trumptman
VIP Member
- Jun 21, 2020
- 101
- 255
- 63
Nearly 40% of Stanford undergraduates claim they’re disabled. I’m one of them
One of the most prestigious universities in the US offers perks to those who say they have ADHD, night terrors, even gluten intolerance. You’d be stupid not to game the system
In 2023, one month into my freshman year at Stanford University, an upperclassman was showing me her dorm room — a prized single in one of the nicest buildings on campus. As she took me around her space, which included a private bathroom, a walk-in shower and a great view of Hoover Tower, she casually mentioned that she had lived in a single all four years she had attended Stanford.
I was surprised. Most people don't get the privilege of a single room until they reach their senior year.
That's when my friend gave me a tip: Stanford had granted her "a disability accommodation".
She, of course, didn't have a disability. She knew it. I knew it. But she had figured out early what most Stanford students eventually learn: the Office of Accessible Education will give students a single room, extra time on tests and even exemptions from academic requirements if they qualify as "disabled".
This is a perfect microcosm for the modern Democrat Party. Empathy as a pathway to Entitlement. You claim elitism but also claim disability.
But at Stanford, almost no one talks about the system with shame. Rather, we openly discuss, strategise and even joke about it. At a university of savvy optimisers, the feeling is that if you aren't getting accommodations, you haven't tried hard enough.
Another student told me that special "accommodations are so prevalent that they effectively only punish the honest". Academic accommodations, they added, help "students get ahead … which puts a huge proportion of the class on an unfair playing ground".
DEI, disabilities, the whole letter crew (LGBTQIA++) are all just paths to optimize their ability to game the system with no shame. It is just "savvy optimization" and only punish the "honest" people who won't lie.
Administrators seem powerless to reform the system and frankly don't seem to care. How do you prove someone doesn't have anxiety? How do you verify they don't need extra time on a test? How do you challenge a religious dietary claim without risking a discrimination lawsuit?
I often think back to that conversation with my upperclassman friend. She wasn't proud of gaming the system and she wasn't ashamed either. She was simply rational. The university had created a set of incentives and she had simply responded to them.
That's what strikes me most about the accommodation explosion at Stanford and similar schools. The students aren't exactly cheating and if they are, can you blame them? Stanford has made gaming the system the logical choice. When accommodations mean the difference between a cramped triple and your own room, when extra test time can boost your grade point average, opting out feels like self-sabotage. Who would make their lives harder when the easiest option is just a 30-minute Zoom call away?
Another perfect microcosm. They system can't be challenged or changed. What happens at some point... you get someone who is willing to blow it up since it can't adapt.
Gaming the system is the logical choice. If you don't game, you are self-sabotaging. Why make your life harder when you can just lie and make it easier?
From day care centers, to autism centers, to hospice centers to SNAP, EBT, Social Security Disability and more, this is increasingly the norm in America and the only person who is punished are those who are too honest or who just believe they shouldn't game the system.
You hear the same excuses for illegal immigration. "How will you afford your construction, your lawn care, someone to pick you vegetables and clean your house (if you don't game the system?)
We are getting to the point, according to the facts presented in the article where the "Elites" will both claim they are elite but also entitled and disabled and no one should be "honest" enough and by that they mean stupid enough to question that hypocrisy and contradiction.
I'm willing to question in. In fact I'm willing to say that in a system that can't change or be challenged, I'm more than willing to risk the damage and harm of blowing it up. I'm not the one starving kids if SNAP can't be reformed. They frauds are the one risking it. I'm not the one harming people with legitimate disabilities. The people exploiting it for their own benefit are the ones harming them.
Empathy as a weapon needs to be stopped and those who exploit it need to be seen as vile people engaged in disgusting actions.
If we can't fix or question it. Destroy it. That's the norm and the modern Democrat Party that lives and breaths this stuff must either get out of the way or take their lumps when that creative destruction they prompted comes to pass.