Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Personally I think he is a Dick, that said, I totally agree with him here. I did not get far into the Presentation, I didn't need to, to accept the validity of His point.
Personally I think he is a Dick, that said, I totally agree with him here. I did not get far into the Presentation, I didn't need to, to accept the validity of His point.
anthony rocks.![]()
Personally I think he is a Dick, that said, I totally agree with him here. I did not get far into the Presentation, I didn't need to, to accept the validity of His point.
anthony rocks.![]()
Weiner does not "rock."
HOWEVER, that said, I agree with Intense. The GOP crafted the Rule and, like Weiner says, it is a good rule.
Weiner's criticism of the very shallow (faux) "effort" to "comply" with that rule in the case of HR 358 is pretty much right on the money.
I don't say this often, but good for Rep. Weiner.
anthony rocks.![]()
Weiner does not "rock."
HOWEVER, that said, I agree with Intense. The GOP crafted the Rule and, like Weiner says, it is a good rule.
Weiner's criticism of the very shallow (faux) "effort" to "comply" with that rule in the case of HR 358 is pretty much right on the money.
I don't say this often, but good for Rep. Weiner.
yes, he does rock... which is why you rightwingnuts hate him. if he weren't effective, you wouldn't pay him any mind.
and if he kept the loons from doing something, i'm all for it.![]()
Gotta agree! Republican would certainly hold a Democrat's feet to the fire. It's only fair that they be held to the same standards.Personally I think he is a Dick, that said, I totally agree with him here. I did not get far into the Presentation, I didn't need to, to accept the validity of His point.
anthony rocks.![]()
Weiner does not "rock."
HOWEVER, that said, I agree with Intense. The GOP crafted the Rule and, like Weiner says, it is a good rule.
Weiner's criticism of the very shallow (faux) "effort" to "comply" with that rule in the case of HR 358 is pretty much right on the money.
I don't say this often, but good for Rep. Weiner.
Weiner does not "rock."
HOWEVER, that said, I agree with Intense. The GOP crafted the Rule and, like Weiner says, it is a good rule.
Weiner's criticism of the very shallow (faux) "effort" to "comply" with that rule in the case of HR 358 is pretty much right on the money.
I don't say this often, but good for Rep. Weiner.
yes, he does rock... which is why you rightwingnuts hate him. if he weren't effective, you wouldn't pay him any mind.
and if he kept the loons from doing something, i'm all for it.![]()
No. Not at all. I also agree with Intense when he notes that the aptly named Weiner is a dick. That he is.
And he's not effective. He's just a loud braying jackass. Typical of the whole lot of liberal Democratics infesting Congress these many years. But the fact that he's a loud, odious, braying jackass, little prick leads you leftwingnuts to applaud him as though he were worth anything.
He's not.
yes, he does rock... which is why you rightwingnuts hate him. if he weren't effective, you wouldn't pay him any mind.
and if he kept the loons from doing something, i'm all for it.![]()
No. Not at all. I also agree with Intense when he notes that the aptly named Weiner is a dick. That he is.
And he's not effective. He's just a loud braying jackass. Typical of the whole lot of liberal Democratics infesting Congress these many years. But the fact that he's a loud, odious, braying jackass, little prick leads you leftwingnuts to applaud him as though he were worth anything.
He's not.
puleeze. you're just annoyed that he doesn't let the loons walk all over him.
i think i recall a thread where you were all about how *he* didn't do well in a fauxnews interview. and then, interestingly, i actually watched the video and he decimated the abrasive woman who was interviewing him and cutting him off. as i recall (and my memory is pretty good), you said that he couldn't answer her and was looking all around for a way out. then in watching the actual video and not listening to your spin, it turned out that she was interrupting him repeatedly so he treated her like a kindergardener and waited til she stopped shrieking at him.
so you'll forgive me if i ignore your spin and call it what it is.
if he annoys you this much, anthony really rocks.![]()
I can only imagine the cacophony of jeers and catcalls from the left, if there were anyone with an (R) by their name who acted like the churlish little shitheel as Weiner does.Personally I think he is a Dick, that said, I totally agree with him here. I did not get far into the Presentation, I didn't need to, to accept the validity of His point.
anthony rocks.![]()
Weiner does not "rock."
HOWEVER, that said, I agree with Intense. The GOP crafted the Rule and, like Weiner says, it is a good rule.
Weiner's criticism of the very shallow (faux) "effort" to "comply" with that rule in the case of HR 358 is pretty much right on the money.
I don't say this often, but good for Rep. Weiner.
Weiner does not "rock."
HOWEVER, that said, I agree with Intense. The GOP crafted the Rule and, like Weiner says, it is a good rule.
Weiner's criticism of the very shallow (faux) "effort" to "comply" with that rule in the case of HR 358 is pretty much right on the money.
I don't say this often, but good for Rep. Weiner.
yes, he does rock... which is why you rightwingnuts hate him. if he weren't effective, you wouldn't pay him any mind.
and if he kept the loons from doing something, i'm all for it.![]()
No. Not at all. I also agree with Intense when he notes that the aptly named Weiner is a dick. That he is.
And he's not effective. He's just a loud braying jackass. Typical of the whole lot of liberal Democratics infesting Congress these many years. But the fact that he's a loud, odious, braying jackass, little prick leads you leftwingnuts to applaud him as though he were worth anything.
He's not.
yes, he does rock... which is why you rightwingnuts hate him. if he weren't effective, you wouldn't pay him any mind.
and if he kept the loons from doing something, i'm all for it.![]()
No. Not at all. I also agree with Intense when he notes that the aptly named Weiner is a dick. That he is.
And he's not effective. He's just a loud braying jackass. Typical of the whole lot of liberal Democratics infesting Congress these many years. But the fact that he's a loud, odious, braying jackass, little prick leads you leftwingnuts to applaud him as though he were worth anything.
He's not.
He sucks because he's loud. This is an excellent basis to diagnosis the suckitude of someone.
No. Not at all. I also agree with Intense when he notes that the aptly named Weiner is a dick. That he is.
And he's not effective. He's just a loud braying jackass. Typical of the whole lot of liberal Democratics infesting Congress these many years. But the fact that he's a loud, odious, braying jackass, little prick leads you leftwingnuts to applaud him as though he were worth anything.
He's not.
He sucks because he's loud. This is an excellent basis to diagnosis the suckitude of someone.
Well, that also was not my contention. But enjoy arguing against your straw-man creations.
In the meanwhile, back here in reality (where you seem uninvited), noting that a loud braying jackass is a loud braying jackass is not the same as saying that he sucks merely because he is a loud braying jackass.
On the other hand, you do seem fond of braying.