More Background on Judge James Boasberg – The Fight Continues

DonGlock26

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
7,088
Reaction score
11,298
Points
2,118
"More Background on Judge James Boasberg – The Fight Continues


March 19, 2025 | Sundance |

When you understand how Washington DC Judges view their role and responsibility, then you understand the scale of opposition that President Trump is facing. The false media framework of our “government” only makes the issues worse. So, here’s an explanation of Boasberg v Trump.



In 2016 the DOJ-NSD headed by Mary McCord filed a FISA application seeking a Title-1 search (full and unlimited) surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The method to gain the surveillance authority was to use CIA informant Carter Page who had met with the Trump campaign and call Page an “agent of a foreign power.”

The FISA Court knowingly and with specific intent approved the Title-1 surveillance warrant which was filed using false evidence (Clinesmith) and sketchy supporting documents (Steele Dossier), no Woods File was attached.

At the time of the application, Mary McCord was acting head of the DOJ National Security Division. McCord was responsible for filing the warrant application. The DOJ-NSD had no inspector general oversight. The targeting of candidate Donald Trump was entirely for political purposes and intents."




This judge has a long record of aiding the corrupt Obama and Biden admin's persecution of Trump. It's time to get this all out into the open.
The above article does a good job of explaining the weaponization of the FBI, DOJ, and FISA courts.
 
This is a garbage fact-free article from conservative tree house.
 
"More Background on Judge James Boasberg – The Fight Continues


March 19, 2025 | Sundance |

When you understand how Washington DC Judges view their role and responsibility, then you understand the scale of opposition that President Trump is facing. The false media framework of our “government” only makes the issues worse. So, here’s an explanation of Boasberg v Trump.



In 2016 the DOJ-NSD headed by Mary McCord filed a FISA application seeking a Title-1 search (full and unlimited) surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The method to gain the surveillance authority was to use CIA informant Carter Page who had met with the Trump campaign and call Page an “agent of a foreign power.”

The FISA Court knowingly and with specific intent approved the Title-1 surveillance warrant which was filed using false evidence (Clinesmith) and sketchy supporting documents (Steele Dossier), no Woods File was attached.

At the time of the application, Mary McCord was acting head of the DOJ National Security Division. McCord was responsible for filing the warrant application. The DOJ-NSD had no inspector general oversight. The targeting of candidate Donald Trump was entirely for political purposes and intents."




This judge has a long record of aiding the corrupt Obama and Biden admin's persecution of Trump. It's time to get this all out into the open.
The above article does a good job of explaining the weaponization of the FBI, DOJ, and FISA courts.
Hey. All you need is 72 votes in the Senate, and you're all set.


:th_beback:
 
Obama makes Nixon look like a cub scout.

obamaisacrookgfngng.webp
obamanixionjfhhdjh.webp
obamaiswosethannixongfhgfhfhf.webp
obamaisacrookjhgjhjfffhf.webp
obamagatedhckch.webp
 
Hey. All you need is 72 votes in the Senate, and you're all set.


:th_beback:

There's that 72 number again.
Do Democrats get 72 transgender women, if they die burning a Tesla dealership?
 
Obama had a warrant.

And Trump has not for what he has been pulling.

That will in the news fairly soon.
 
"More Background on Judge James Boasberg – The Fight Continues

Think of it---

These appointed district judges are usurping more power than the Supreme Court. Even the Supreme Court is a bench of nine justices with no single judge having say over the entire court, yet these appointed district judges are single-handedly overruling an elected president and the will of 77 million Americans, something even the Supreme Court cannot do as a co-equal branch, therefore, unless overruled, the President now serves at the pleasure of these district judges.

The President cannot do a thing unless it passes muster with all 677 federal judges in all 94 district courts first.
 
Think of it---

These appointed district judges are usurping more power than the Supreme Court. Even the Supreme Court is a bench of nine justices with no single judge having say over the entire court, yet these appointed district judges are single-handedly overruling an elected president and the will of 77 million Americans, something even the Supreme Court cannot do as a co-equal branch, therefore, unless overruled, the President now serves at the pleasure of these district judges.

The President cannot do a thing unless it passes muster with all 677 federal judges in all 94 district courts first.

Meanwhile, Chief Justice Roberts is whining about possible impeachments in the legislative branch.
 
"More Background on Judge James Boasberg – The Fight Continues


March 19, 2025 | Sundance |

When you understand how Washington DC Judges view their role and responsibility, then you understand the scale of opposition that President Trump is facing. The false media framework of our “government” only makes the issues worse. So, here’s an explanation of Boasberg v Trump.



In 2016 the DOJ-NSD headed by Mary McCord filed a FISA application seeking a Title-1 search (full and unlimited) surveillance warrant against the leading presidential candidate, Donald Trump. The method to gain the surveillance authority was to use CIA informant Carter Page who had met with the Trump campaign and call Page an “agent of a foreign power.”

The FISA Court knowingly and with specific intent approved the Title-1 surveillance warrant which was filed using false evidence (Clinesmith) and sketchy supporting documents (Steele Dossier), no Woods File was attached.

At the time of the application, Mary McCord was acting head of the DOJ National Security Division. McCord was responsible for filing the warrant application. The DOJ-NSD had no inspector general oversight. The targeting of candidate Donald Trump was entirely for political purposes and intents."




This judge has a long record of aiding the corrupt Obama and Biden admin's persecution of Trump. It's time to get this all out into the open.
The above article does a good job of explaining the weaponization of the FBI, DOJ, and FISA courts.
/-----/ Even more lawfare.
 
Back
Top Bottom