I'm not aware of much of the things said, because I focus on tallying votes and responding to mentions. As with Rosie, when allegations of cheating offsite are made I ask for some sort of evidence, anything, that serves as a basis. The same goes with dealing with socks, I would imagine. Rosie made mention that there was cheating going on but did not disclose any sort of evidence that could be considered. I have PM'd Sameech asking him too for something of substance, but his account is not accepting PMs. I cannot modkill a player for offsite cheating if it's a supposition. There has to be something tangible that can be used objectively.
Sameech was asked to help explain gameplay with the newer players, because it would be a good thing, and at the main site it's exactly that same way with "SEs" and "ICs."
I can't punish a player because of "I think so," or "I know it." That's how you lynch players, but not how USMB members get treated by the host. If you suspect someone is cheating, please PM me. Something tangible, like a link to somewhere that has players actively cheating offsite, is something that would be used. Suspicion alone is not enough. As for players talking about our ongoing game in USMB thread, I'm stamping that out by the end of Sunday.
It was an allegation because the player said so.
That isn't "I think so...." it is "I read it."
There needs to be a rule that one dies not use rulebreaking as strategy in or out of the game.
Once one has admitted to rulebreaking, even as a red herring, the well is poisoned.
I will keep repeating until comprehended.
You cannot give links unless you are an invited participant.
Not saying it occurred, but saying I read in the game that a player admitted to it.
You cannot be allowed to play that falsely. Trying to psyche out by claiming rulebreaking is out of bounds of legit play.
And others of a cabal get blamed, too.
Get it yet?
Regards from Rosie