Michael Flynn Loses Appeal. Full Court Rejects Dismissal Recommendation By AG Bill Barr

[skews13]

CNBC has this story up here that the DC Court of Appeals rejected the request by Michael Flynn to enforce the Dept of (In)Justice’s request, planted by Donnie Deathcount henchling AG Barr, for dismissal of his case. The vote was 8-2.

If you recollect, Justice Sullivan appointed a special master to review the case for dismissal and invited third parties to respond to the request. Justice Sullivan denied the request for dismissal. Flynn appealed to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. In a 2-1 decision (led by Trump appointee Naomi Rao), a panel determined Sullivan would have to follow the DoJ request and dismiss the case. Sullivan appealed to the full Court.

Today’s ruling smacks down the Trump appointee (any surprise there?) and:

In an 8-2 ruling, the appeals court judges indicated that Flynn’s request was premature, since U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan of Washington had not yet even ruled on the dismissal request by the Justice Department.

The Court also dismissed Flynn’s request that Judge Sullivan be removed from the case. That was also denied. The case goes back to Judge Sullivan for ruling and potential Flynn sentencing.

Former Trump advisor Michael Flynn loses appeal seeking quick dismissal of criminal case

Flynn, President Trump's first national security advisor, had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his talks with a Russian diplomat.

www.cnbc.com

 

[theHawk]

LOL, the Deep State just can’t acknowledge reality.

“Flynn’s request was premature” is the reason they denied it. Hmm, okay we’ll do it later then, even though the state already dropped the case and admitted to wrongdoing on their part.

 

[task0778]

So, for the first time in American history that I know of, a judge is going to prosecute a case without a prosecutor, thereby trampling all over the Separation of Powers that our Constitution requires. We are officially no longer a nation of laws, we are a nation of men who can ignore the law for political purposes. Sullivan is going to do whatever he wants, but if he does not rule in Flynn's favor then this whole bullshit case will end up in the Supreme court, where it will be dismissed.

 

[blackhawk]

Supreme Court here we come.

 

[theHawk]

So, for the first time in American history that I know of, a judge is going to prosecute a case without a prosecutor, thereby trampling all over the Separation of Powers that our Constitution requires. We are officially no longer a nation of laws, we are a nation of men who can ignore the law for political purposes. Sullivan is going to do whatever he wants, but if he does not rule in Flynn's favor then this whole bullshit case will end up in the Supreme court, where it will be dismissed.

Don’t you know, this is “social justice”. He supported President Trump, so he must be punished.

 

[Penelope]

LOL, the Deep State just can’t acknowledge reality.

“Flynn’s request was premature” is the reason they denied it. Hmm, okay we’ll do it later then, even though the state already dropped the case and admitted to wrongdoing on their part.

He lied and he should pay the penalty, life in prison.

 

[Penelope]

So, for the first time in American history that I know of, a judge is going to prosecute a case without a prosecutor, thereby trampling all over the Separation of Powers that our Constitution requires. We are officially no longer a nation of laws, we are a nation of men who can ignore the law for political purposes. Sullivan is going to do whatever he wants, but if he does not rule in Flynn's favor then this whole bullshit case will end up in the Supreme court, where it will be dismissed.

Don’t you know, this is “social justice”. He supported President Trump, so he must be punished.

You have it all wrong, He lied because he supported tramp.

 

[Oddball]

Shocking that the judicial oligarchs would circle the wagons and carry the water for one of their own...

Not.

 

[AZrailwhale]

CNBC has this story up here that the DC Court of Appeals rejected the request by Michael Flynn to enforce the Dept of (In)Justice’s request, planted by Donnie Deathcount henchling AG Barr, for dismissal of his case. The vote was 8-2.

If you recollect, Justice Sullivan appointed a special master to review the case for dismissal and invited third parties to respond to the request. Justice Sullivan denied the request for dismissal. Flynn appealed to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. In a 2-1 decision (led by Trump appointee Naomi Rao), a panel determined Sullivan would have to follow the DoJ request and dismiss the case. Sullivan appealed to the full Court.

Today’s ruling smacks down the Trump appointee (any surprise there?) and:

In an 8-2 ruling, the appeals court judges indicated that Flynn’s request was premature, since U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan of Washington had not yet even ruled on the dismissal request by the Justice Department.

The Court also dismissed Flynn’s request that Judge Sullivan be removed from the case. That was also denied. The case goes back to Judge Sullivan for ruling and potential Flynn sentencing.

Former Trump advisor Michael Flynn loses appeal seeking quick dismissal of criminal case

Flynn, President Trump's first national security advisor, had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his talks with a Russian diplomat.

www.cnbc.com

Flynn didn't lose the appeal, the court simply ruled that he filed it too soon. Geeze, get the simple things right if you are going to start a thread./

 

[skews13]

So, for the first time in American history that I know of, a judge is going to prosecute a case without a prosecutor, thereby trampling all over the Separation of Powers that our Constitution requires. We are officially no longer a nation of laws, we are a nation of men who can ignore the law for political purposes. Sullivan is going to do whatever he wants, but if he does not rule in Flynn's favor then this whole bullshit case will end up in the Supreme court, where it will be dismissed.

Wrong. The case has already been adjudicated. The guilty plea was entered. Sentencing now can proceed.

