Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

[Pogo]

It's no secret that FDR appointed a (former) member of the KKK to the Supreme Court. The photo isn't "newly discovered" at all but the liberal MSM hopes that Americans forget about the democrat party's historic ties to the KKK.

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The photo is typical very poor alt right agitprop that fails.

It is neither from the Democratic convention nor from Wisconsin.

This has been exposed for some time.

 

[Pogo]

The photo is typical very poor alt right agitprop that fails.

It is neither from the Democratic convention nor from Wisconsin.

This has been exposed for some time.

Actually it is from Wisconsin, a funeral march for a slain policeman. But the OP claimed it was New York and a political convention that had already happened five months before. And the actual Klan picnic didn't take place in either of those places but down the shoreline of New Jersey. And neither the Klan picnic nor the convention was called "Klanbake" at the time --- that turns out to have been an internet invention.

The most hilarious part of the OP's faux pas may be the phrase "newly discovered" -- a 94-year-old photo that's been documented for decades and sits in the Wisconsin Historical Society archives. Anybody could have looked that up but the OPs (two of them) chose to punk themselves and take the shame.

 

[whitehall]

It's no secret that FDR appointed a (former) member of the KKK to the Supreme Court. The photo isn't "newly discovered" at all but the liberal MSM hopes that Americans forget about the democrat party's historic ties to the KKK.

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

FDR didn't appoint a (former) member of the KKK to the supreme court? The modern argument seems to be that the democrats who were against the civil rights act and used dogs and KKK muscle to intimidate Black voters were really republicans in disguise. Do you really want to go with that argument?

 

[Syriusly]

Leftists here are STILL pissed that we freed their slaves.

Which leftists here owned slaves- specifically?

The last slaves owned in America were owned mostly by Conservative white Christians.

You know- the modern Republican Party.

 

[Syriusly]

The modern day Klan traded in their hoods and robes for business suits and live in the penthouses of NY and in Malibu/Hollywood Hills.

They also be living in shotgun shacks in Arkansas...

Trump's base because he understands. They believe his guttersnipe personality means he speaks for them.

How could they have gotten it so wrong and what's taking them so long?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

So many socks, so little difference

Thanks for the bump

It should be noted that the Democratic Party has a rich history enriched in Racism. Their policies today are a pseudo form of racism. For example, assuming Blacks are so segregated, they have no means to obtain, or even lack a government ID that could be required at the voting booth.

Other examples are Democratic policies, where their lack of economic initiatives which allows the poor, with will and ambition, to make a better life for themselves through job opportunities.

Mr Trump has changed that and is showing what this great country can do for those willing to sacrifice hard work for the reward of a weekly paycheck

-Geaux

It should be noted that the Republican Party has a rich history of enriched in Racism.
Look at how they consider most African Americans to be racists? And Jews. And Asians. And Latinos.

The Democratic Party is the party of all races- and the majority of every racial minority in America recognizes that- which is why they are members of the Democratic Party- not the Republican Party.

While the Republicans continue to call Democrats- African Americans, Jews, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans- and white Americans- racists.

 

[Syriusly]

The modern day Klan traded in their hoods and robes for business suits and live in the penthouses of NY and in Malibu/Hollywood Hills.

They also be living in shotgun shacks in Arkansas...

Trump's base because he understands. They believe his guttersnipe personality means he speaks for them.

How could they have gotten it so wrong and what's taking them so long?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

So many socks, so little difference

Mr Trump has changed that and is showing what this great country can do for those willing to sacrifice hard work for the reward of a weekly paycheck

-Geaux

Like Don the Con- you do enjoy lying in order to promote racial strife in America

Remember your doozy of a lie in the OP?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

You still pimping that lie- what a good little Trumpkin you are!

 

[JakeStarkey]

If all the conservative KKK had reformed as Black and Byrd and others, the world would be a better place.

Instead the joined the GOP.

