New York Liberals Clueless On Terrorism

protectionist

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
61,678
Reaction score
21,802
Points
2,250
Once again, New York City gets hit with a terrorist attack, and once again New York "leaders" bungle their response to it. Both New York governor Andrew Cuomo, and mayor Bill DeBlasio express wrong ideas.

Cuomo said "...if we change our lives...then they win, and we lose." Change lives how ? By no longer making yourselves open targets, with all of NYC one gigantic gun-free zone ? By allowing law-abiding New Yorkers, trained in firearms, to carry concealed handguns, this would make them win ?

Not hardly, Andy. In fact, it would do just the opposite. It would provide a deterrent to keep them away, and would stop them, if they do attack. So, what do these illustrious protectors do ? They eliminate a good means of protection, by having New Yorkers unarmed and defenseless, when the terrorists show up.

The mayor deBlasio said there will be extensive additional employments of NYPD officers in the days ahead. That's good, but why not have extensive employments of armed citizens, who can deter crime, and act when needed ? Many of these could also be former police, National Guard, US military, ex-security guards, etc, as well.
 
Is there anything NY Bed Wetters aren't clueless about?

A lot more people would die from lack of healthcare, than from terrorism.

I personally stand against senseless death of anyone in my country.

That's why I don't want Muslims here, nor do I want lack of healthcare to continue killing people in my country that can be saved.

Commonsense.
 
Is there anything NY Bed Wetters aren't clueless about?
You might be surprised how smart/cool they think they are.

What do you know, an anti-Racist, and a half Hispanic persona mocking New York.

I think your kind are the issue with New York.

New York could be awesome, but there's just too much racial trash here.
 
Once again, New York City gets hit with a terrorist attack, and once again New York "leaders" bungle their response to it. Both New York governor Andrew Cuomo, and mayor Bill DeBlasio express wrong ideas.

Cuomo said "...if we change our lives...then they win, and we lose." Change lives how ? By no longer making yourselves open targets, with all of NYC one gigantic gun-free zone ? By allowing law-abiding New Yorkers, trained in firearms, to carry concealed handguns, this would make them win ?

Not hardly, Andy. In fact, it would do just the opposite. It would provide a deterrent to keep them away, and would stop them, if they do attack. So, what do these illustrious protectors do ? They eliminate a good means of protection, by having New Yorkers unarmed and defenseless, when the terrorists show up.

The mayor deBlasio said there will be extensive additional employments of NYPD officers in the days ahead. That's good, but why not have extensive employments of armed citizens, who can deter crime, and act when needed ? Many of these could also be former police, National Guard, US military, ex-security guards, etc, as well.

Has it occurred to you that people, in general, dont actually want to carry guns?

This thread is nothing but disrespectful, gun-nut grave dancing, and it's graves of innocent Americans you are dancing on. And you Cletuses are violating your own moratorium on talking about gun laws after an incident. For shame, Cletuses!
 
Once again, New York City gets hit with a terrorist attack, and once again New York "leaders" bungle their response to it. Both New York governor Andrew Cuomo, and mayor Bill DeBlasio express wrong ideas.

Cuomo said "...if we change our lives...then they win, and we lose." Change lives how ? By no longer making yourselves open targets, with all of NYC one gigantic gun-free zone ? By allowing law-abiding New Yorkers, trained in firearms, to carry concealed handguns, this would make them win ?

Not hardly, Andy. In fact, it would do just the opposite. It would provide a deterrent to keep them away, and would stop them, if they do attack. So, what do these illustrious protectors do ? They eliminate a good means of protection, by having New Yorkers unarmed and defenseless, when the terrorists show up.

The mayor deBlasio said there will be extensive additional employments of NYPD officers in the days ahead. That's good, but why not have extensive employments of armed citizens, who can deter crime, and act when needed ? Many of these could also be former police, National Guard, US military, ex-security guards, etc, as well.

Has it occurred to you that people, in general, dont actually want to carry guns?

This thread is nothing but disrespectful, gun-nut grave dancing, and it's graves of innocent Americans you are dancing on. And you Cletuses are violating your own moratorium on talking about gun laws after an incident. For shame, Cletuses!
Indeed their are a lot of stupid people who still think the police can protect them.
 