 

[John T. Ford]

Don’t you know, this is “social justice”. He supported President Trump, so he must be punished.

It is well known the B. Hussein had a personal vendetta against Michael Flynn.

 

[meaner gene]

So, for the first time in American history that I know of, a judge is going to prosecute a case without a prosecutor, thereby trampling all over the Separation of Powers that our Constitution requires. We are officially no longer a nation of laws, we are a nation of men who can ignore the law for political purposes. Sullivan is going to do whatever he wants, but if he does not rule in Flynn's favor then this whole bullshit case will end up in the Supreme court, where it will be dismissed.

Just the opposite. We are an "adversarial" system. Unless there are two sides presented, there is no fair way to judge. Every case needs a devils advocate.

 

[RodISHI]

So, for the first time in American history that I know of, a judge is going to prosecute a case without a prosecutor, thereby trampling all over the Separation of Powers that our Constitution requires. We are officially no longer a nation of laws, we are a nation of men who can ignore the law for political purposes. Sullivan is going to do whatever he wants, but if he does not rule in Flynn's favor then this whole bullshit case will end up in the Supreme court, where it will be dismissed.

Don’t you know, this is “social justice”. He supported President Trump, so he must be punished.

Civility isn't in the nature of those who are now totally desperate.

 

[DGS49]

Where are the outcries from all the Trump haters who believe that non-violent offenders should not be incarcerated?

[The sound of crickets chirping]

 

[meaner gene]

Where are the outcries from all the Trump haters who believe that non-violent offenders should not be incarcerated?

[The sound of crickets chirping]

Are you a friend of Bernie Madoff?

 

[theHawk]

LOL, the Deep State just can’t acknowledge reality.

“Flynn’s request was premature” is the reason they denied it. Hmm, okay we’ll do it later then, even though the state already dropped the case and admitted to wrongdoing on their part.

He lied and he should pay the penalty, life in prison.

He lied about what exactly? Do you even know?

Funny you don’t feel the same about Hillary lying and destroying evidence with her email law breaking.

 

[Oddball]

So, for the first time in American history that I know of, a judge is going to prosecute a case without a prosecutor, thereby trampling all over the Separation of Powers that our Constitution requires. We are officially no longer a nation of laws, we are a nation of men who can ignore the law for political purposes. Sullivan is going to do whatever he wants, but if he does not rule in Flynn's favor then this whole bullshit case will end up in the Supreme court, where it will be dismissed.

Wrong. The case has already been adjudicated. The guilty plea was entered. Sentencing now can proceed.

The plea was withdrawn because of bad faith on the part of the prosecution, which abandoned the case....There is now nothing to be adjudicated, hackasaurus rex.

 

[beautress]

CNBC has this story up here that the DC Court of Appeals rejected the request by Michael Flynn to enforce the Dept of (In)Justice’s request, planted by Donnie Deathcount henchling AG Barr, for dismissal of his case. The vote was 8-2.

If you recollect, Justice Sullivan appointed a special master to review the case for dismissal and invited third parties to respond to the request. Justice Sullivan denied the request for dismissal. Flynn appealed to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. In a 2-1 decision (led by Trump appointee Naomi Rao), a panel determined Sullivan would have to follow the DoJ request and dismiss the case. Sullivan appealed to the full Court.

Today’s ruling smacks down the Trump appointee (any surprise there?) and:

In an 8-2 ruling, the appeals court judges indicated that Flynn’s request was premature, since U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan of Washington had not yet even ruled on the dismissal request by the Justice Department.

The Court also dismissed Flynn’s request that Judge Sullivan be removed from the case. That was also denied. The case goes back to Judge Sullivan for ruling and potential Flynn sentencing.

Former Trump advisor Michael Flynn loses appeal seeking quick dismissal of criminal case

Flynn, President Trump's first national security advisor, had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his talks with a Russian diplomat.

www.cnbc.com

This sounds like a group conspiracy to force President Trump to pardon Flynn so they can use the pardon to show presidential partiality to the base, plus destroy Republican with mail invotes they can control their way into unearned House and Senate seats. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see lust for control in the democrat brass as well as ranks.

 

[meaner gene]

He lied and he should pay the penalty, life in prison.

He lied about what exactly? Do you even know?

Funny you don’t feel the same about Hillary lying and destroying evidence with her email law breaking.

Read the Senate Intelligence report, book 5, that explains exactly what Flynn lied about.

Hint:

On December 29, 2016, after speaking with McFarland, Flynn called Kislyak and discussed multiple issues, including the sanctions. As to sanctions, Flynn asked that Russia no( escalate the situation, and to instead respond in a reciprocal
manner in order to avoid a "tit for tat.

She later briefed Trump, along with multiple senior Transition Team officials, including Bannon, Priebus, and Sean Spicer

During the meeting, Trump asked whether Russia interfered with the 2016 election, and McFarland said that it had
Pg: 784

 

[meaner gene]

The plea was withdrawn because of bad faith on the part of the prosecution, which abandoned the case....There is now nothing to be adjudicated, hackasaurus rex.

This is no difference than when the 21st amendment repealed the 18th amendment (prohibition). The government abandoned prosecution of people charged with violating the Volstead act.

But, even so, those who had been previously found guilty, remained guilty.