 

[Pogo]

It's no secret that FDR appointed a (former) member of the KKK to the Supreme Court. The photo isn't "newly discovered" at all but the liberal MSM hopes that Americans forget about the democrat party's historic ties to the KKK.

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

FDR didn't appoint a (former) member of the KKK to the supreme court? The modern argument seems to be that the democrats who were against the civil rights act and used dogs and KKK muscle to intimidate Black voters were really republicans in disguise. Do you really want to go with that argument?

Care to waddle back to post 1472 and essplain to me why the Democratic Party would be electing Republicans? All of those names I put in there, plus an endorsement in the next POTUS election for Hoover, featuring a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat? Care to essplain why the 1924 Democrat Davis denounced the Klan while the 1924 Republican Coolidge wouldn't?

Care to essplain that video about all those Indiana Klan Republicans? Seems like an organization with "Democratic Party ties" wouldn't want a state run by Republicans. What am I missing?

How 'bout essplaining why an organization with "Democratic Party ties" would be working to remove a Democratic governer (Walton, Oklahoma) after he tried to drive them out? Or why a Democratic governor (Ellis Arnall, Georgia) would be the guy to revoke their charter? Or why a Democrat (LBJ) would be the first POTUS to prosecute the Klan since Grant?

Oh speaking of Grant, since you want to selectively quote history --- guess who the last POTUS was who had been a slaveowner.

 

[Syriusly]

It's no secret that FDR appointed a (former) member of the KKK to the Supreme Court. The photo isn't "newly discovered" at all but the liberal MSM hopes that Americans forget about the democrat party's historic ties to the KKK.

The GOP wants to label African Americans as supporters of the KKK, while their own Don the Con has trouble distancing himself from all of his KKK and white supremacist supporters- or denouncing them.

And by the way- LBJ appointed the first African American to the Supreme Court. Wilson appointed the first Jewish American to the Supreme Court.

Yep- the party of the KKK......lol

 

[Pogo]

The modern day Klan traded in their hoods and robes for business suits and live in the penthouses of NY and in Malibu/Hollywood Hills.

They also be living in shotgun shacks in Arkansas...

Trump's base because he understands. They believe his guttersnipe personality means he speaks for them.

How could they have gotten it so wrong and what's taking them so long?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

So many socks, so little difference

Mr Trump has changed that and is showing what this great country can do for those willing to sacrifice hard work for the reward of a weekly paycheck

-Geaux

Like Don the Con- you do enjoy lying in order to promote racial strife in America

Remember your doozy of a lie in the OP?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

You still pimping that lie- what a good little Trumpkin you are!

And even more like Don the Con --- he can't take responsibility for his fuckup.
It follows him around like a puppy.

 

[Syriusly]

It's no secret that FDR appointed a (former) member of the KKK to the Supreme Court. The photo isn't "newly discovered" at all but the liberal MSM hopes that Americans forget about the democrat party's historic ties to the KKK.

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

FDR didn't appoint a (former) member of the KKK to the supreme court? The modern argument seems to be that the democrats who were against the civil rights act and used dogs and KKK muscle to intimidate Black voters were really republicans in disguise. Do you really want to go with that argument?

Care to waddle back to post 1472 and essplain to me why the Democratic Party would be electing Republicans? All of those names I put in there, plus an endorsement in the next POTUS election for Hoover, featuring a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat? Care to essplain why the 1924 Democrat Davis denounced the Klan while the 1924 Republican Coolidge wouldn't?

Care to essplain that video about all those Indiana Klan Republicans? Seems like an organization with "Democratic Party ties" wouldn't want a state run by Republicans. What am I missing?

How 'bout essplaining why an organization with "Democratic Party ties" would be working to remove a Democratic governer (Walton, Oklahoma) after he tried to drive them out? Or why a Democratic governor (Ellis Arnall, Georgia) would be the guy to revoke their charter? Or why a Democrat (LBJ) would be the first POTUS to prosecute the Klan since Grant?

Oh speaking of Grant, since you want to selectively quote history --- guess who the last POTUS was who had been a slaveowner.

