New Court Case Could Change the Way we Vote

[Lastamender]

The Post Office should not handle ballots. Well, what do you know. Let's hope this moves quickly.

 

[Kilroy2]

Okay so Postal office which was established before the Constitution was even written somehow violates the constitution that was written after the postal service was created.

So since then they have used it and now someone has discovered that it is in violation of the constitution

Well its up to the supreme court to make that determination.

With the election in a few months , I guess they should get to it. Well let see if

they agree with the general.

 

[Oddball]

The postal union endorses demoncrats...I'm sure they'll be all on the up-and-up and shit!

 

[Kilroy2]

Okay I see now

Postal Union endorsed Biden

Okay but that is just the union. with members.

So because they endorsed Biden, then they must be corrupt

If they said that they endorsed Trump would that still make them corrupt

Well its the union with postal employees and not the entity US Post Office.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Rules don’t apply to democrats.

 

[jackflash]

The postal union endorses demoncrats...I'm sure they'll be all on the up-and-up and shit!

Hopefully the public service unions will be exterminated during the upcoming Trump administration.

 

[1srelluc]

Well it does seem to go against basic "chain of custody" norms.

A lot of ill could be done by dem union employees starting from the carrier/PO you drop a ballot off at, to the sorting hub, at the PO it ends-up at, to the last carrier that drops it off at the destination.

All could shit-can ballots from certain red areas.

More the reason to make election day great again.

 

[Kilroy2]

Unless there is a clear case or can be proven that this happen then it will be dismissed

Under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS), many Federal government bargaining unit employees are eligible for union membership if there is a union at their worksite.

Claiming that democrats postman do not do their job has to be proven.

not by innuendo

Republicans mailman can do the same thing

absentee ballots by mail is perfectly legal

Thus people have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that mailmen will open a ballot then dispose of it or change it.

accusation have to be proven but republicans do not believe in the rule of law

Then Republicans will have to understand chain of custody

They have attacked this in the past.

"FIX IS IN: Arizona Ballots Make Stop at Runbeck Printing Company to Scan Ballot Envelopes Before They Are Sent to County -- WITH NO OBSERVERS."

Fact check: Chain of custody for Maricopa County ballots was secure

A viral video purporting to show ballots breaking chain of custody in Arizona is wrong, experts and officials told USA TODAY.

www.usatoday.com

So this is nothing new, republicans claim of cheating.

They make these claims when their guy loses. But have nothing to say when their guy wins.

Trump won an election under the same process

They would have to prove chain of customs was broken

 

[Lastamender]

Unless there is a clear case or can be proven that this happen then it will be dismissed

Under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS), many Federal government bargaining unit employees are eligible for union membership if there is a union at their worksite.

Claiming that democrats postman do not do their job has to be proven.

not by innuendo

Republicans mailman can do the same thing

absentee ballots by mail is perfectly legal

Thus people have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that mailmen will open a ballot then dispose of it or change it.

accusation have to be proven but republicans do not believe in the rule of law

Then Republicans will have to understand chain of custody

They have attacked this in the past.

"FIX IS IN: Arizona Ballots Make Stop at Runbeck Printing Company to Scan Ballot Envelopes Before They Are Sent to County -- WITH NO OBSERVERS."

Fact check: Chain of custody for Maricopa County ballots was secure

A viral video purporting to show ballots breaking chain of custody in Arizona is wrong, experts and officials told USA TODAY.

www.usatoday.com

So this is nothing new, republicans claim of cheating.

They make these claims when their guy loses. But have nothing to say when their guy wins.

A link from complicit media in the cover up is the same bullshit we have heard for years. They were not believable then and they certainly are not now.

 

[Kilroy2]

A link from complicit media in the cover up is the same bullshit we have heard for years. They were not believable then and they certainly are not now.

what still fixated on the Arizona thing

Yet you fail to understand that you guys have not proven anything.

link just said that the union is valid.

link explains chain of custody for those who do not know what it is.

Union is nothing to your case. You have to prove that the vote was tampered with and chain of custody was broken

Still as you guys worry that Trump will lose thus it will be fun to watch

Hey get your "election stolen bumper stickers" before they are all sold out.

final countdown in a few days


Nice to see republicans already claiming cheating before results are known

 

[Lastamender]

Yet you fail to understand that you guys have not proven anything.

link just said that the union is valid.

link explains chain of custody for those who do not know what it is.

Union is nothing to your case. You have to prove that the vote was tampered with and chain of custody was broken

Still as you guys worry that Trump will lose thus it will be fun to watch

Hey get your "election stolen bumper stickers" before they are all sold out.

final countdown in a few days


Nice to see republicans already claiming cheating before results are known

Proof happens in the court. Has the case been heard yet?

