Myth #1..... Israel is "Stolen Land"

[Divine Wind]

Jews gave up all their land in Palestine a long time ago. If I buy a house that's built on old foundations, is the former owners descendants allowed to come and steal it back off of me?

Gave it up or had it stolen from them?

 

[Monnagonna]

Oh! When are arabs vacating the real estate?

A good example of your unintelligent posts.

Au contraire, it's a sign of my wisdom, of course.

Don't hurt yourself patting yourself on the back, lol.

 

[Monnagonna]

Jews gave up all their land in Palestine a long time ago. If I buy a house that's built on old foundations, is the former owners descendants allowed to come and steal it back off of me?

Gave it up or had it stolen from them?

The Palestinians had the jews stolen from them?

 

[JStone]

Jews gave up all their land in Palestine a long time ago. If I buy a house that's built on old foundations, is the former owners descendants allowed to come and steal it back off of me?

Gave it up or had it stolen from them?

The Palestinians had the jews stolen from them?

The Fakestinians are from Arabia, birdbrain.

Jews have lived in Israel since at least 1200 BCE, verified by the archaeological record, 3000 years before there were even Fakestinians.

You should have been aborted, you hot mess.

 

[Shogun]

NEVER GONNA GET IT.....

 

[JStone]

NEVER GONNA GET IT.....[/COOR][/]

You live in the US of Torah, psycho.

US President John Adams
I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation. If I were an atheist, and believed in blind eternal fate, I should still believe that fate had ordained the Jews to be the most essential instrument for civilizing the nations. If I were an atheist of the other sect, who believe, or pretend to believe that all is ordered by chance, I should believe that chance had ordered the Jews to preserve and propagate to all mankind the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise, almighty sovereign of the universe, which I believe to be the great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization.

 

[Divine Wind]

NEVER GONNA GET IT.....

http://z.about.com/d/judaism/1/0/B/8/4344.jpg

Unless the Muslim radicals start a war with the West, then all bets are off. There are two places on Earth where the West could be forced into another World War. One is in the Far East with China the other is in the Middle East with the Fundamentalist clowns who use terrorism to murder innocent men, women and children. Since they even murder Muslims, which is a direct violation of the Holy Qur'an, then they can only be working for Satan whether they fully understand it or not.

 

[Monnagonna]

Sorry Div., but we're already in WWIII, just look at allthe countries who are at war with each other on one side:

US, Canada, France, England, Poland, Australia, Germany, Israel, and all the other NATO countries.
vs
Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Palestinians, Libya, Lebanon, and to some extent, Somalia, Yemen, North Korea and the US still occupies Japan, Germany, the Phillipines and a bunch of others. And recently beat the shit out of Yugoslavia, Panama and Granada.
And now the Chinese are waging cyberwar against the US. Ok, not all these actions are related, but an awful lot of them are.

How many more countries do you need to get involved in war to call it a world war?

 

[Divine Wind]

Sorry Div., but we're already in WWIII, just look at allthe countries who are at war with each other on one side

By that logic, we've been in a world war since the beginning of civilization.

To equate the conflicts you've mentioned with WWI or WWII is like comparing a drive-by gang shooting to 9/11.

We lost almost half a million Americans in WWII. Over 50,000 in Viet Nam. We've lost a tenth of the Viet Nam causalities in the WOT and about 1% of the WWII deaths. Despite the tragedies we are experiencing in our time, the world is actually becoming both better and more peaceful.

 

[Monnagonna]

Sorry Div., but we're already in WWIII, just look at allthe countries who are at war with each other on one side

By that logic, we've been in a world war since the beginning of civilization.

To equate the conflicts you've mentioned with WWI or WWII is like comparing a drive-by gang shooting to 9/11.

We lost almost half a million Americans in WWII. Over 50,000 in Viet Nam. We've lost a tenth of the Viet Nam causalities in the WOT and about 1% of the WWII deaths. Despite the tragedies we are experiencing in our time, the world is actually becoming both better and more peaceful.

