Minutes after Trump shooting, misinformation started flying. Here are the facts

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
17,716
Reaction score
10,749
Points
1,280
Location
Twin Falls Idaho
Spinning...spinning....spinning.....
From the very first moment


Within minutes of the gunfire, the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump spawned a vast sea of claims — some outlandish, others contradictory — reflecting the frightening uncertainties of the moment as well as America’s fevered, polarized political climate.

“We saw things like ‘The Chinese were behind it,’ or ‘ Antifa was behind it,’ or ‘the Biden administration did it.’ We also saw a claim that the RNC was behind it,’” said Paul Bartel, senior intelligence analyst at PeakMetrics. “Everyone is just speculating. No one really knows what’s going on. They go online to try to figure it out.”

Videos of the shooting were quickly dissected in partisan echo chambers and Trump supporters and detractors looked for evidence to support their beliefs. Videos showing Secret Service agents moving audience members away from Trump before the shooting were offered as evidence that it was an inside job. Images of Trump’s defiantly raised fist were used to make the opposite claim — that the whole event was staged by Trump.

“How did the USSS allow him to stop and pose for a photo opp if there was real danger??” wrote one user, using the abbreviation for the U.S. Secret Service.

Social media bots helped amplify the false claims on platforms including Facebook, Instagram, X and TikTok, according to an analysis by the Israeli tech firm Cyabra, which found that a full 45% of the accounts using hashtags like #fakeassassination and #stagedshooting were inauthentic.

An image created using artificial intelligence — depicting a smiling Trump moments after the shooting — was also making the rounds, Cyabra found.

Conspiracy theories quickly emerged online that misidentified the suspected shooter, blamed other people without evidence and espoused hate speech, including virulent antisemitism.

“Moments like this are cannon fodder for extremists online, because typically they will react with great confidence to whatever has happened without any real evidence” said Jacob Ware, a research fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. “People will fall into spirals and will advance their own ideologies and their own conclusions.”

Before authorities identified the suspect, photos of two different people circulated widely online falsely identifying them as the shooter.

In all the speculation and conjecture, others were trying to exploit the event financially. On X on Sunday morning, an account named Proud Patriots urged Trump supporters to purchase their assassination-attempt themed merchandise.

“First they jail him, now they try to end him,” reads the ad for the commemorative Trump Assassination Attempt Trading Card. “Stand Strong & Show Your Support!”
 
.... ‘The Chinese were behind it,’ or ‘ Antifa was behind it,’ or ‘the Biden administration did it.’ We also saw a claim that the RNC was behind it,’” said Paul Bartel, senior intelligence analyst at PeakMetrics.
Frustration was behind it.
 
Spinning...spinning....spinning.....
From the very first moment


Within minutes of the gunfire, the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump spawned a vast sea of claims — some outlandish, others contradictory — reflecting the frightening uncertainties of the moment as well as America’s fevered, polarized political climate.

“We saw things like ‘The Chinese were behind it,’ or ‘ Antifa was behind it,’ or ‘the Biden administration did it.’ We also saw a claim that the RNC was behind it,’” said Paul Bartel, senior intelligence analyst at PeakMetrics. “Everyone is just speculating. No one really knows what’s going on. They go online to try to figure it out.”

Videos of the shooting were quickly dissected in partisan echo chambers and Trump supporters and detractors looked for evidence to support their beliefs. Videos showing Secret Service agents moving audience members away from Trump before the shooting were offered as evidence that it was an inside job. Images of Trump’s defiantly raised fist were used to make the opposite claim — that the whole event was staged by Trump.

“How did the USSS allow him to stop and pose for a photo opp if there was real danger??” wrote one user, using the abbreviation for the U.S. Secret Service.

Social media bots helped amplify the false claims on platforms including Facebook, Instagram, X and TikTok, according to an analysis by the Israeli tech firm Cyabra, which found that a full 45% of the accounts using hashtags like #fakeassassination and #stagedshooting were inauthentic.

An image created using artificial intelligence — depicting a smiling Trump moments after the shooting — was also making the rounds, Cyabra found.

Conspiracy theories quickly emerged online that misidentified the suspected shooter, blamed other people without evidence and espoused hate speech, including virulent antisemitism.

“Moments like this are cannon fodder for extremists online, because typically they will react with great confidence to whatever has happened without any real evidence” said Jacob Ware, a research fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. “People will fall into spirals and will advance their own ideologies and their own conclusions.”

Before authorities identified the suspect, photos of two different people circulated widely online falsely identifying them as the shooter.

In all the speculation and conjecture, others were trying to exploit the event financially. On X on Sunday morning, an account named Proud Patriots urged Trump supporters to purchase their assassination-attempt themed merchandise.


“First they jail him, now they try to end him,” reads the ad for the commemorative Trump Assassination Attempt Trading Card. “Stand Strong & Show Your Support!”
The biden administration came within 1 inch of getting trump killed

Of course we have questions that Homeland Security would rather not answer
 
Are you asking me a straight-forward question or are you asking me to defend a theory that I haven't yet stated?
I'm asking a rhetorical question. I know that you don't know the answer. I'm just giving an example of what more we need to know.
 
Yep. Almost all of that was repeated on this site. I personally saw:

  • It was the Chinese
  • It was Antifa
  • It was a Biden order
  • It was an inside job
  • It was a false flag
  • It wasnt Crooks it was some other guy people claimed was Antifa
  • There were 2 shooters
  • Crooks was a patsy
  • Crooks was controlled by Blackrock
  • It was DEI
 
Yep. Almost all of that was repeated on this site. I personally saw:

  • It was the Chinese
  • It was Antifa
  • It was a Biden order
  • It was an inside job
  • It was a false flag
  • It wasnt Crooks it was some other guy people claimed was Antifa
  • There were 2 shooters
  • Crooks was a patsy
  • Crooks was controlled by Blackrock
  • It was DEI
nice list
 
I'm asking a rhetorical question. I know that you don't know the answer. I'm just giving an example of what more we need to know.
Yeah, sure, of course. I guess I'm saying that those who automatically call people conspiracy theorists need to accept the fact that those agents "looking the other way" for 24 minutes (while civilians tried to warn them) almost had to have been instructed to do so. The glitch here is ..... am I now talking with one of those who are willing to call me a conspiracy theorist?
 
Yeah, sure, of course. I guess I'm saying that those who automatically call people conspiracy theorists need to accept the fact that those agents "looking the other way" for 24 minutes (while civilians tried to warn them) almost had to have been instructed to do so. The glitch here is ..... am I now talking with one of those who are willing to call me a conspiracy theorist?
I have no idea if you're a conspiracy theorist. I certainly am. It's hard not to see conspiracies when they're so damned obvious.
 
Back
Top Bottom