Logic and facts v groups

Captain Caveman

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
18,022
Reaction score
11,063
Points
1,138
Location
England
Social Identity Theory (SIT).

What I've witnessed with two groups on this forum, the Pro Abortionists and Gun Nuts, is what happens when they get cornered with logic and facts in debates.

The Pro Abortionists go quiet. They won't answer the logical question, they avoid it and go quiet. They know they're cornered. They think that's the best response to the question.

Gun Nuts resort to cliché mode. They need to be more manly and macho, so rather than go quiet, they avoid the logic and facts question when cornered with a cliché (the list of them can be found in Bad Lands). They think that's a great response to the question.

I need to watch other groups too but by all means add your observations. But there's some feedback, keep an eye out.
 
Social Identity Theory (SIT).

What I've witnessed with two groups on this forum, the Pro Abortionists and Gun Nuts, is what happens when they get cornered with logic and facts in debates.

The Pro Abortionists go quiet. They won't answer the logical question, they avoid it and go quiet. They know they're cornered. They think that's the best response to the question.

Gun Nuts resort to cliché mode. They need to be more manly and macho, so rather than go quiet, they avoid the logic and facts question when cornered with a cliché (the list of them can be found in Bad Lands). They think that's a great response to the question.

I need to watch other groups too but by all means add your observations. But there's some feedback, keep an eye out.
You're not interested in a sincere discussion on abortion. All the answers are readily available for consideration by Americans.

We can start with the fact that America is the most pro violence and death country in the world, next to Israel. That's simply contradicts the pro-life bullshit.

And so, the answer to the guns too is answered at the same time!
 
You're not interested in a sincere discussion on abortion. All the answers are readily available for consideration by Americans.

We can start with the fact that America is the most pro violence and death country in the world, next to Israel. That's simply contradicts the pro-life bullshit.

And so, the answer to the guns too is answered at the same time!
You missed the point of the topic, twice. It's is about SIT, if you wish to analyse any topics within any mentioned group, there's plenty of relevant threads.
 
Last edited:
Social Identity Theory (SIT).

What I've witnessed with two groups on this forum, the Pro Abortionists and Gun Nuts, is what happens when they get cornered with logic and facts in debates.

The Pro Abortionists go quiet. They won't answer the logical question, they avoid it and go quiet. They know they're cornered. They think that's the best response to the question.

Gun Nuts resort to cliché mode. They need to be more manly and macho, so rather than go quiet, they avoid the logic and facts question when cornered with a cliché (the list of them can be found in Bad Lands). They think that's a great response to the question.

I need to watch other groups too but by all means add your observations. But there's some feedback, keep an eye out.
Big flaw in your hypothesis is that one sides' "logic and facts" are the other sides "delusions and disinformation".
FWIW & FYI such is how I've seen most of what you present thinking such are "logic and facts".
Also, you have a biased and incomplete grasp on what you think are "logic and facts".

Anti-Abortionists and Anti-Gun Nuts are also groups and have their own pre-set scripts.

For the Anti-Abortionists, one of many concerns (and counter "logic and facts") is that the fetus=future citizen and the father("sperm donor") are left out of the decision process. A major hypocrisy is that if the women decides to give birth and keep the child, the father usually gets obligated for child support, yet as mentioned, he had no say(Rights) in the matter of abortion or not.

For the Anti-Gun Nuts one of their many cases of "logic and facts" is that a 100 pound women should not have Right for possession of a firearm to protect herself from a 250 pound male that wants to rape her.

:rolleyes:
 
You're not interested in a sincere discussion on abortion. All the answers are readily available for consideration by Americans.

We can start with the fact that America is the most pro violence and death country in the world, next to Israel. That's simply contradicts the pro-life bullshit.

And so, the answer to the guns too is answered at the same time!
I have a thread on the Abortion narrative that I'm still waiting for a "pro-life" advocate like you to step up and present a cogent argument. I'm sure it won't be you, so I'm just sayin.
 
Just something to muse on:

If a woman is pregnant is attacked and murdered, the perp that did it is charged with a double homicide. How can this be murder if abortions are approved up to actual birth or beforehand?
 
Unwanted pregnancies are 100% avoidable, and most people support allowing rape victims and mentally ill women to have abortions already. There is no genuine need to legalize millions of babies being killed merely because they're 'inconvenient' and a lot of women are too lazy or undisciplined to exercise common sense. It desensitizes society in a number of ways, none of them good. Unless of course you're just a mindless narcissistic sociopath with zero awareness outside yourself and no self-control.