It is pretty funny that Whitehall likes to throw out KKK charges- while is a big fanboy and apologist for the Confederate Slave owning states.

 

[whitehall]

It's no secret that FDR appointed a (former) member of the KKK to the Supreme Court. The photo isn't "newly discovered" at all but the liberal MSM hopes that Americans forget about the democrat party's historic ties to the KKK.

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

FDR didn't appoint a (former) member of the KKK to the supreme court? The modern argument seems to be that the democrats who were against the civil rights act and used dogs and KKK muscle to intimidate Black voters were really republicans in disguise. Do you really want to go with that argument?

Care to waddle back to post 1472 and essplain to me why the Democratic Party would be electing Republicans? All of those names I put in there, plus an endorsement in the next POTUS election for Hoover, featuring a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat? Care to essplain why the 1924 Democrat Davis denounced the Klan while the 1924 Republican Coolidge wouldn't?

Care to essplain that video about all those Indiana Klan Republicans? Seems like an organization with "Democratic Party ties" wouldn't want a state run by Republicans. What am I missing?

How 'bout essplaining why an organization with "Democratic Party ties" would be working to remove a Democratic governer (Walton, Oklahoma) after he tried to drive them out? Or why a Democratic governor (Ellis Arnall, Georgia) would be the guy to revoke their charter? Or why a Democrat (LBJ) would be the first POTUS to prosecute the Klan since Grant?

Oh speaking of Grant, since you want to selectively quote history --- guess who the last POTUS was who had been a slaveowner.

Guess which party was the last to have senator who was a member of the KKK. Coolidge didn't denounce the Klan? Is that the best you can do? FDR had an ace in the hole with his appointment of the former KKK member. Justice Black bailed him out of the messy executive order that authorized the arrest of American citizens without due process. LBJ was so crooked that the media even made jokes about how many dead guys it took to elect him but he went against his own party with the Civil Rights act and it took republican pressure to get it passed. If you checked the wallets of the KKK operatives who were threatening and intimidating (and killing?) Black voters you would have found 100% democrat party registration.

 

[Pogo]

It's no secret that FDR appointed a (former) member of the KKK to the Supreme Court. The photo isn't "newly discovered" at all but the liberal MSM hopes that Americans forget about the democrat party's historic ties to the KKK.

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

FDR didn't appoint a (former) member of the KKK to the supreme court? The modern argument seems to be that the democrats who were against the civil rights act and used dogs and KKK muscle to intimidate Black voters were really republicans in disguise. Do you really want to go with that argument?

Care to waddle back to post 1472 and essplain to me why the Democratic Party would be electing Republicans? All of those names I put in there, plus an endorsement in the next POTUS election for Hoover, featuring a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat? Care to essplain why the 1924 Democrat Davis denounced the Klan while the 1924 Republican Coolidge wouldn't?

Care to essplain that video about all those Indiana Klan Republicans? Seems like an organization with "Democratic Party ties" wouldn't want a state run by Republicans. What am I missing?

How 'bout essplaining why an organization with "Democratic Party ties" would be working to remove a Democratic governer (Walton, Oklahoma) after he tried to drive them out? Or why a Democratic governor (Ellis Arnall, Georgia) would be the guy to revoke their charter? Or why a Democrat (LBJ) would be the first POTUS to prosecute the Klan since Grant?

Oh speaking of Grant, since you want to selectively quote history --- guess who the last POTUS was who had been a slaveowner.

Guess which party was the last to have senator who was a member of the KKK. Coolidge didn't denounce the Klan? Is that the best you can do? FDR had an ace in the hole with his appointment of the former KKK member. Justice Black bailed him out of the messy executive order that authorized the arrest of American citizens without due process. LBJ was so crooked that the media even made jokes about how many dead guys it took to elect him but he went against his own party with the Civil Rights act and it took republican pressure to get it passed. If you checked the wallets of the KKK operatives who were threatening and intimidating (and killing?) Black voters you would have found 100% democrat party registration.

