You are cherry picking and shifting the goal post at the same time. Bombs are banned, guns are not. Both are being used as means by people with intent for the same outcome.
well, no, actually only a very few people are killed by bombs every year, but tens of thousands are killed with guns....
Probably because the people who make things you can turn into a bomb aren't insisting crazy people have a constitutional right to own them.
joe why dont you just say you agree with the reporter in the story.....what a lame analogy....and if you want to ban guns joe....change the ******* constitution....
We don't need to change the constitution. The Militia Amendment has nothing to do with gun ownership.
And since we are never going to have a sensible discussion about why we have a "terrorism' problem, we might as well learn to "live with it".
Liberals always talk about banning guns yet they never talk about banning evil (behavior).
You mean like invading other countries and pissing the people who live there off? There's a behavior I'd like to ban.
So let's review, shall we? six years ago, the west decided it didn't like Colonel Qadafi, who was kind of a dipshit, to be fair. So we decided to back rebels trying to overthrow him. Yes, Obama went along with it after the British and French instigated the thing. So Qadafi got dragged out of a ditch and shot, and the various factions who overthrew him divided up the country.
and lo and behold, a British Citizen of Libyan Descent went over there, got radicalized, and did something horrible after seeing what the west did to his home country.
