This is horrible. Especially since it didn't seem like safety precautions were exercised very well. RIP to this poor man and my condolences to his friends and family. 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw the same thing when I was in HS 50 years ago
It wasn’t the Hammer but 35 lb weight
I was on the track and some guy threw it onto the track where we were running
We managed to dodge it but it was close
Wrong. Assumption of risk applies. School will probably compensate but not required by law.I'm guessing a minimum of $20million will be paid by the school.
The court will decide that.Wrong. Assumption of risk applies. School will probably compensate but not required by law.
It called tort law. It was established centuries ago. The person attended the event voluntarily and assumes the risk of being injured.The court will decide that.
The protective netting installation was faulty as it didn't protect the man. If there was no protective netting, then the 'assumption of risk' would apply. Recall in the early days of hockey there were as many spectators missing teeth as players.
Some hockey arenas have protective barriers that reach to the ceiling now. Whoever design that school barrier assumed that such an event would never happen. As an agent of the school his liability passes to the school.
This is horrible. Especially since it didn't seem like safety precautions were exercised very well. RIP to this poor man and my condolences to his friends and family.
I excelled at all three and killed no one.Tragic but, no reason to ban sports like discus, javelin or hammer.
Did you think about it?I excelled at all three and killed no one.
I knew where people were when starting a throw.Did you think about it?
Some men are so macho. Woke women say they hate that. Until..........Evidently, the man stepped in the way to protect his family
Crushed?
If a crowd is wanted by whoever is in charge of the event, they had better make the location of the event as safe as humanly possible.It called tort law. It was established centuries ago. The person attended the event voluntarily and assumes the risk of being injured.
An example we studied in graduate school was a school bus driver was given free admission to the high school football game . She was struck by an errant kick with the football and injured. She tried to sue the school for negligence. The school was not held responsible because she was not required to be there, just like any other attendee.
The same would apply if the accident occurred with appropriate safety measures.
Like I said, the event organizers will likely compensate, but their chances in court for a larger settlement are small.
Of course, but if they did, they are not liable.If a crowd is wanted by whoever is in charge of the event, they had better make the location of the event as safe as humanly possible.
God bless you and the victim's family always!!!
Holly
I wish we could track the case.It called tort law. It was established centuries ago. The person attended the event voluntarily and assumes the risk of being injured.
An example we studied in graduate school was a school bus driver was given free admission to the high school football game . She was struck by an errant kick with the football and injured. She tried to sue the school for negligence. The school was not held responsible because she was not required to be there, just like any other attendee.
The same would apply if the accident occurred with appropriate safety measures.
Like I said, the event organizers will likely compensate, but their chances in court for a larger settlement are small.