The Klan has never required a political party. What it did require was that you be white, Chrisitan, specifically Protestant Christian, native-born and believe in the superiority of the white race. Nothing about politics. KKK preached "100% Americanism" but it didn't care how you got there politically.

I know this is hard for you False Dichotomists to understand but not everything in the world is made up of the two elements "Democrat" and "Republican". Actually most people are neither.

So I take it you're wimping out on all of those questions I just put to you. Not that that's a surprise.

 

[whitehall]

It's no secret that FDR appointed a (former) member of the KKK to the Supreme Court. The photo isn't "newly discovered" at all but the liberal MSM hopes that Americans forget about the democrat party's historic ties to the KKK.

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

FDR didn't appoint a (former) member of the KKK to the supreme court? The modern argument seems to be that the democrats who were against the civil rights act and used dogs and KKK muscle to intimidate Black voters were really republicans in disguise. Do you really want to go with that argument?

Care to waddle back to post 1472 and essplain to me why the Democratic Party would be electing Republicans? All of those names I put in there, plus an endorsement in the next POTUS election for Hoover, featuring a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat? Care to essplain why the 1924 Democrat Davis denounced the Klan while the 1924 Republican Coolidge wouldn't?

Care to essplain that video about all those Indiana Klan Republicans? Seems like an organization with "Democratic Party ties" wouldn't want a state run by Republicans. What am I missing?

How 'bout essplaining why an organization with "Democratic Party ties" would be working to remove a Democratic governer (Walton, Oklahoma) after he tried to drive them out? Or why a Democratic governor (Ellis Arnall, Georgia) would be the guy to revoke their charter? Or why a Democrat (LBJ) would be the first POTUS to prosecute the Klan since Grant?

Oh speaking of Grant, since you want to selectively quote history --- guess who the last POTUS was who had been a slaveowner.

Guess which party was the last to have senator who was a member of the KKK. Coolidge didn't denounce the Klan? Is that the best you can do? FDR had an ace in the hole with his appointment of the former KKK member. Justice Black bailed him out of the messy executive order that authorized the arrest of American citizens without due process. LBJ was so crooked that the media even made jokes about how many dead guys it took to elect him but he went against his own party with the Civil Rights act and it took republican pressure to get it passed. If you checked the wallets of the KKK operatives who were threatening and intimidating (and killing?) Black voters you would have found 100% democrat party registration.

The Klan has never required a political party. What it did require was that you be white, Chrisitan, specifically Protestant Christian, native-born and believe in the superiority of the white race. Nothing about politics. KKK preached "100% Americanism" but it didn't care how you got there politically.

I know this is hard for you False Dichotomists to understand but not everything in the world is made up of the two elements "Democrat" and "Republican". Actually most people are neither.

So I take it you're wimping out on all of those questions I just put to you. Not that that's a surprise.

You have it ass-backwards.. The Klan didn't have the sense or the political stability to engage in political activity. It was a case of a racist political party using the muscle of the KKK to achieve power. It worked for democrats until the 60's when the democrat party decided to use Black anger instead of fighting it. Jane Fonda and John Kerry tried to combine the Black street anger promoted by the liberal media with a crazy sort of anti-war propaganda alleged Veteran instability into the "winter soldiers" propaganda movement and ...presto...democrats flipped their image. Thanks to the liberal media the democrat party would become the party of anarchy and the poor KKK was left behind.

 

[jillian]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

Why do you make up things about what other people think?

Bad enough you’re a liar.

 

[Pogo]

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

FDR didn't appoint a (former) member of the KKK to the supreme court? The modern argument seems to be that the democrats who were against the civil rights act and used dogs and KKK muscle to intimidate Black voters were really republicans in disguise. Do you really want to go with that argument?

Care to waddle back to post 1472 and essplain to me why the Democratic Party would be electing Republicans? All of those names I put in there, plus an endorsement in the next POTUS election for Hoover, featuring a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat? Care to essplain why the 1924 Democrat Davis denounced the Klan while the 1924 Republican Coolidge wouldn't?