 

[Kilroy2]

So your admitting there is no proof

proof already exists but its up the court to determine if it valid.

Unless you can proof that chain of custody was broken and the vote was tampered with

It is just a belief of people getting nervous in the final countdown

Hey don will claim that the election was stolen once again.

See ya at the riots

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

So your admitting there is no proof

Kinda hard to find when no one looks for it.

 

[Kilroy2]

Kinda hard to find when no one looks for it.

;yeah but you guys are looking for it

in every year when your guy loses

You all know the story about the little boy who cried wolf all the time and how that ends.

Yes, courts heard ‘evidence’ of alleged 2020 election fraud

Former President Donald Trump lost the presidential election to Joe Biden in November 2020. Unwilling to accept that def

www.politifact.com

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

;yeah but you guys are looking for it

in every year when your guy loses

Yes, courts heard ‘evidence’ of alleged 2020 election fraud

Former President Donald Trump lost the presidential election to Joe Biden in November 2020. Unwilling to accept that def

www.politifact.com

Only one year.
51 million unaccounted, unvetted, non-electioneering-proof mail-in votes flipping the voting pattern after midnight in five swing states for a candidate who never polled higher than 2% in previous attempts with a running mate who was rejected by 97% of the party in the current cycle and somehow breaking the popular vote record by 20% against an incumbent who increased on his winning total by 17%.
Only response by media to these elephants shitting in the room was to suggest ‘election deniers’.
You’re dishonest.

 

[Kilroy2]

Only one year.
51 million unaccounted, unvetted, non-electioneering-proof mail-in votes flipping the voting pattern after midnight in five swing states for a candidate who never polled higher than 2% in previous attempts with a running mate who was rejected by 97% of the party in the current cycle and somehow breaking the popular vote record by 20% against an incumbent who increased on his winning total by 17%.
Only response by media to these elephants shitting in the room was to suggest ‘election deniers’.
You’re dishonest.

Yet you did not provide a source.

who is dishonest now ?

 

[Kilroy2]

what they seek or what they claim -- For instance, the U.S. Postal Service should NOT/NOT be in the business of handling ballots (PERIOD!)

a few weeks before the election republicans file a complaint.

Then who should handle mail in ballots?

Postal secret service

So what is the SC going to do this late in the game. invalidate all mail in votes?

 

[Oddball]

;yeah but you guys are looking for it

in every year when your guy loses

You all know the story about the little boy who cried wolf all the time and how that ends.

Yes, courts heard ‘evidence’ of alleged 2020 election fraud

Former President Donald Trump lost the presidential election to Joe Biden in November 2020. Unwilling to accept that def

www.politifact.com

Politifact is leftoid partisan shit.

That said, where the courts did hear evidence (i.e. Wisconsin) they ruled in favor of Trump.

 

[Kilroy2]

Politifact is leftoid partisan shit.

That said, where the courts did hear evidence (i.e. Wisconsin) they ruled in favor of Trump.

really

Wisconsin Supreme Court Majority Rules Against President Trump, Won´t Invalidate Ballots

In a decision addressing President Donald Trump’s bid to overturn election results by invalidating more than 200,000 votes in Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled (4-3) that the Trump campaign is not entitled to that relief.

www.wisbar.org

DECEMBER 16, 2020

Wisconsin Supreme Court Majority Rules Against President Trump, Won't Invalidate Ballots​

In a decision addressing President Donald Trump’s bid to overturn election results by invalidating more than 200,000 votes in Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled (4-3) that the Trump campaign is not entitled to that relief.

Hey it was a close vote but you know a source would further your case.

• Justice Dallet and Justice Karofsky wrote a short concurring opinion to note President Trump’s claims of fraud.
  “The President failed to point to even one vote cast in this election by an ineligible voter; yet he asks this court to disenfranchise over 220,000 voters,” they wrote. “The circuit court, whose decision we affirm, found no evidence of any fraud.”
  

  ---

  • Comments (0)
  SHARE THIS:

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Yet you did not provide a source.

who is dishonest now ?

You are. And you’re OK with it which is even creepier.
You like losing money. You like making others lose money and forcing the world’s poorest to starve as you abet the demise of the American middle class. You and your lemming brethren are taking everyone else off the cliff with you.
Apparently my 51% was likely an underestimation.
Do the math…

What Absentee Voting Looked Like In All 50 States

It was historically popular -- and historically Democratic.

fivethirtyeight.com