Libertoon 'logic':


"NAMBLA"logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained."


Stirling S. Newberry
 
Social Identity Theory (SIT).

What I've witnessed with two groups on this forum, the Pro Abortionists and Gun Nuts, is what happens when they get cornered with logic and facts in debates.

The Pro Abortionists go quiet. They won't answer the logical question, they avoid it and go quiet. They know they're cornered. They think that's the best response to the question.

Gun Nuts resort to cliché mode. They need to be more manly and macho, so rather than go quiet, they avoid the logic and facts question when cornered with a cliché (the list of them can be found in Bad Lands). They think that's a great response to the question.

I need to watch other groups too but by all means add your observations. But there's some feedback, keep an eye out.
Wot
We have rifles cause George Washington and other founding fathers who kicked yer asses warned us that my government may devolve into pure evil..................... and I like venison

ghbbnnhhhjjj.webp
 
Where is a list of those 81% we started?
 
Wot
We have rifles cause George Washington and other founding fathers who kicked yer asses warned us that my government may devolve into pure evil..................... and I like venison

View attachment 1023103
Erm, yet another Yankee cliché. If your education was honest with you retards, you would learn something -



Not only most of those in the British colonies didn't own a gun, the vast majority never shot a gun in their lives, hence why the smuggling of firearms was implemented. Then when the colonies were getting their backsides kicked, the French had to save their ass. So, the colonies turning into Americans have never won a war in their lives without an ally.

If you ever want to know history, even your own, ask a Brit.
 
Social Identity Theory (SIT).

What I've witnessed with two groups on this forum, the Pro Abortionists and Gun Nuts, is what happens when they get cornered with logic and facts in debates.
Cool, another pro-lifer weeping out his butthurt. We just don't get enough of those threads.

If pro-lifers could debate us, then they'd debate us. They can't, so we get evasion threads like this one.

Should you be able to locate your gonads, we're still here. Are you up to the challenge? Given your side's history, we don't have high hopes. But who knows, maybe you'll surprise everyone and be the first pro-lifer who doesn't pout and run.
 
Cool, another pro-lifer weeping out his butthurt. We just don't get enough of those threads.

If pro-lifers could debate us, then they'd debate us. They can't, so we get evasion threads like this one.

Should you be able to locate your gonads, we're still here. Are you up to the challenge? Given your side's history, we don't have high hopes. But who knows, maybe you'll surprise everyone and be the first pro-lifer who doesn't pout and run.
Not at all, anyone who wants to kill a baby, their choice. I apologise for having the brains and ability to put the conceiving choice BEFORE and not after. To me, that seems logical. Are you pro CHOICE after conceiving, followed by the words, "Shit, how did that happen?", then scream, "We demand an abortion you fucking dirty pro-lifer".

So the ball is in your court when it comes to basic and simple sex education, don't rant at me because you find it tricky.
 
Not at all, anyone who wants to kill a baby,.
You don't think abortion is killing babies. Nobody does. Pro-lifers all lie about that.

The fundamenteal claim of the pro-life movement is a lie. And it's delightful, how triggered they get when I point that out, because they know they're incapable of refuting that simple point.
 
You don't think abortion is killing babies. Nobody does. Pro-lifers all lie about that.

The fundamenteal claim of the pro-life movement is a lie. And it's delightful, how triggered they get when I point that out, because they know they're incapable of refuting that simple point.
Can answer snippet quotes when it's taken out of context.
 
Over 90% of abortions have absolutely nothing to do with rapes, incest, or health issues for the mother, they're purely for convenience, not a cause for govt. allowing murders and certainly not a cause for using taxpayer provided hospitals and insurance. That's why pro-baby killers can't debate the issue; they know they're just sociopaths and wrong.
 
Social Identity Theory (SIT).

What I've witnessed with two groups on this forum, the Pro Abortionists and Gun Nuts, is what happens when they get cornered with logic and facts in debates.

The Pro Abortionists go quiet. They won't answer the logical question, they avoid it and go quiet. They know they're cornered. They think that's the best response to the question.

Gun Nuts resort to cliché mode. They need to be more manly and macho, so rather than go quiet, they avoid the logic and facts question when cornered with a cliché (the list of them can be found in Bad Lands). They think that's a great response to the question.

I need to watch other groups too but by all means add your observations. But there's some feedback, keep an eye out.
Molon Labe!
 
Back
Top Bottom