Care to essplain that video about all those Indiana Klan Republicans? Seems like an organization with "Democratic Party ties" wouldn't want a state run by Republicans. What am I missing?

How 'bout essplaining why an organization with "Democratic Party ties" would be working to remove a Democratic governer (Walton, Oklahoma) after he tried to drive them out? Or why a Democratic governor (Ellis Arnall, Georgia) would be the guy to revoke their charter? Or why a Democrat (LBJ) would be the first POTUS to prosecute the Klan since Grant?

Oh speaking of Grant, since you want to selectively quote history --- guess who the last POTUS was who had been a slaveowner.

Guess which party was the last to have senator who was a member of the KKK. Coolidge didn't denounce the Klan? Is that the best you can do? FDR had an ace in the hole with his appointment of the former KKK member. Justice Black bailed him out of the messy executive order that authorized the arrest of American citizens without due process. LBJ was so crooked that the media even made jokes about how many dead guys it took to elect him but he went against his own party with the Civil Rights act and it took republican pressure to get it passed. If you checked the wallets of the KKK operatives who were threatening and intimidating (and killing?) Black voters you would have found 100% democrat party registration.

The Klan has never required a political party. What it did require was that you be white, Chrisitan, specifically Protestant Christian, native-born and believe in the superiority of the white race. Nothing about politics. KKK preached "100% Americanism" but it didn't care how you got there politically.

I know this is hard for you False Dichotomists to understand but not everything in the world is made up of the two elements "Democrat" and "Republican". Actually most people are neither.

So I take it you're wimping out on all of those questions I just put to you. Not that that's a surprise.

You have it ass-backwards.. The Klan didn't have the sense or the political stability to engage in political activity. It was a case of a racist political party using the muscle of the KKK to achieve power. It worked for democrats until the 60's when the democrat party decided to use Black anger instead of fighting it. Jane Fonda and John Kerry tried to combine the Black street anger promoted by the liberal media with a crazy sort of anti-war propaganda alleged Veteran instability into the "winter soldiers" propaganda movement and ...presto...democrats flipped their image. Thanks to the liberal media the democrat party would become the party of anarchy and the poor KKK was left behind.

It didn't engage in political activity for most of its existence, but it did at the peak of its power in the 1920s. And as already noted in that time it supported and got elected Owen Brewster in Maine (Republican), Ed Jackson in Indiana (Republican), Rice Means in Colorado (Republican), George Luis Baker in Oregon (Republican), Ben Paulen in Kansas (Republican) and Clarence Morely in Colorado (not only a Republican but an active Klan member). And it worked against Jack Walton in Oklahoma (Democrat), Oscar Underwood in Alabama (Democrat), Huey Long in Louisiana (Democrat), Al Smith nationally (Democrat) and Stetson Kennedy in Florida (Democrat) who famously infiltrated the Klan and wrote an exposé and later developed a radio series to discredit the Klan in the most popular broadcast media program of the time (Superman).

All of that was WAY before the 1960s.

You still have no answer for any of that.

 

[EGR one]

Dear, God, OP-er! You and the author of the Top Secret Leaks article could not be any more dissembling in your depiction of the Democratic Party. There is no question that the KKK had a material place in the Democratic Party of 1924. This is 2017, however, and the KKK have shifted their allegiance to the Republican Party.

The protracted transformation of the GOP via what is called the "Southern Strategy" had its nascence in the post-Reconstruction days of GOP 19th century when it was little but an attempt not to entirely lose the South and found its rhetorical mark in the 1960s, something that was apparent to then contemporary observers, and squarely hit that mark in the 1980s when the GOP unabashedly and in earnest employed the hateful pathos of racial angst, aggrievance, and animosity to court provincial Southern Democrats ("Blue Dog Democrats") who found themselves corrugated within an increasingly cosmopolitan party.

Quite simply, things change.

