Majority Disapprove of No Charges for Clinton

[Moonglow]

No, it's the usual amount they survey..They don't ask every single person in the USA...

Are you black by any chance?

I heard we all have black DNA from our ancestors in Africa...I do tan well...

 

[mamooth]

Clinton is "a good candidate and a good person"?!

Obviously, yes.

Now, I understand you believe otherwise, but you allowed yourself to be brainwashed by really dumb propaganda that every thinking person just laughed at.

That's not our problem. Keep on raging impotently for the next 9 years, if that's what you enjoy. Your masters appreciate your loyal service in their legion of Useful Idiots.

 

[Fueri]

Clinton is "a good candidate and a good person"?!

Your masters appreciate your loyal service in their legion of Useful Idiots.

Ironic post of the day award goes to......

 

[CowboyTed]

Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.

The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it would have been much different.

Where is your call for Powell and Rice to be prosecuted?

Do you how simple the Clinton defense would be... 'I did the same as my predecessors and they were never charged or even reprimanded, I thought it was the done thing...'

She can also cite the GOP deleting 5 million emails and all backups during an investigation... Again no charges...

This would have been laughed out of court and Comey knew this...

What I would question is why the FBI broke policy in releasing a statement about the investigation... We have never heard of them doing this before and his comments are being used to ridicule a person is found innocent of all charges... He released no such statements for Powell or Rice...

 

[Care4all]

Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.

The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it would have been much different.

SIMPLY NOT TRUE

Why FBI didn't prosecute Hillary Clinton on Email Issue - CNN Video

 

[Obiwan]

Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.

The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.

So Trey found no criminal activity...

Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???

 

[Moonglow]

Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.

The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.

So Trey found no criminal activity...

Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???

He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...

 

[Obiwan]

Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.

The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.

So Trey found no criminal activity...

Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???

He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...

Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...

Take that up with the FBI...

 

[Moonglow]

Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.

The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.

So Trey found no criminal activity...

Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???

He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...

Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...

Take that up with the FBI...

At least 5 million and a couple of years....

 

[Obiwan]

The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.

So Trey found no criminal activity...

Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???

He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...

Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...

Take that up with the FBI...

At least 5 million and a couple of years....

It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...

And all the networks aired the "highlights"....

 

[Care4all]

So Trey found no criminal activity...

Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???

He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...

Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...

Take that up with the FBI...

At least 5 million and a couple of years....

It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...

And all the networks aired the "highlights"....

What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?

What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?

 

[Obiwan]

Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???

He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...

Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...

Take that up with the FBI...

At least 5 million and a couple of years....

It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...

And all the networks aired the "highlights"....

What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?

What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?

Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....

 

[Care4all]

He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...

Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...

Take that up with the FBI...

At least 5 million and a couple of years....

It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...

And all the networks aired the "highlights"....

What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?

What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?

Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....

I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he said outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....

You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?

or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?

 

[Meathead]

I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he aid outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....

You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?

or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?

Perhaps you would have understood better with more of a grasp of the English language.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Poor Jeb Bush.

 

[CowboyTed]

Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...

Take that up with the FBI...

At least 5 million and a couple of years....

It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...

And all the networks aired the "highlights"....

What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?

What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?

Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....

I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he said outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....

You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?

or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?

This is what I was told:

She instructed her lawyers to release all work related emails and they, based on the headings, separated out all of those that seemed to be work related. They then told her that they had released all her work related emails.

1. Apparently the Lawyers did the job competently but not thoroughly, as the FBI did identify a few emails that should have been released.
2. Since Hillary believed her Lawyers and their statements, she did not lie. She may have been mistaken, but it does not meet minimal standards for perjury.

A couple of points for those who didn’t pay attention the last time a Clinton was baselessly charged: Lying is not perjury. It has to be material to the investigation in order to be perjury. Obviously this didn’t meet that standard since none of her emails were informative to the case. The second is that being mistaken is not a lie. If a New York Times reader believed that there were extant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they would be mistaken, but their statements would not knowingly be false. When the British politicians stated that, however, they were lying.

 

[Obiwan]

At least 5 million and a couple of years....

It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...

And all the networks aired the "highlights"....

What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?

What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?

Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....

I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he said outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....

You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?

or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?

This is what I was told:

She instructed her lawyers to release all work related emails and they, based on the headings, separated out all of those that seemed to be work related. They then told her that they had released all her work related emails.

1. Apparently the Lawyers did the job competently but not thoroughly, as the FBI did identify a few emails that should have been released.
2. Since Hillary believed her Lawyers and their statements, she did not lie. She may have been mistaken, but it does not meet minimal standards for perjury.

A couple of points for those who didn’t pay attention the last time a Clinton was baselessly charged: Lying is not perjury. It has to be material to the investigation in order to be perjury. Obviously this didn’t meet that standard since none of her emails were informative to the case. The second is that being mistaken is not a lie. If a New York Times reader believed that there were extant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they would be mistaken, but their statements would not knowingly be false. When the British politicians stated that, however, they were lying.

Would those be the same lawyers that Comey said she gave access to classified information (in some of the emails) to, in spite of the fact that they didn't have the necessary security clearances???

 

[CowboyTed]

It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...

And all the networks aired the "highlights"....

What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?

What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?

Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....

I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he said outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....

You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?

or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?

This is what I was told:

She instructed her lawyers to release all work related emails and they, based on the headings, separated out all of those that seemed to be work related. They then told her that they had released all her work related emails.

1. Apparently the Lawyers did the job competently but not thoroughly, as the FBI did identify a few emails that should have been released.
2. Since Hillary believed her Lawyers and their statements, she did not lie. She may have been mistaken, but it does not meet minimal standards for perjury.

A couple of points for those who didn’t pay attention the last time a Clinton was baselessly charged: Lying is not perjury. It has to be material to the investigation in order to be perjury. Obviously this didn’t meet that standard since none of her emails were informative to the case. The second is that being mistaken is not a lie. If a New York Times reader believed that there were extant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they would be mistaken, but their statements would not knowingly be false. When the British politicians stated that, however, they were lying.

Would those be the same lawyers that Comey said she gave access to classified information (in some of the emails) to, in spite of the fact that they didn't have the necessary security clearances???

If you think you have a case, go on and try... A remedial lawyer will just show that Powell, Rice and Bush administration did the same thing and worse. He will ask every GOP guy who did the same thing will have to be tried as well...

And that is before they ask what was in the classified emails... The State dept says that 70% of classified information is classified in error...

One of the classified mails was supposed to be a phone call to Mali politician to congratulate him on getting elected...

This is a simple case of you thought you had her and got the FBI said you don't and now you are throwing toys out of the pram.