We have the US, Canada, England, Germany, the Dutch, Polish.... fighting pretty much the whole arab world. Worldwide air travel is compromised... That's not WWIII?

 

[docmauser1]

Sorry Div., but we're already in WWIII, just look at allthe countries who are at war with each other on one side: US, Canada, France, England, Poland, Australia, Germany, Israel, and all the other NATO countries. vs Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Palestinians, Libya, Lebanon, and to some extent, Somalia, Yemen, North Korea and the US still occupies Japan, Germany, the Phillipines and a bunch of others. And recently beat the shit out of Yugoslavia, Panama and Granada. And now the Chinese are waging cyberwar against the US. Ok, not all these actions are related, but an awful lot of them are. How many more countries do you need to get involved in war to call it a world was.

Indeed, we just can't afford getting distracted by the occupational noises noisy palistanians make about their occupation.

 

[Divine Wind]

We have the US, Canada, England, Germany, the Dutch, Polish.... fighting pretty much the whole arab world. Worldwide air travel is compromised... That's not WWIII?

Not by a long shot.....but I can see why some people think it is.

 

[Monnagonna]

Sorry Div., but we're already in WWIII, just look at allthe countries who are at war with each other on one side: US, Canada, France, England, Poland, Australia, Germany, Israel, and all the other NATO countries. vs Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Palestinians, Libya, Lebanon, and to some extent, Somalia, Yemen, North Korea and the US still occupies Japan, Germany, the Phillipines and a bunch of others. And recently beat the shit out of Yugoslavia, Panama and Granada. And now the Chinese are waging cyberwar against the US. Ok, not all these actions are related, but an awful lot of them are. How many more countries do you need to get involved in war to call it a world was.

Indeed, we just can't afford getting distracted by the occupational noises noisy palistanians make about their occupation.

doc, the reason we're fighting the arab world is precisely because of the conflict in Palestine. I wouldn't care if the israeli nuked every last ******* arab. The thing that I don't like is being dragged into their fight on purpose then being told that it has nothing to do with them (the israelis).

 

[Monnagonna]

We have the US, Canada, England, Germany, the Dutch, Polish.... fighting pretty much the whole arab world. Worldwide air travel is compromised... That's not WWIII?

Not by a long shot.....but I can see why some people think it is.

So how many countries fighting in the same war does it take for you to call it a world war?

 

[Ropey]

^^ Research world wars.

World war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A world war is a war affecting the majority of the world's most powerful and populous nations. World wars span multiple countries on multiple continents, with battles fought in multiple theaters, and last for multiple years. The term has usually been applied to two conflicts of unprecedented scale that occurred during the 20th century, World War I (1914–1918) and World War II (1939–1945), although in retrospect a number of earlier conflicts may be regarded as "world wars". The other most common usage of the term is in the context of World War III, a phrase usually used to describe any hypothetical future global conflict.

 

[Divine Wind]

^^ Research world wars.

World war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Agreed.

The term has usually been applied to two conflicts of unprecedented scale

It's not the number of countries involved, but the scale of the conflict.

 

[Ropey]

^^ The definitive word in your quote is "usually". Usually, not always, so it's both countries and scale of conflicts.

 

[AmericanFirst]

So, if I don't respond any further, you'll leave?

Nope.

I only leave when I'm ready.

Usually that means after I let you stand up and put your pants back on.

Or give this board a little flogging.
-

I guess that we will eventually see the second installment of Abu Afak's Myths, whether or not I put up substantial attempts at rebuttal, right?

I'll be waiting.

Why do you call them myths? Israel has never been the palestinians, no matter what they claim.

 

[Monnagonna]

abu afuckyou is an israeli apologist.

 

[docmauser1]

doc, the reason we're fighting the arab world is precisely because of the conflict in Palestine. I wouldn't care if the israeli nuked every last ******* arab. The thing that I don't like is being dragged into their fight on purpose then being told that it has nothing to do with them (the israelis).

That's why we just can't afford getting distracted by the occupational noises noisy palistanians make about their occupation.