Penelope
Diamond Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 60,265
- 15,804
- 2,210
So, being somewhere else means nothing in this context and worse is your ignorance in bringing up things like speaches which high fees are used to mask & funnel pay to play money. Favors=high speaking fees or rediculous book deals whereby payment is unsuspecting except when they make it obvious.They are freaking out, over the thought ofHillary and Bill have some serious ties to Russia.
New York Times:
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
“And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”
Come on, libs....where is your freak out about this?
sending the man to Russia who helped funnel
the money in order to stand trial in Russia.
A Russian jew, you don't say, if Putin says so it has to be true. Also Clinton was making speeches all over the globe.
Like in the case of both Obamas book deals which way exceding his and hers books ability to earn that
payout, making it tooooooo obvious.
I bet Trump made that his first year of being Potus, more than that, and his daughter made 82 million last year. Lol.
I
n 2014, before Clinton Cash was in the public eye, the Washington Post analyzed Clinton’s speaking fees and found he made at least $104 million in speaking fees between 2001 through 2012 -- more than half of that income came from speeches in foreign countries (though he gave more speeches within the United States).
Fact-checking 'Clinton Cash' author on claim about Bill Clinton's speaking fees