martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 102,578
- 53,409
- 2,615
How do they “support” them?
Logistics, safe base for operations, security of said base.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do they “support” them?
Being dressed in “assault attire” is also legal. Hell, they could even be carrying AR-15s legally. Of course, that’s how right wingers choose to protest super dangerous drag shows.Show me planned parenthood protesters dressed in assault attire and actually trying to attack federal agents.
That comparison is weak, even for a half wit like you.
How do they keep them “safe”? Their compound is already surrounded by a wall.Logistics, safe base for operations, security of said base.
Being dressed in “assault attire” is also legal. Hell, they could even be carrying AR-15s legally. Of course, that’s how right wingers choose to protest super dangerous drag shows.
There were only a handful of instances of anyone attacking federal agents. Four in the last month. It wasn’t anything they couldn’t handle with regular police.
How do they keep them “safe”? Their compound is already surrounded by a wall.
If it were way more than that, you’d have thought they’d have told the judge who heard the case.Not when you show up with the express intent on interfering with law enforcement doing their legal jobs.
Way more than that, but of course you lie about it.
The regular police in blue cities refuse to aid federal officers.
So far even anti-fa isn't stupid enough to go against a platoon of riflemen.
If it were way more than that, you’d have thought they’d have told the judge who heard the case.
Of course, you can lie all you want on TV, but not before a judge.
Posse comitatus is still law.
What would happen if they did?
Seems that DHS is very interested in arresting protestors. And prosecuting them.LOL, the federal officers are more concerned with doing their job, not arresting anti-fa idiots. Far more would have been arrested if the local police weren't in alliance with them.
That judge is an unconstitutional hack, and will be overturned quickly.
Seems that DHS is very interested in arresting protestors. And prosecuting them.
Like the guy who threw a sandwich.
Are you saying you know more about the protests than the judge hearing the case?
What would happen?FAFO
What would happen?
A handful of people did anything remotely violent. Nothing that the police couldn’t handle.Rioters and assaulters of federal officers, not protesters.
I'm saying the judge had their mind made up before the case, that's why the plaintiffs picked that judge.
Is that legal? You didn’t think so when it was Babbitt.Your anti-fa goons would get some martyrs and you would call Trump a murderer.
A handful of people did anything remotely violent. Nothing that the police couldn’t handle.
They didn’t “pick” a judge. They’re a Trump appointee anyway. Your accusation is baseless. Another example of your disconnect with reality, you just say and believe anything you want.
Is that legal? You didn’t think so when it was Babbitt.
DHS are police, silly.The police were told to do nothing by the local government.
LOL, they sure as hell did pick one, and it was a first term appointed RINO. We learned that lesson.