NBA 3-Pointer Problem Being focused on... what's the solution?

Mr. Friscus

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
7,602
Reaction score
8,089
Points
2,138
A few things have happened that have spearheaded discussions about 3-pointers in the NBA.

1. For years, 3's have skyrocketed upwards, and I'd say a majority of fans don't like players just running up and down the floor jacking up 3's.
2. The other night, a team made like 30+ 3's in one game, a record.
3. Also the other night, 72 3's were shot in a game.
4. A dead carcus, otherwise known as Adam Silver NBA Commisioner, said there needs to be more balance in the game.

All of these are true and point to what most fans want... less 3's. But how do you do it?

First off, a few things:
1. We are seeing the culmination of players who have trained their entire lives to value the 3 as a routine, expected shot, and perfecting it. This wasn't true in the 80's, 90's, even 2000's. During those times even "sharp shooters" weren't jacking up 10-15 3's a game as many do today. Quick, widespread jacking up of 3's started with the 7-second suns, but was then taken to another level by the Rockets in the 2010's, who went straight Moneyball and pretty much said "Layup or 3".
2. The data says to do exactly what teams are doing. analysis says that an in-rhythm 3 has just as good of a chance to be made as contested mid-range jumpers. So basically, it's either 5-8ft shots/layups/dunks or trying to get a 3 pointer.

So there's no general reason for teams to stop. This is where the carcus, Adam Silver, has to come in. Some ideas?
1. Make the court wider, and back the line up by 2 ft. The NBA has made major changes previously. Hell, they went from no 3 point to having one.. they also moved the 3 point line closer in the mid 90's when scoring was down for 2 years, then moved it back to the original distance.
2. Make a number of 3's a team can shoot that can count as a 3 before they just become long 2 point shots.

What do you guys think? How do you solve the 3-point crisis?
 
There is no way to solve it. The game lost its beauty and finesse that came with the battles underneath the basket.

Unless they want to make it a "bodychecking zone", the 3 pointers will continue and people will turn it off.
 
I remember a soft ball league. You were only allowed X amount of home runs. Maybe only X amount of 3's count as a 3. Might make it interesting. You might want to save 1 or 2 for the end of the game.

Just a thought since you asked.
 
There is no way to solve it. The game lost its beauty and finesse that came with the battles underneath the basket.

Unless they want to make it a "bodychecking zone", the 3 pointers will continue and people will turn it off.
There is. All sports have solved balance problems

1. MLB lowered the mound height after Bob Gibson and other pitchers were mowing down hitters with crazy low ERA's.
2. MLB installed a pitching clock recently because the majority of fans agreed the game was too slow and they didn't like 3-4 hour games.
3. As mentioned earlier, NBA installed a 3-point line out of nowhere.
4. The NFL installed the 2 point conversion
5. The NBA outlawed hand checking and certain defenses.
6. MLB outlawed "the shift"

This happens, and it can be fixed. The question is, how.
 
A few things have happened that have spearheaded discussions about 3-pointers in the NBA.

1. For years, 3's have skyrocketed upwards, and I'd say a majority of fans don't like players just running up and down the floor jacking up 3's.
2. The other night, a team made like 30+ 3's in one game, a record.
3. Also the other night, 72 3's were shot in a game.
4. A dead carcus, otherwise known as Adam Silver NBA Commisioner, said there needs to be more balance in the game.

All of these are true and point to what most fans want... less 3's. But how do you do it?

First off, a few things:
1. We are seeing the culmination of players who have trained their entire lives to value the 3 as a routine, expected shot, and perfecting it. This wasn't true in the 80's, 90's, even 2000's. During those times even "sharp shooters" weren't jacking up 10-15 3's a game as many do today. Quick, widespread jacking up of 3's started with the 7-second suns, but was then taken to another level by the Rockets in the 2010's, who went straight Moneyball and pretty much said "Layup or 3".
2. The data says to do exactly what teams are doing. analysis says that an in-rhythm 3 has just as good of a chance to be made as contested mid-range jumpers. So basically, it's either 5-8ft shots/layups/dunks or trying to get a 3 pointer.

So there's no general reason for teams to stop. This is where the carcus, Adam Silver, has to come in. Some ideas?
1. Make the court wider, and back the line up by 2 ft. The NBA has made major changes previously. Hell, they went from no 3 point to having one.. they also moved the 3 point line closer in the mid 90's when scoring was down for 2 years, then moved it back to the original distance.
2. Make a number of 3's a team can shoot that can count as a 3 before they just become long 2 point shots.

What do you guys think? How do you solve the 3-point crisis?
Get rid of the analysts and statisticians in the NBA teams front offices.
 
I remember a soft ball league. You were only allowed X amount of home runs. Maybe only X amount of 3's count as a 3. Might make it interesting. You might want to save 1 or 2 for the end of the game.

Just a thought since you asked.
I think it's a solution to consider.

I've long maintained that to get some interest in an NBA All-Star game, they should play one that has no 3-point line. A return to original basketball play. No spacing, watching 3-point gurus take an extra dribble in... more mid-range, more post-up. It would peak my interest.
 
I didn't know there was an issue. I suppose they could move the line back a foot.
It needs to be 2 feet at least. Way too many players can simply guide (not shoot) 3-pointers in from distance with ease. There needs to be a risk-reward to the 3.
 
I think it's a solution to consider.

I've long maintained that to get some interest in an NBA All-Star game, they should play one that has no 3-point line. A return to original basketball play. No spacing, watching 3-point gurus take an extra dribble in... more mid-range, more post-up. It would peak my interest.
The NBA All Star game is the only showcase where I don't care what the stakes are. What the purpose is. The objective should be to showcase the TALENT.
Regardless of what I think about the NBA regular season and playoffs, the ASG should be a fun, non-competitive display of what the NBA COULD offer.
 
The NBA All Star game is the only showcase where I don't care what the stakes are. What the purpose is. The objective should be to showcase the TALENT.
Regardless of what I think about the NBA regular season and playoffs, the ASG should be a fun, non-competitive display of what the NBA COULD offer.

No defense?
 
Most teams can’t do that. Celtics are one of the few that can get away with it
 
I didn't know there was an issue. I suppose they could move the line back a foot.

This will just create longer 3s. These guys are firing from everywhere now.

I think of the FGs in the NFL too. 50+ yards seems to be routine now.
 
The NBA All Star game is the only showcase where I don't care what the stakes are. What the purpose is. The objective should be to showcase the TALENT.
Regardless of what I think about the NBA regular season and playoffs, the ASG should be a fun, non-competitive display of what the NBA COULD offer.
Watching a bunch of guys not try and basically perform a modified lay-up line and practice-court 3 pointers for a full game is not anything of interest.
 
Get rid of the 3-Point line.

Old School Basketball.
 
This will just create longer 3s. These guys are firing from everywhere now.

I think of the FGs in the NFL too. 50+ yards seems to be routine now.
No, it will reduce 3's from some players, and it will open up more space for postup play.
 
and how would you mandate that LOL
I couldn't. But the NBA will eventually experience a decline...because the bulk of consumers will get bored with it.
Boston Celtics example.

1984 - Celtics win with defense, a tough, gritty offense, passing and ball handling that leaves you dizzy, and the occasional 3 that pumped everyone up. One of the most satisfying NBA championships I can remember.
2024 - Celtics...toss up a bunch of 3's...and make most of them (admittedly). Play decent enough defense. Sleepwalk through playoffs and win the NBA championship....B-O-R-E-D!!
 
Back
Top Bottom