Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I almost can't even believe what Hawley is saying here..
But he is a reliable sort..
What is it with the dimrats? What do they have against children?
Sick doesn't begin to say it...
but where is the democrats and their dancing queers showIf they are old enough to rob a 711 they are old enough to work.
Children were working long before we decided to diefy them. Democrats think children are old enough to prostitute. They can work.
I almost can't even believe what Hawley is saying here..
But he is a reliable sort..
What is it with the dimrats? What do they have against children?
Sick doesn't begin to say it...
Here is the whole story incase you’re interested, which I doubt
It’s true, as a New York Times investigation found, that underage teenagers are working long, brutal shifts in factories and other businesses in violation of child labor laws. When your kid eats Lucky Charms for breakfast or a Nature Valley granola bar for school snack, they might have been packaged by kids of roughly the same age.
What’s more, many of those kids are migrants from Central America. Those who arrive unaccompanied are placed with a sponsor by the Department of Health and Human Services. And yes, soaring arrivals have compelled HHS to move them to sponsors quickly — sometimes too quickly, caseworkers say.
But here the right’s argument veers into deception. For instance, Hawley’s claim that HHS doesn’t care that nearly 90,000 kids have been “lost” to “slavery” is wildly absurd.
Here’s the deal: HHS does a follow-up call to sponsors to check on kids, and in the past two years, 85,000 such calls went unanswered. But an HHS spokesperson says sponsors and kids are not required to answer checkup calls; we only know sponsors didn’t pick up the phone, nothing more. (Hundreds of thousands of minors have crossed the border, and HHS says 81 percent of follow-ups are answered, so unanswered calls are not representative of the situation.)
Nor is there any basis to conclude that those unreached kids correlate with those who end up in exploitative situations. There is plenty of grounds to worry about those kids, but Hawley’s claims are unhinged speculation.