Media back to 100% negative coverage once again

justoffal

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2013
Messages
33,553
Reaction score
26,276
Points
2,905
This is what got them in trouble in the first place.
There's no such thing as real 100%. Negative coverage....any time you see it you know that it is contrived.

Having said that it also means that some of it is false. Now I'm not at all comfortable with government control of the media....but this type of monopolistic smear waving is probably walking on the edge of libel.

Yet it's back.... Somewhere between 99 and 100% negative. Day and day out.... 24/7.... The war is back on.
 
This is what got them in trouble in the first place.
There's no such thing as real 100%. Negative coverage....any time you see it you know that it is contrived.

Having said that it also means that some of it is false. Now I'm not at all comfortable with government control of the media....but this type of monopolistic smear waving is probably walking on the edge of libel.

Yet it's back.... Somewhere between 99 and 100% negative. Day and day out.... 24/7.... The war is back on.
What are you talking about? Negative aspects of trump proposed office nominees? Proposals of doing away with Medicare, polio vaccines, etc ? What parts should have been shielded from public consideration?
 
This is what got them in trouble in the first place.
There's no such thing as real 100%. Negative coverage....any time you see it you know that it is contrived.

Having said that it also means that some of it is false. Now I'm not at all comfortable with government control of the media....but this type of monopolistic smear waving is probably walking on the edge of libel.

Yet it's back.... Somewhere between 99 and 100% negative. Day and day out.... 24/7.... The war is back on.
People just don't get over a loss. Just accept that Harris lost already.
 
What are you talking about? Negative aspects of trump proposed office nominees? Proposals of doing away with Medicare, polio vaccines, etc ? What parts should have been shielded from public consideration?

Subject matter is one thing... Subject matter buried in negative opinion is another. It's not up to the media to make judgments on those things only to report them.
 
What are you talking about? Negative aspects of trump proposed office nominees? Proposals of doing away with Medicare, polio vaccines, etc ? What parts should have been shielded from public consideration?
Trump isn't planning on doing a way with Medicare.
You Democrats have been repeating that lie since Jimmy Carter was president.
 
This is what got them in trouble in the first place.
There's no such thing as real 100%. Negative coverage....any time you see it you know that it is contrived.

Having said that it also means that some of it is false. Now I'm not at all comfortable with government control of the media....but this type of monopolistic smear waving is probably walking on the edge of libel.

Yet it's back.... Somewhere between 99 and 100% negative. Day and day out.... 24/7.... The war is back on.
Do you think Trump would shake Pete Hegseths hand? He said he hasn't washed his hands in 10 years. LOL

The story is that DeSantis was actually the dooshbags 1st pick and then nobody wanted the guy around so that's where Pete the creep enters the scene. Is that some negative shit or what? Hah Ha Ha!
 
Trump isn't planning on doing a way with Medicare.
You Democrats have been repeating that lie since Jimmy Carter was president.

His visit to France for instance... Could easily have been covered with positivity and goodwill.
He's not even president yet and he is already reaching out to strengthen international ties.
His presence at the rededication of the cathedral with something of a buzz there in Paris.

But what does our media do? Examine every single negative thing they could find about the visit and then magnify it 100 times up to and including the handshake that they decided to find fault with. His being sat next to Jill Biden as if he had anything to do with it.

Right back to the same old game that put X in at the top of the news and sources..
 
Last edited:
Holding Trump accountable is the media's duty,
 
You'd be lying if you had said that.

Obama did more to destroy health care in this country than anyone.

So, we should ignore Republican US Representative Mark Alford of Missouri has been floating out to the public within the last week?
 
So, we should ignore Republican US Representative Mark Alford of Missouri has been floating out to the public within the last week?
Some Missouri jackass says something you don't agree with and you somehow blame what that prick said on Trump?

According to you cucks....everything is Trump's fault.

 
Some Missouri jackass says something you don't agree with and you somehow blame what that prick said on Trump?

According to you cucks....everything is Trump's fault.


I did not mention him in reference to the Missouri House Rep, but it was in reference to DOGE and DOGE is to be a creation of the Trump administration, adding a department to cut down on what is spent by departments, and so efficient, it takes two billionaires to run it.
 
I did not mention him in reference to the Missouri House Rep, but it was in reference to DOGE and DOGE is to be a creation of the Trump administration, adding a department to cut down on what is spent by departments, and so efficient, it takes two billionaires to run it.
DOGE was created by a conservative thinktank that has no affiliation with Trump.

As I said before, you cucks blame everything on the planet on Trump.
 
Back
Top Bottom