive effect, but there is still a long way to go.
The beauty in Net Warfare is that Socialists do not control it. There are plenty of Libs spewing their garbage on the Net to be sure, but they are not the only game in town as they are in education, entertainment, and the old media.
It’s fair to say that Hussein anticipated strong resistence as far back as July, 2008 when he called for his infamous civilian paramilitary force:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=UHmecy94z-M]Obama calls for civilian paramilitary force - YouTube[/ame]
Hussein must have known he could not rely upon the police or the US military to violate their oaths of office; hence, his ARMED civilian force was designed to fight against anyone refusing to confiscate guns.
Hussein was not alone. His paramilitary goon squad found funding in Hillarycare II. To this day the public does not know the names of the people who put funding for a paramilitary organization into the healthcare bill. Whoever did it had to be following somebody’s orders. Was it Hussein? Was it Harry Reid. Was it Pelosi? who taunted beforehand:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=hV-05TLiiLU]Pelosi: "We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It" - YouTube[/ame]
Bottom line: Hussein forgot Newton’s third law of motion when he thought he was being so clever, but he sure as hell triggered it:
On the plus side: Every time Democrats attack the Second Amendment and are beaten back they are moved closer to facing their final option —— repeal the Second Amendment. That is one option they will never exercise because failing at repeal must finally bring an end to all backdoor attempts to disarm law-abiding Americans.
The Left’s war against the Second Amendment is relatively new —— and unwinnable. Not so with the ACLU’s war against this country’s very foundation:
As an average American, I never understood why the ACLU was funded in part by tax dollars. Whenever the ACLU brings one of it lawsuits they bill the taxpayer whether they win or lose. Paying the ACLU tax dollars is the most egregious example of forcing Americans to fund a political cause they do not believe in. It is worse than forcing Americans to fund a traditional religion not of their choosing in that a traditional church could lose its tax exempt status for preaching politics from the pulpit, while the ACLU receives tax dollars for promoting its religion in courtrooms. I guess the First Amendment dos not apply to the ACLU.
The sad truth is that ACLU has been winning the war one small battle at a time; nevertheless, the ACLU does not win every time. In addition to Jerome Corsi’s latest book —— Bad Samaritans: The ACLU’s Relentless Campaign to Erase Faith from the Public Square —— the ACLU is being fought as never before.
Happily, the ACLU lost a big one in 2007 when two federal appellate courts hit the ACLU where it hurts the most. In denying lawsuits because plaintiffs lack “standing” the amount of tax dollars going to ACLU lawyers in fees is reduced considerably. This is from an article by Jordan Lorence:
Before standing was denied a pack of ACLU lawyers would enhance their incomes by showing up in court and then billing taxpayers for their time. I recall reading that dozens of ACLU lawyers simply show up in local courts and bill the town for their “participation” in the suit. Few towns and counties can afford to pay those astronomical fees; so the ACLU would force settlements by default. Regardless of standing taxpayers should not be forced to pay the ACLU’s fees for bringing political lawsuits:
The court finally reining in the ACLU’s legislative lawsuits is not the end of the ACLU’s destructive interference in other realms of the law.
Before moving on to more precise matters, I want to address this often misunderstood line:
Taken in context Shakespeare was praising lawyers.
I doubt if there are ten adults in America who never heard the line “Kill all the lawyers.” But how many know the reason Dick was suggesting mass murder?
Dick was saying that killing all lawyers was a necessary condition for successful revolution; i.e., putting Jack Cade the clothier on the English throne.
I am not defending lawyers, nor could I. The ACLU is the problem with a blanket endorsement. No one but a liberal can defend ACLU lawyers who foment revolution rather than prevent it. In short: ACLU lawyers are not the kind of lawyers Dick wanted to kill.
The money
Denying standing signaled a major sea change in the ACLU’s access to tax dollars. The problem is: The appellate courts did not go far enough.
Some will argue that the ACLU is entitled to tax dollars because it fights for everybody’s Rights. Not true. The ACLU defends causes and defendants that diminish the Rights of law-abiding Americans. Try to imagine those who think the ACLU is a good thing being forced to support a Christian religion. They would go out of their minds.
And if the ACLU is so wonderful Americans would see it and support it voluntarily. By forcing me to support the ACLU with tax dollars my Rights disappear completely. That is definitely not in line with the Constitution the ACLU always claims it defends.
Parenthetically, it’s no wonder liberals insist the US Constitution is a living, breathing, document. The Socialist priesthood not only believes in their religion’s Right to government funding they can point to tax dollars as proof.
Myths
An article by J. Matt Barber exposes the ACLU’s numerous myths about itself. Barber explains what the Founders meant by the separation of church and state:
Intent at the time seems pretty clear to me. And who would argue that the Founders meant it was okay for Congress to establish non-Christian religions out of the public purse. That’s exactly what Socialists did. In any event, the ACLU defending the first 10 words in the First Amendment is akin to an atheist defending God in a kangaroo court:
The ACLU is an arm of the Socialist religion just as the Society of Jesus is an order in the Roman Catholic Church. At the very least the ACLU is a sect within the broader Socialist/Communist religion just as Christianity, Islam, and other religions have sects.
I especially enjoyed this in Barber’s piece:
I love the phrase “ironic doublespeak.” I hyphenate ironic-doublespeak in order to distinguish it from old-fashioned, no nonsense, doublespeak —— the mainstay of Socialists/Communists posing as leading Democrats.
NOTE: The ACLU is one more result of the foulest president in America’s history 1913 through 1920. I’m not posting his name in the hope a few youngsters will never forget it if they have to look it up.
The ACLU has been at it long enough to have one of their own on the US Supreme Court in the person of Ruth Ginsburg. Other justices fudge a bit on issues near and dear to their hearts. Liberal justices favor broad themes like socialism, non-existent International law, and so on, while Ginsburg is the only one who represents a specific organization advocating a precise religious ideology hidden behind this myth:
Here’s the myth-buster:
Roger Baldwin (1884 - 1981) the ACLU’s first director, laid out the ideology for all time irrespective of the ACLU barring Communists from leadership and staff positions in 1940. There was a reason for his ploy.
By the time WWII ended American Communists knew better than to join the Communist party since membership was the only way they could be defined as a Communist short of a confession. The strategy: Work for communism in every way possible, but don’t join the party.
In order to advance the Communist agenda without being weighed down by party membership the techniques of doublespeak, newspeak, outright lies, and destroying everyone who was wise to them became SOP. American Socialists/Communists along with their pals in the media were so successful in destroying Senator Joseph McCarthy (1908 - 1957) few dared challenge them.
Finally, a counterattack has been mounted on the Internet. Will it succeed in cancelling out the Left’s weapons of personal destruction? My guess is that the Net is already having a positive effect, but there is still a long way to go.
The beauty in Net Warfare is that Socialists do not control it. There are plenty of Libs spewing their garbage on the Net to be sure, but they are not the only game in town as they are in education, entertainment, and the old media.
Last edited:
