Maybe the SCOTUS is about to connect some more dots!

[Chuz Life]

Supreme Court Faces Decision on Case Urging Overturn of Same-Sex Marriage​

Today at nullToday at null; Supreme Court faces decision on case urging overturn of same-sex marriage

"The U.S. Supreme Court is facing a choice about whether to take up a case filed by former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis urging the overturn its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case that guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide."

I hope the SCOTUS takes this case and (just as the SCOTUS did in Dobbs) kicks it back to the individual States to decide for themself what they will and will not recognize as a "marriage."

If it's Constitutional for "personhood" to vary State by State, why not a legal construct like "marriage" too?

 

[rightwinger]

Being married in one state and not when you cross a state line is not workable

What is the courts plan for those who are already married?

 

[Dekster]

Supreme Court Faces Decision on Case Urging Overturn of Same-Sex Marriage​

Today at nullToday at null; Supreme Court faces decision on case urging overturn of same-sex marriage

"The U.S. Supreme Court is facing a choice about whether to take up a case filed by former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis urging the overturn its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case that guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide."

I hope the SCOTUS takes this case and (just as the SCOTUS did in Dobbs) kicks it back to the individual States to decide for themself what they will and will not recognize as a "marriage."

If it['s Constitutional for "personhood" to vary State by State, why not a legal construct like "marriage" too?

I half disagree. I support same sex marriage but agree that the decision nationalizing it was way too shaky and broad. I am okay with states deciding whether or not to conduct them in their state. Where I disagree is that I think every state has to recognize them under full faith and credit the same way states without common law marriage recognizes them from other states as legit.

 

[Chuz Life]

Being married in one state and not when you cross a state line is not workable

What is the courts plan for those who are already married?

You say that as if there wasn't a time before gay marriage was recognized. (where it was workable for more than 100 years.)

And then, what about "personhood" being decided State by State? How is that somehow acceptable? Workable?

 

[0311]

Supreme Court Faces Decision on Case Urging Overturn of Same-Sex Marriage​

Today at nullToday at null; Supreme Court faces decision on case urging overturn of same-sex marriage

"The U.S. Supreme Court is facing a choice about whether to take up a case filed by former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis urging the overturn its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case that guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide."

I hope the SCOTUS takes this case and (just as the SCOTUS did in Dobbs) kicks it back to the individual States to decide for themself what they will and will not recognize as a "marriage."

If it['s Constitutional for "personhood" to vary State by State, why not a legal construct like "marriage" too?

Who the **** are YOU to decide who can and cannot be married. Don't give me "God's Law" shit either. We are a secular nation. You do have any right to decide how other's live their own private lives. It does not matter that brain dead homophobic butt wad full of hate. Which is what you are.

 

[WorldWatcher]

If it's Constitutional for "personhood" to vary State by State, why not a legal construct like "marriage" too?

United States Constitution, Article the 4th:

Civil marriage is an interstate condition as people move between states, for example memebers of the military ordered by the Federal government to be reassigned from San Diego, CA to Norfolk, VA.

Civil Marriage is a public act recognized entered into in one state and recognized by all states.

Abortion is an internal state matter similar to murder. Comite murder in Texas, you are charged and tried in Texas. Comite murder in Texas, you are not tried in Virginia.

WW

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Being married in one state and not when you cross a state line is not workable

What is the courts plan for those who are already married?

Not happening.

 

[0311]

You say that as if there wasn't a time before gay marriage was recognized. (where it was workable for more than 100 years.)

And then, what about "personhood" being decided State by State? How is that somehow acceptable? Workable?

One more time, YOU don't get to decide who can and cannot marry. It is NOT up to you or anyone else. You choose hate. Which is NOT pro-life.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Being married in one state and not when you cross a state line is not workable

What is the courts plan for those who are already married?

If you are married in one state you are married in all states.

 

[citygator]

Nothing like being told you are less than a full person. We should make all gay people sit in the back of the bus if they cant get married. No point in just stopping at marriage. We can get them their own water fountains and bathrooms too. Shouldn’t be welcomed in every restaurant either.

