Dear
JimH52 Thanks for posting this so I can review both sides.
In general I do not understand why Russians would want to hack
and harm Democrats under Clinton if Russia was benefitting
from corrupt dealings by Clinton to hand Uranium over to Russia.
Either the Russians derailing Democrats, by exposing Clinton's corruption
which is her own fault, could be rebels AGAINST the arming of Putin,
or it could be the Russians didn't want Clinton exposing Trump's dealings
as you believe this article was saying was a legitimate investigation of real threats.
On the other side, the "reports of compromising prostitution stories"
that could be used to blackmail Trump were debunked as baseless.
This article states them as true and used as leverage.
This article says no charges in the dossier "have been refuted."
but the rightwing media is reporting that nothing has been substantiated either!
Furthermore, the rightwing is reporting conflicts of interest
such as the report for by political sources, including a husband/wife
relationship with the wife being hired without disclosing this
up front in applying for a warrant based solely on this "dossier"
paid for by politically biased interests, with blatant conflicts, that stood to gain.
They deliberately omitted such disclosures, masking them
with careful legal language, to justify getting a warrant
without a valid investigation of any substantiated charges.
sean hannity said:
And here's what the left and your corrupt media won't tell you: the FISA judge was never told that Hillary Clinton was paying for the phony dossier containing Russian intelligence lies about Donald Trump. And they don’t seem to care that it was first used to try to influence an election, then to get a warrant to spy on an opposition candidate.
The incestuous ties between Fusion, Steele, the Clinton campaign and the Obama Justice Department are alarming. Clinton hired Fusion, which hired Steele. Steele was working with the FBI at the same time. The wife of a top Justice Department official, Bruce Ohr, was hired by Fusion to work with Steele.
Which way is it?
Why would Russia have motives to either derail Clinton
if the uranium deals were so beneficial?
The common factor in any of these charges of "collusion"
is Clinton wanting to bring down Trump to get elected.
The other arguments seem to run into conflicts,
where there was no motivation for those things to take place.
I don't get it, can someone please explain it to me
in other terms besides Democrats trying to derail Trump???