If only they went after Manafort faster and sooner
 
Have the people who make these ridiculous proposals ever been to a big city, much less NYC?
You can't have a bunch of half-cocked gun-toters shooting at each other in a city of over 8 million people.
You people with your John Wayne fantasies. Put the remote down, pardner.
 
Once again, New York City gets hit with a terrorist attack, and once again New York "leaders" bungle their response to it. Both New York governor Andrew Cuomo, and mayor Bill DeBlasio express wrong ideas.

Cuomo said "...if we change our lives...then they win, and we lose." Change lives how ? By no longer making yourselves open targets, with all of NYC one gigantic gun-free zone ? By allowing law-abiding New Yorkers, trained in firearms, to carry concealed handguns, this would make them win ?

Not hardly, Andy. In fact, it would do just the opposite. It would provide a deterrent to keep them away, and would stop them, if they do attack. So, what do these illustrious protectors do ? They eliminate a good means of protection, by having New Yorkers unarmed and defenseless, when the terrorists show up.

The mayor deBlasio said there will be extensive additional employments of NYPD officers in the days ahead. That's good, but why not have extensive employments of armed citizens, who can deter crime, and act when needed ? Many of these could also be former police, National Guard, US military, ex-security guards, etc, as well.

Has it occurred to you that people, in general, dont actually want to carry guns?

This thread is nothing but disrespectful, gun-nut grave dancing, and it's graves of innocent Americans you are dancing on. And you Cletuses are violating your own moratorium on talking about gun laws after an incident. For shame, Cletuses!
Indeed their are a lot of stupid people who still think the police can protect them.

And then you have the idiots who think they are going to stop a terrorist with a handgun...nothing but a bunch of manbabies who watched one too many episodes of Walker, Texas Ranger....
 
Have the people who make these ridiculous proposals ever been to a big city, much less NYC?
You can't have a bunch of half-cocked gun-toters shooting at each other in a city of over 8 million people.
You people with your John Wayne fantasies. Put the remote down, pardner.


You libs said similar shit when Giuliani started his Broken Window approach on law enforcement.


You were just as certain then.
 
15th post
Ugh I'm getting so jaded by their stupid that sometimes I think we should just let the fuckers in and let them take out our trash at will.

After all, terrorists aren't going to hit our rural towns, they're not going to blow up our family farms, they're not going to attack in low density locations. OUR families could be pretty safe from these fuckers if we just stay out of the high density places they're likely to attack... Kind of like I wouldn't be booking a trip to the ME anytime soon, just skip visiting New York and shit right?

Still I feel a bit... "first they came for the urban hot spots..."
 
Has it occurred to you that people, in general, dont actually want to carry guns?

This thread is nothing but disrespectful, gun-nut grave dancing, and it's graves of innocent Americans you are dancing on. And you Cletuses are violating your own moratorium on talking about gun laws after an incident. For shame, Cletuses!
I know of no "moratorium" of talking about guns (or anything else) I'm not talking about people who don't want to carry a gun, Mr Subject-Change, I'm taking about those who DO want to carry them, who are law abiding, trained and responsible. (as is the case in most places across America)

Also talking about millions of people whose lives can and would be saved by them - as has already occured in Garland, TX, Moore, OK, Los Angles Airport, and many other instances.
 
Have the people who make these ridiculous proposals ever been to a big city, much less NYC?
You can't have a bunch of half-cocked gun-toters shooting at each other in a city of over 8 million people.
You people with your John Wayne fantasies. Put the remote down, pardner.
And what deluded/unhinged gun-free zone city do YOU hail from ? Maybe if you lived in a normal place, you'd know many "gun-toters" who are law-abiding, responsible citizens, who don't shoot at each other, or anyone else, except in self-defense. Maybe then you'd be able to think normally.
 
And then you have the idiots who think they are going to stop a terrorist with a handgun...nothing but a bunch of manbabies who watched one too many episodes of Walker, Texas Ranger....
Terrorists and other criminals HAVE BEEN stopped with a handgun, multiple times in America. Your liberal OMISSION media omitted that, huh ? Here's one case to fill you in >>

2002 Los Angeles International Airport shooting - Wikipedia

Here's a longer list >>

20 Times Bad Guys Were Stopped by Armed Citizens in 2016 - Breitbart
 
Back
Top Bottom