Err, no. YOu misunderstand the point. That would be a homosexual..
You can come out of the closet about that too if you like --- live your truth
Cuck suggests weakness and lack of Will..
As in your lack of will to acknowledge that the core intentions behind confederate statues were for white supremacy
But I expect that coming from a person with such moral weakness.
Instead, I rightfully point that you, a lib, using it, is like a child dressing up in daddy's clothes, pretending to be something you are not.
So in other words, calling you a cuck was spot on......
Now back to your frivolous defense of white supremacy -- why are you so bad at it?
Is it because it is indefensible and your zeal to be racist won't let you see it?
JIm Crow, made "white supremacy" set in stone.
The claim of you lefties that the statues were a part of that, has not been supported.
The obvious counter claim, ie that they are to celebrate heritage and history, is far more likely.
Your name calling is not a supporting argument, just an admission that you cannot MAKE a valid argument, not a strong one, anyways.