JLW
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2012
- 18,269
- 20,137
- 2,405
For years, the pesticide manufacturer Bayer has battled thousands of lawsuits claiming that its weed killer Roundup causes cancer in people who use it frequently.
Now, the Republican-controlled Congress could deliver the company a crucial victory. A provision tucked into a government spending bill could shield Bayer and other pesticides makers from billions of dollars in payouts to plaintiffs.
The proposal follows intense lobbying by Bayer and other industry interests over the past year. But it has sparked outrage from a new force in Washington: followers of the “Make America Healthy Again” movement.
The controversy highlights tensions within President Trump’s political base over the pesticides in the nation’s food supply. Tensions flared this month after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. released a report on childhood health that disappointed many MAHA activists who felt it didn’t go far enough to rein in pesticides. The divisions within the president’s base could resurface ahead of the midterm elections next fall.
**************************
So should manufacturers of cancer causing pesticides be shielded from liability or should they be protected? Who do you agree with: MAGA or MAHA?
Personally, seems like a no brainer to me. Keep poisonous pesticides out of our food supplies and if a company does produce pesticides that cause cancer they should be held accountable.
Now, the Republican-controlled Congress could deliver the company a crucial victory. A provision tucked into a government spending bill could shield Bayer and other pesticides makers from billions of dollars in payouts to plaintiffs.
The proposal follows intense lobbying by Bayer and other industry interests over the past year. But it has sparked outrage from a new force in Washington: followers of the “Make America Healthy Again” movement.
The controversy highlights tensions within President Trump’s political base over the pesticides in the nation’s food supply. Tensions flared this month after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. released a report on childhood health that disappointed many MAHA activists who felt it didn’t go far enough to rein in pesticides. The divisions within the president’s base could resurface ahead of the midterm elections next fall.
**************************
So should manufacturers of cancer causing pesticides be shielded from liability or should they be protected? Who do you agree with: MAGA or MAHA?
Personally, seems like a no brainer to me. Keep poisonous pesticides out of our food supplies and if a company does produce pesticides that cause cancer they should be held accountable.
Last edited:
