It's the law of attraction, I notice that in all most all your relationships that you have posted on the board. You like being the poor victim. Anyone with a brain can see that, unfortunately, I don't think you have one.
Well, you certainly don't have a brain... you just have a fixation... that you are interested in my "relationships". That's kind of you know, queer.
Moving on to someone who has a point to make.
I also happen to be familiar with the case law that has occurred in the past 150 years, particularly the recent case law legalizing so called same sex marriage as well as the balancing tests now used in religious liberty cases. And I know they completely undermine the reasoning given that allowed the federal government to outlaw polygamy back in 1890s. I also know that polygamist are trying to overturn those laws. It's a matter of time. Especially as public opinion polls say people oppose polygamy less.
I don't have a problem with the polygamy laws being overturned. If a guy wants to put up with two women rearranging his medicine cabinet, that's on him.
That said, my problem with the Mormons in this context is that claim their leader talks to God directly. And oddly, God always seems to do what is politically expedient.
So if tomorrow, the Federal government decides that churches that preach homophobia are no longer entitled to a 501C(1) tax exemption, just like churches that preach racism aren't, you can bet that Monson and God will have a talk and Monson will let us all know that God is totally good with the gay now.
Just like Woodruff said he was good with ending polygamy and Kimball said God was good with letting black folks join the ministry.
and this is my problem with religion- well, one of them, anyway - is that they don't stand for principles, they change them as it becomes expedient to do so,and they don't end barbaric or stupid practices because someone got up one day and said it was wrong, but because there is a money motive.
The Catholic Church knew they had all sorts of pedophiles in their ministry. They didn't start doing something about it until these kids turned around and sued and it started costing them money. But it never occurs to them to change the underlying policy of excluding healthy heterosexual men by demanding celibacy.