 

[toobfreak]

Supreme Court Faces Decision on Case Urging Overturn of Same-Sex Marriage​

There is no same sex marriage.

Marriage for 10,000 years is the act of holy matrimony before God for the express purpose of keeping the act pure and protecting the sanctity of the institution and the divinity of children.

Homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God, a perversion, a mental or emotional illness requiring treatment, and not just a choice.

But again here I go compromising and agreeing that if gays are to live together and form a partnership, they can at least form a civil union for legal purposes.

But as usual, that was not good enough and the deviant left had to be able to call it a marriage so they could claim there was no difference between fags living together and a man and wife.

 

[Chuz Life]

United States Constitution, Article the 4th:

View attachment 1147993

Civil marriage is an interstate condition as people move between states, for example memebers of the military ordered by the Federal government to be reassigned from San Diego, CA to Norfolk, VA.

Civil Marriage is a public act recognized entered into in one state and recognized by all states.

Abortion is an internal state matter similar to murder. Comite murder in Texas, you are charged and tried in Texas. Comite murder in Texas, you are not tried in Virginia.

WW

So no restrictions on what a marriage is?

Anything goes?

 

[g5000]

There is no same sex marriage.

Marriage for 10,000 years is the act of holy matrimony before God for the express purpose of keeping the act pure and protecting the sanctity of the institution and the divinity of children.

Homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God, a perversion, a mental or emotional illness requiring treatment, and not just a choice.

But again here I go compromising and agreeing that if gays are to live together and form a partnership, they can at least form a civil union for legal purposes.

But as usual, that was not good enough and the deviant left had to be able to call it a marriage so they could claim there was no difference between fags living together and a man and wife.

You are such a hateful person. Seek help.

State sanctioned marriage has nothing to do with the Bible. It has to do with the cash and prizes the State bestows on married couples.

I notice none of you ever whine about the fact Kim Davis has been married four times, which is DEFINITELY not Bible-compliant. Or do you think four marriages protect the sanctity of marriage?!?

Why does a multiple-adulteress get as many marriages as she wants with your consent?

How DO you stand the stench of your sanctimonious hypocrisy?

 

[Chuz Life]

Nothing like being told you are less than a full person. We should make all gay people sit in the back of the bus if they cant get married. No point in just stopping at marriage. We can get them their own water fountains and bathrooms too. Shouldn’t be welcomed in every restaurant either.

 

[g5000]

So no restrictions on what a marriage is?

Wrong.

Anything goes?

Nope.

Marriage is between two consenting adults.

It's not hard to grasp. If you WANT to.

.

 

[Chuz Life]

Who the **** are YOU to decide who can and cannot be married. Don't give me "God's Law" shit either. We are a secular nation. You do have any right to decide how other's live their own private lives. It does not matter that brain dead homophobic butt wad full of hate. Which is what you are.

If I may borrow your vernacular to make the point I was getting to with the OP.

"Who the **** are YOU to decide who can and cannot be married is or is not a human being/ person?. Don't give me "God's Law" "a bunch of leftarded pap" shit either. We are a secular nation. You do have any right to decide how other's live their own private lives how or when another human being's life and rights begin. . It does not matter that brain dead homophobic pro abortion butt wad full of hate. Which is what you are.

 

[0311]

The OP is consumed with ha . Such clear and ugly homophobia on display. Hate is NOT a pro-life value and sure as shit ain't "Christian".

 

[Chuz Life]

Wrong.



Nope.

Marriage is between two consenting adults.

It's not hard to grasp. If you WANT to.

.

Any two consenting adults?

 

[Chuz Life]

The OP is consumed with ha . Such clear and ugly homophobia on display. Hate is NOT a pro-life value and sure as shit ain't "Christian".

When they finally realize that I'm not coming at any of this shit from a religious viewpoint!

Priceless.

 

[0311]

When they finally realize that I'm not coming at any of this shit from a religious viewpoint!

Priceless.

m

When they finally realize that I'm not coming at any of this shit from a religious viewpoint!

Priceless.

No You're full of hate. That is where you come from and it is disgusingl.