Move Over CNN - NYT Perpetuated Hillary LIE...Their Word Is Worthless, No Credibility

[easyt65]

The Media Perpetuated A Clinton Lie For 9 Months. What It Means For The Russia Narrative

"When Hillary Clinton claimed “17 intelligence agencies” agree on Russian meddling in the third presidential debate, a host of media outlets including The New York Times rated the claim as 100 percent true. Nine months later, those same outlets say the stat is obviously false, and there’s been a “simple” explanation as to why all along.

A closer look at how the claim survived and thrived over those nine months reveals a startling lack of skepticism in the press when it comes to the Russia narrative. The truth is the great majority of the 17 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community had nothing to do with the investigation and made no judgments about the matter."



"...its star political reporter recently reiterated the false claim as she was in the middle of writing an article characterizing President Trump as stubbornly foolish."
-- "Her story was later corrected..."


EVERY ATTEMPT TO CLAIM 'Trump-Russia' Collusion has been DEBUNKED, DIS-CREDITED, Proven FALSE!

No Crime.
No Criminal Activity.
No Collusion.
No Evidence.
No Credibility.
No Case.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I don't trust any of the media

 

[koshergrl]

None of them are worth two shits, they never have been.

 

[mamooth]

Whenever a Trumpflake makes a new meltdown thread, an angel gets his wings.

 

[miketx]

Whenever a Trumpflake makes a new meltdown thread, an angel gets his wings.

Most all the media is not to be trusted.

 

[easyt65]

Whenever a Trumpflake makes a new meltdown thread, an angel gets his wings.

Thank you for demonstrating the definition of 'snowflake'.

 

[easyt65]

DISCUSSION AT THE NYT BEFORE THEY RAN THE FAKE NEWS STORY:
"Hillary said it so it must be true'.
"Who cares if it is true, it's an attack on Trump. Print it!"

 

[Theowl32]

Like there is no discernable difference between Islamic terrorist groups, there is no difference in the left wing media.

Just like the different terror groups have the exact same goals and ideology, the different left wing media groups share in the same ideology.

Many people would be horrified if war was declared on the left in this country. Not me.

 

[kiwiman127]

The Media Perpetuated A Clinton Lie For 9 Months. What It Means For The Russia Narrative

"When Hillary Clinton claimed “17 intelligence agencies” agree on Russian meddling in the third presidential debate, a host of media outlets including The New York Times rated the claim as 100 percent true. Nine months later, those same outlets say the stat is obviously false, and there’s been a “simple” explanation as to why all along.

A closer look at how the claim survived and thrived over those nine months reveals a startling lack of skepticism in the press when it comes to the Russia narrative. The truth is the great majority of the 17 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community had nothing to do with the investigation and made no judgments about the matter."



"...its star political reporter recently reiterated the false claim as she was in the middle of writing an article characterizing President Trump as stubbornly foolish."
-- "Her story was later corrected..."


EVERY ATTEMPT TO CLAIM 'Trump-Russia' Collusion has been DEBUNKED, DIS-CREDITED, Proven FALSE!

No Crime.
No Criminal Activity.
No Collusion.
No Evidence.
No Credibility.
No Case.

Here we go again! Easy using a bullshit resource! But the irony is, he's calling out a media resource using another resource who doesn't exactly have a spotless reputation for providing the truth.
Way to go Easy!
daily caller Archives | Snopes.com

 

[easyt65]

Here we go again! Easy using a bullshit resource! But the irony is, he's calling out a media resource using another resource who doesn't exactly have a spotless reputation for providing the truth.
Way to go Easy!
daily caller Archives | Snopes.com

One problem with your criticism of my post....you forget the NYT ADMITTED they had printed Fake News by offering a correction (as mentioned in the article and which they actually DID do)....just as CNN ADMITTED they had reported Fake News by offering a correction and firing 4 reporters.....proving what I posted is TRUE.

Nice try, snowflake.

 

[miketx]

The Media Perpetuated A Clinton Lie For 9 Months. What It Means For The Russia Narrative

"When Hillary Clinton claimed “17 intelligence agencies” agree on Russian meddling in the third presidential debate, a host of media outlets including The New York Times rated the claim as 100 percent true. Nine months later, those same outlets say the stat is obviously false, and there’s been a “simple” explanation as to why all along.

A closer look at how the claim survived and thrived over those nine months reveals a startling lack of skepticism in the press when it comes to the Russia narrative. The truth is the great majority of the 17 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community had nothing to do with the investigation and made no judgments about the matter."



"...its star political reporter recently reiterated the false claim as she was in the middle of writing an article characterizing President Trump as stubbornly foolish."
-- "Her story was later corrected..."


EVERY ATTEMPT TO CLAIM 'Trump-Russia' Collusion has been DEBUNKED, DIS-CREDITED, Proven FALSE!

No Crime.
No Criminal Activity.
No Collusion.
No Evidence.
No Credibility.
No Case.

Here we go again! Easy using a bullshit resource! But the irony is, he's calling out a media resource using another resource who doesn't exactly have a spotless reputation for providing the truth.
Way to go Easy!
daily caller Archives | Snopes.com

And here we keep the lib circle alive by referencing snopes, a known lib rag.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The OP is making the argument that Trump's word is worthless and doesn't even know he's doing it.

 

[miketx]

The OP is making the argument that Trump's word is worthless and doesn't even know he's doing it.

 

[brummelben]

The Media Perpetuated A Clinton Lie For 9 Months. What It Means For The Russia Narrative

"When Hillary Clinton claimed “17 intelligence agencies” agree on Russian meddling in the third presidential debate, a host of media outlets including The New York Times rated the claim as 100 percent true. Nine months later, those same outlets say the stat is obviously false, and there’s been a “simple” explanation as to why all along.

A closer look at how the claim survived and thrived over those nine months reveals a startling lack of skepticism in the press when it comes to the Russia narrative. The truth is the great majority of the 17 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community had nothing to do with the investigation and made no judgments about the matter."



"...its star political reporter recently reiterated the false claim as she was in the middle of writing an article characterizing President Trump as stubbornly foolish."
-- "Her story was later corrected..."


EVERY ATTEMPT TO CLAIM 'Trump-Russia' Collusion has been DEBUNKED, DIS-CREDITED, Proven FALSE!

No Crime.
No Criminal Activity.
No Collusion.
No Evidence.
No Credibility.
No Case.

Are you phyucking nuts? tell that to the special prosecutor!

 

[easyt65]

Are you phyucking nuts? tell that to the special prosecutor!

...who has found / presented

No crime
No criminal activity
No Collusion
No Obstruction
No evidence
No case.