Lib Fran Leibowitz suggests Biden “dissolve” the SCOTUS

It was sarcasm. She was responding to the SCOTUS ruling that the President is not bound by law and immune for his activities so she cleverly said Biden should just dissolve the court since he is a king.
 
It was sarcasm. She was responding to the SCOTUS ruling that the President is not bound by law and immune for his activities so she cleverly said Biden should just dissolve the court since he is a king.
That just slides her statement into a different color of ignorance.
 
It was sarcasm. She was responding to the SCOTUS ruling that the President is not bound by law and immune for his activities so she cleverly said Biden should just dissolve the court since he is a king.

There was no such ruling - each of you are dumb.
 
It was sarcasm. She was responding to the SCOTUS ruling that the President is not bound by law and immune for his activities so she cleverly said Biden should just dissolve the court since he is a king.
Why do libs, like you, lie continuously? That's not what it said,
 
The argument can be made considering recent scotus ruling on immunity for "official acts".
Nope. it was a perfectly valid and rational decision. An argument can be made and proved that you’re a moron, dumfuk.
Of course it’s absurd, and Fran is absurd, but you can see where this goes with this scotus ruling.

Fran is a moron. You’re a moron. Most left wing fubar liberals are morons.

You can’t dispute the validity of the ruling you’re bitching and moaning about. Typical dumfuk behavior, you dumfuk.
 
Nope. it was a perfectly valid and rational decision. An argument can be made and proved that you’re a moron, dumfuk.


Fran is a moron. You’re a moron. Most left wing fubar liberals are morons.

You can’t dispute the validity of the ruling you’re bitching and moaning about. Typical dumfuk behavior, you dumfuk.
ok then. Biden can dissolve the supreme court, since the president has immunity for official acts.
 
ok then. Biden can dissolve the supreme court, since the president has immunity for official acts.
Wrong again, dumfuk.

The act has to be somewhere within his Constitutional duties and authorities.

Since Potato has no such duty or authority anywhere in the Constitution, he couldn’t dissolve the SCOTUS.

DAMN, you’re ignorant and stupid and dishonest, dumfuk.
 
Wrong again, dumfuk.

The act has to be somewhere within his Constitutional duties and authorities.

Since Potato has no such duty or authority anywhere in the Constitution, he couldn’t dissolve the SCOTUS.

DAMN, you’re ignorant and stupid and dishonest, dumfuk.
what-constitutes-an-official-act-that-is-covered-by-v0-zsxyahdigowc1.jpeg
 
Wrong again, dumfuk.

The act has to be somewhere within his Constitutional duties and authorities.

Since Potato has no such duty or authority anywhere in the Constitution, he couldn’t dissolve the SCOTUS.

DAMN, you’re ignorant and stupid and dishonest, dumfuk.

Their entire echo chamber was convinced of this utter stupidity.

They are a Cult, real-world things are antithetical to them.
 
Back
Top Bottom