Excellent troll post. I tip my hat to you.
When the Zebra fits......
Eww gross. Perv.
Yes, BUT what about the unborn....Hey, killer?
Wow. Are you really going to make this a serious thread?
Okay you little *****. Find a single post I've ever made here supporting abortion. You won't find one. What have you ever done to stop abortion? Do you volunteer time? Do you donate money? Have you ever been to a march for life? Do you think children, once they are born, deserve no help?
Go **** yourself. You disgust me.
And I disgust you, scumbag, baby killer!
Itâs a question pro-aborts endlessly badger pro-lifers with: âIf you so badly want babies to be born, how many are you willing to adopt?â They hope that by casting pro-lifers as somehow not doing enough to give âunwantedâ children a home, they can divert attention away from the deaths theyâre responsible for and guilt a few of us into shutting up. If that reminds you of a child snapping, âIf you love it so much, why donât you marry it?,â thatâs because the challenge is about as sophisticated.
Sorry, but moral high ground doesnât come that cheaply, the primary reason being that it doesnât change the tiny details of a) whoâs making children they donât want in the first place, and b) whoâs actually killing them and perpetuating that killing. Can anyone think of any other scenario where âI should be able to harm someone unless you aid me in some wayâ would be taken even remotely seriously as moral reasoning? If I forbid somebody from stealing my neighborâs car, am I therefore obligated to let the would-be thief borrow my own?
Of course not. Itâs preposterous. Again, pro-aborts are (intentionally) confusing the difference between abstaining from harm and going out of oneâs way to do good. Our obligation to the former doesnât necessarily entail the latter. And just because Person A wonât help Person B, it doesnât give Person C a license to kill Person B. So even if this objection were to reveal that pro-lifers are somehow negligent in this area, it wouldnât legitimize legal abortion.
Itâs certainly true that all people, pro-lifers included, should do their part to find abandoned children homes, including adopting them themselves when they can. But, at the risk of ruining a perfectly good narrative by asking the obvious question, how do pro-aborts know we already arenât? Do they have any reason other than malice to suggest that pro-life Americans arenât adopting at a perfectly respectable rate compared to the rest of the population? Heck, how do we know pro-lifers arenât adopting
more than our âchoiceâ-minded brethren? (After all, conservatives and religious Americans
are more charitable in other ways.)
Personally, Iâm not aware of adoption data to either effect, so if any of our critics can prove theyâve got facts behind the smears, step right up. It is, however, worth noting that even when pro-lifers do exactly what pro-aborts chastise us for allegedly not doing, it doesnât make them hate us any less â just ask
Rep. Michele Bachmann.
Besides, moving on from the macro to the individual level, itâs awfully presumptuous to assume whether the circumstances of a strangerâs personal life â yes, even a pro-lifer â are conducive to providing an orphaned child a good home, whether due to the number of children one already has (conservatives tend to
have more kids than liberals), making too little to handle adoptionâs
steep price tag, being unmarried and therefore unable to provide a two-parent home, or simply because one isnât good with kids.
Lastly, regardless of how many pro-lifers are personally adopting, the fact is that weâve more than stepped up to support adoption â just take a look at Students for Lifeâs
rundown of adoption activism and groups, and compare it to Planned Parenthoodâs
own abortion-to-adoption ratio (fun fact: the United States actually
has more crisis pregnancy centers than Planned Parenthood clinics).
Another day, another shabby excuse for mass slaughter dispatched. Itâs a sad commentary on our culture that there remain any venues where you can be taken seriously badgering someone to take care of a strangerâs child while cherishing the childâs own motherâs right to kill him or her.
Empty pro-choice challenge of the day: âWhy donât you pro-lifers adopt more?â
We would be better off if your mother took advantage of PP!