Mr.Conley
Senior Member
No, you're saying that a general argument for gay marriage was that it would strengthen the institution of marriage. Before now, I had never heard this claim, and the examples you managed to provide can only be said to support your position with, to say the least, some twisting of the context. Then again, I don't care enough to be dragged into such a minor debate beyond this point. This is all you'll hear from me on the subject.Karl Marx said:No generalization was made. I claimed that it was an argument for gay marriage and provided some links. The authors of each of the links I supplied made the same argument in one form or another (among others), i.e., gay marriage would help marriage in general.