Longshoreman's Union VP Has a Message About Trump That Will Likely Sicken Dems

[Jarlaxle]

/——/ You are intentionally ignoring the CBO report. Believe what you want.

Have you not figured out Joey yet? He ignores facts he doesn't like, invents his own "facts" to fit his lies, ignores anything that shows he is wrong, and just keeps repeating The Big Lie until people get tired of responding to the same bullshit (garnished, as always, with his typical grade-school insults) for the thirtieth time. Joey spends every waking moment trolling this forum.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Have you not figured out Joey yet? He ignores facts he doesn't like, invents his own "facts" to fit his lies, ignores anything that shows he is wrong, and just keeps repeating The Big Lie until people get tires of responding to the same bullshit (garnished, as always, with his typical grade-school insults) for the thirtieth time. Joey spends every waking moment trolling this forum.

/—-/ I still respond with facts for the benefit of others who may not know the truth. His distortions and lies can’t go unanswered even if he rejects them.

 

[initforme]

Does it matter if the longshoreman make a markedly better wage after their strike?

 

[JoeB131]

You are splitting hairs. Run on eliminating the Electoral College and disenfranchising most of the Country.

I would be for eliminating the EC< which already disenfranchised the residents of 43 states.

 

[JoeB131]

/——/ You are intentionally ignoring the CBO report. Believe what you want.

Because it's bullshit.

Look, man, you can put lipstick on a pig, but a pig it still is.

Voodoo Economics didn't work 40 years ago, and they don't work now.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Because it's bullshit.

Look, man, you can put lipstick on a pig, but a pig it still is.

Voodoo Economics didn't work 40 years ago, and they don't work now.

/——/ And you know better than the CBO.
BWHAHAHAHA BWHAHAHAHA

 

[JoeB131]

And you know better than the CBO.

You mean the CBO that hasn't passed a balanced budget in my lifetime?

 

[Cellblock2429]

You mean the CBO that hasn't passed a balanced budget in my lifetime?

/—-/ Congress passes the budgets, not the CBO. GEEEZE are you that dense or just frustrated you can’t refute it.

 

[JoeB131]

/—-/ Congress passes the budgets, not the CBO. GEEEZE are you that dense or just frustrated you can’t refute it.

No, I just don't take them seriously when the fact that deficits increase every time that some idiot cuts taxes on rich people, and they claim, "Revenues increased", which they didn't.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I would be for eliminating the EC< which already disenfranchised the residents of 43 states.

Good luck winning over the 43 states. You people only advocate for eliminating the EC when you lose. How about expanding the Supreme Court from 9 to 12? You people were all over that when Biden took office. How about now? Trump would love three (3) nominations. Be consistent.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Good luck winning over the 43 states. You people only advocate for eliminating the EC when you lose. How about expanding the Supreme Court from 9 to 12? You people were all over that when Biden took office. How about now? Trump would love three (3) nominations. Be consistent.

/—-/ And what about the Blue States who signed a contract to give their EC votes to the candidate who won the popular votes?

 

[JoeB131]

Good luck winning over the 43 states. You people only advocate for eliminating the EC when you lose. How about expanding the Supreme Court from 9 to 12? You people were all over that when Biden took office. How about now? Trump would love three (3) nominations. Be consistent.

Expanding SCOTUS was always a non-starter. A smarter move would be to impose term limits that would get rid of Thomas, Alito, and Roberts and replace them with sensible people.

/—-/ And what about the Blue States who signed a contract to give their EC votes to the candidate who won the popular votes?

What about them? That was only if enough states signed on to eliminate the need for the EC.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Expanding SCOTUS was always a non-starter. A smarter move would be to impose term limits that would get rid of Thomas, Alito, and Roberts and replace them with sensible people.



What about them? That was only if enough states signed on to eliminate the need for the EC.

/—-/ Keep changing the rules until democRATs win.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Expanding SCOTUS was always a non-starter. A smarter move would be to impose term limits that would get rid of Thomas, Alito, and Roberts and replace them with sensible people.

Term limits also stop the activism of Kagan, Sotomayor, and Brown who view the Court as a tool to make law, not interpret it.

 

[JoeB131]

/—-/ Keep changing the rules until democRATs win.

Or just do something sensible like elect the president by popular vote.

Term limits also stop the activism of Kagan, Sotomayor, and Brown who view the Court as a tool to make law, not interpret it.

I'd have no problem with that. SCOTUS shouldn't be making law one way or the other.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Or just do something sensible like elect the president by popular vote.



I'd have no problem with that. SCOTUS shouldn't be making law one way or the other.

/——-/ The EC is sensible and worked perfectly for 200+ years until democRATs started losing elections.

 

[Billiejeens]

does nothing of the sort.

How do you explain how every time the GOP cuts taxes, deficits balloon?

Trump added 8 Trillion in debt in four years. A record for a single term. (I'm sure he'll add a lot more in his second term.)

Unrelated to the reduction in tax rates
Spending goes through the roof so that retards can post what you posted

 

[JoeB131]

/——-/ The EC is sensible and worked perfectly for 200+ years until democRATs started losing elections.

The EC has always been a disaster.

The only reason why it isn't more of one is that except for five cases, the EC just confirmed the popular vote.

The five cases where it didn't, bad stuff happened.

 

[Cellblock2429]

No, I just don't take them seriously when the fact that deficits increase every time that some idiot cuts taxes on rich people, and they claim, "Revenues increased", which they didn't.

/—-/ Do you really think Congress would use any tax increases to pay down the debt?

 

[JoeB131]

/—-/ Do you really think Congress would use any tax increases to pay down the debt?

Clinton did.

It's why he was the last guy to give us a balanced budget.