Man Sprays Unknown Substance on Ilhan Omar (D-MN) at Townhall

Your link says it’s plunging while left wing violence is surging

Do you m know what surging means?

Moron, again, did you now finally discover that rightwing violence exists?

Yes leftwing violence exists, so does rightwing violence. It's just that it seems you are too fucked in the head to be able to aknowledge the later.
 
Moron, again, did you now finally discover that rightwing violence exists?
When did I say it didn’t exist? Seems like it’s barely in existence but it does exist

Meanwhile leftwing violence continues to surge and be a bigger threat then Muslim extremist
 

Blah blah blah, go ahead and provide examples of categorized rightwing violence that you refute as rightwing.

Maybe the crazy anti-abortionist who shot up Democrats in MN with a kill list of abortion providers wasn't a rightwinger? :cuckoo:

Maybe all the cop-beating J6ers were liber-huls? :rolleyes-41:
 
Last edited:
There is no indication of what it was and she appeared to be fine. She resumed speaking after the incident. People are getting crazier.


No idea why my mind went straight to her brother as a suspect and possible source of the substance.
 
When did I say it didn’t exist?

What right wing violence?

vito-sopranos-this-guy.gif
 
Blah blah blah, go ahead and provide examples of categorized rightwing violence that you refute as rightwing.
If your flawed article were transparent enough to list who and why they list who they did, that’d be one thing to discuss. But, they don’t. And I suspect that the reason they don’t is because they don’t want the scrutiny.
Maybe the crazy anti-abortionist who shot up Democrats in MN with a kill list of abortion providers wasn't a rightwinger? :cuckoo:
Not sure who you’re talking about.
Maybe all the cop-beating J6ers were liber-huls? :rolleyes-41:
Jesus man, you were talking about RW violence in 25, and provided an article that

1. Has a headline in direct contradiction of your premise.

2. Has NOTHING to do with J6

I suggest you do better at making an argument. Your source is crap, and your bitter hatred for anyone remotely connected to Trump seems a form of mental illness at this point…
 
If your flawed article were transparent enough to list who and why they list who they did, that’d be one thing to discuss. But, they don’t. And I suspect that the reason they don’t is because they don’t want the scrutiny.

In other words you don't actually know if it is or isn't flawed, because you don't know the details...but will just assert it to be flawed anyway because you don't like the conclusions.
 
Moron, again, did you now finally discover that rightwing violence exists?

Yes leftwing violence exists, so does rightwing violence. It's just that it seems you are too fucked in the head to be able to aknowledge the later.
One is offensive the majority of the time, and the other one is defensive the majority of the time... Now choose which one you think fits the profiles of the two. Be honest now.

To help you out, which one of the two groups are engaging in deplorable thing's that endanger civilized society, otherwise a society built on obeying the religious tenant's set forth in the Holy Bible for centuries now ??

Most know and understand the answer to this, but let's see how you spin it like the leftist spin myster you are.
 
Jesus man, you were talking about RW violence in 25, and provided an article that

1. Has a headline in direct contradiction of your premise.

2. Has NOTHING to do with J6

Nope, wrong again, my comment was about rightwing violence through the years, not specifically isolated to 2025.
 
One is offensive the majority of the time, and the other one is defensive the majority of the time

SOURCE

What is "defensive" about rightwingers violently breaking into the capitol on Janury 6th? Nothing.

4tliby.gif


What is "defensive" about a rightwinger plowing his car through a crowd? Nothing.

49162538-7fb7-11e7-a4e8-566dbe2c7097.jpg


What is "defensive" about a rightwinger walking into a church to kill some blacks? Nothing

21website-web-articleLarge.jpg



What is "defensive" about a rightwinger shooting up Minessota Democrats? Nothing.

16753661_061425-wls-ward-mn-shootings-recut-10p-vid.jpg
 
Last edited:
Geez how can we forget about tampon Timmy’s political appointee going nuts on tampon’s political rivals ?

He was a rightwinger anti-abortionist, which motivated his killing spree.

You are seriously ill in the head.
 
15th post
SOURCE

What is "defensive" about rightwingers violently breaking into the capitol on Janury 6th? Nothing.

4tliby.gif


What is "defensive" about a rightwinger plowing his car through a crowd? Nothing.

49162538-7fb7-11e7-a4e8-566dbe2c7097.jpg


What is "defensive" about a rightwinger walking into a church to kill some blacks? Nothing

21website-web-articleLarge.jpg



What is "defensive" about a rightwinger shooting up Minessota Democrats? Nothing.

16753661_061425-wls-ward-mn-shootings-recut-10p-vid.jpg
You act as if the acts were spontaneous with no back stories behind them.

In some cases the acts were orchestrated by mentally disturbed individual's that had back grounds or histories tied to mental illness, otherwise that ultimately led to their final meltdowns. You can label them as republicans or whatever types you want for your political attempt at tying them too the republican party, but no one is stupid enough too not see through the leftist liberal attempts to somehow use mentally ill people in a political way.

As far as J6ers go, yes that back story had involved 4+year's of Democrats attacking Trump after the 2016 election, and attacking Republicans relentlessly for those 4 year's straight along with him. We will consider J6 as finally the Republicans standing their ground on the issue's (defensive), and them not taking the Democrats BS anymore. TRUMP pardoning them was absolutely the right thing to do.

Summary:
The bottom line is your Democrats are dirty or play dirty, and in many cases they've brought about the patriots getting all lawyered up on them or protesting loudly from many sectors against them.

Charlie Kirk paid the ultimate price for thinking that he could help the left change, and he thought that maybe they would begin to see things in a different light, but hell no the leftist wasn't going to let nobody spoil their damned twisted lifestyle or party being lived, oh hell no right ??

Clean up your dam acts already.. Good grief.
 
He was a rightwinger anti-abortionist, which motivated his killing spree.

You are seriously ill in the head.
He was tampon Timmy’s political apoonteee that already admitted to doing it to help tampon Timmy
 
Back
Top Bottom