Intelligent people know there is a God. Dumbass people think THEY are god.
`
`
In this context here means "agnostic" "atheist". The problem in this context: Atheism as well as monotheism are a belief. Agnosticism is the philosophy which finds out that atheism is a belief and monotheism is not a natural science. So a real agnostics is able to be an agnostics, who believes in god (or spirituality), or an agnostics, who believes in atheism (or aspirituality).
Today exist the problem that the most people misunderstand the real scientific theory of evolution with very confused ideas about many forms of Darwinisms. I could write now very long about all this mistakes. For example is the natural law "evolution" without any intention - it's causal (all natural laws are causal (although in elementary physics it could be causes are also able to come out of the future)) and not teleological (all human intentions are teleological, are plans). That's why for example nothing what human beings are doing is "evolution" - with other words:
Progress is not evolution! Example: Machines are made under teleological intentions (plans and projects). Machines follow just simple our collective growing knowledge and our fashions.
And another mistake of the people, who know not a lot about evolution, but use this as an argument for everything and nothing, is for example that they don't understand the concept "random" very well. Not random creates forms - forms are part of the reality all around - in the theory of evolution forms are called "ecological niche" for example. If someone hammers a plate of metal into a special form it is nearly totally unimportant to smash a hammer randomly down on the plate or non-randomly down on the plate. How to do it is more a kind of arts. What's under the plate will appear as a pattern on the surface of the plate. ... and so on and so on and so on ... Unfortunatelly dominates social darwinism - let me call this the "church of atheism" - more and more the daily life of all people worldwide.
Back to the wrong use of the word "agnosticism" today in the epistemology of the science of the English speaking world. The word agnosticism in natural science means there, that the "god-hypothese" is not able to solve problems of natural sciene. The real problems in this context: (1) Christians don't say so. (2) Natural science follows the philosophy "empirism". But empirism is not god and no one is 7 days a week 24 hours a day an empiricist. Whoever really tried to find out, what is going on in the world, knows very well how damned diffcult it is to find the Higgs particle. Progress needs often many people with a very big patience for a very long time.
To say "someone is able to make experiences (=to find knowledge) without to think about god in this moment" is indeed nothing what's anyone in the world is really surprising. Jesus was a carpenter and he had all fingers, when he was crucified. This doesn't mean everyone has always not to believe in god. God helps also the blind chickens to find a corn of truth, if they are looking for. Oh by the way: Am I on the other side of the road now?The side where truth still exists?
So: 94% of all biologists in the USA are atheists today. And I heard in my country Germany 97% of all journalists are atheists too. And soon AI's will overtake their jobs
if this is the will of amazon or google or ...
Oh by the way: I'm quite sure real artifical intelligence is only a kind of problem of the spirit which is comparable to the problem "perpeptuum mobile" in physics. So don't worry, whoever you are. God takes care - while atheists try to become the big brother who is watching themselves and find out that they are right on their own while the worlds are not real and truth is not exsiting.
.