Lastly, it is lamentably ironic -- and frankly, piteously imbecilic -- that conservatives (or anyone, really) today broker the line you have insofar as in 1924, the GOP was the party of liberals. The notion that the Democratic Party of early 20th century and before ideologically mirrors today's Democratic Party while the GOP has remained unchanged is a procrustean personification of perverse puerility. I mean, really, dude. It's just laughably f*cking-stupid!

Much like your post. A lot of words put together in sentences, but little more.

 

[Faun]

Sorry, there aren't any.

You are correct that it isn't 'newly discovered' at all. It's a completely bogus attribution attached to a completely bogus story posted by a completely bogus poster. Actually two -- Fingerboy did the same thing.

FDR didn't appoint a (former) member of the KKK to the supreme court? The modern argument seems to be that the democrats who were against the civil rights act and used dogs and KKK muscle to intimidate Black voters were really republicans in disguise. Do you really want to go with that argument?

Care to waddle back to post 1472 and essplain to me why the Democratic Party would be electing Republicans? All of those names I put in there, plus an endorsement in the next POTUS election for Hoover, featuring a vicious national smear campaign against the Democrat? Care to essplain why the 1924 Democrat Davis denounced the Klan while the 1924 Republican Coolidge wouldn't?

Care to essplain that video about all those Indiana Klan Republicans? Seems like an organization with "Democratic Party ties" wouldn't want a state run by Republicans. What am I missing?

How 'bout essplaining why an organization with "Democratic Party ties" would be working to remove a Democratic governer (Walton, Oklahoma) after he tried to drive them out? Or why a Democratic governor (Ellis Arnall, Georgia) would be the guy to revoke their charter? Or why a Democrat (LBJ) would be the first POTUS to prosecute the Klan since Grant?

Oh speaking of Grant, since you want to selectively quote history --- guess who the last POTUS was who had been a slaveowner.

Guess which party was the last to have senator who was a member of the KKK. Coolidge didn't denounce the Klan? Is that the best you can do? FDR had an ace in the hole with his appointment of the former KKK member. Justice Black bailed him out of the messy executive order that authorized the arrest of American citizens without due process. LBJ was so crooked that the media even made jokes about how many dead guys it took to elect him but he went against his own party with the Civil Rights act and it took republican pressure to get it passed. If you checked the wallets of the KKK operatives who were threatening and intimidating (and killing?) Black voters you would have found 100% democrat party registration.

The Klan has never required a political party. What it did require was that you be white, Chrisitan, specifically Protestant Christian, native-born and believe in the superiority of the white race. Nothing about politics. KKK preached "100% Americanism" but it didn't care how you got there politically.

I know this is hard for you False Dichotomists to understand but not everything in the world is made up of the two elements "Democrat" and "Republican". Actually most people are neither.

So I take it you're wimping out on all of those questions I just put to you. Not that that's a surprise.

You have it ass-backwards.. The Klan didn't have the sense or the political stability to engage in political activity. It was a case of a racist political party using the muscle of the KKK to achieve power. It worked for democrats until the 60's when the democrat party decided to use Black anger instead of fighting it. Jane Fonda and John Kerry tried to combine the Black street anger promoted by the liberal media with a crazy sort of anti-war propaganda alleged Veteran instability into the "winter soldiers" propaganda movement and ...presto...democrats flipped their image. Thanks to the liberal media the democrat party would become the party of anarchy and the poor KKK was left behind.

The klan was southern conservatives. True they were mostly Democrat back then, but today, they’re mostly Republican.

 

[Crepitus]

Wonder why?

-Geaux
--------

The picture was taken during the 1924 Democratic Convention.

It was also known as “Klanbake.”

In Madison Square Garden, New York City, from June 24 to July 9, a dispute during came up revolving around an attempt by non-Klan delegates, led by Forney Johnston of Alabama, to condemn the organization for its violence in the Democratic Party’s platform.



Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

Lol, you need to learn some history my friend. It is well known how the parties switched places. 1924 was almost a century ago.