Dot Com
Nullius in verba
he was trying to tell me, earlier in the day, that he wasn't an anarchist
Like another mentioned, he would be one of the first to "meet jesus" 
, were that to transpire. 
"Law" Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required
- Thread starter Contumacious
- Start date
Like another mentioned, he would be one of the first to "meet jesus" , were that to transpire. 
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #22
You do the math
tyr·an·ny
noun \ˈtir-ə-nē\
: cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others
: a government in which all power belongs to one person : the rule or authority of a tyrant
plural tyr·an·nies
Full Definition of TYRANNY
1
: oppressive power <every form of tyranny over the mind of man — Thomas Jefferson>; especially : oppressive power exerted by government <the tyranny of a police state>
slav·ery
noun \ˈslā-v(ə-)rē\
: the state of being a slave
: the practice of owning slaves
Full Definition of SLAVERY
1
: drudgery, toil
2
: submission to a dominating influence
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #24
From a Constitutional (1787) we now have a tyranny and Americans are slaves.
Now well, I am aware that some people are members of cults and they have no problem living in that setting. So if you have been conditioned to be a slave them the present conditions in the US are not a problem to you.
.
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #26
America Has Entered a New Level of Tyranny
By Dave Hodges
The Common Sense Show
November 25, 2013
Information is gathered for a purpose. We attend school, gain knowledge and acquire employment. We gather knowledge about someone we are dating and then make a decision about the future of the relationship. When the government is gathering information on us which goes beyond the basic census information, then we should be asking a lot of questions along the lines of “When will the surveillance gathering being conducted by the NSA turn into outright persecution”?
It is amazing how many Americans have never heard of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Under the NDAA, a person can be snatched off the street without cause, not allowed access to an attorney, held indefinitely, never charged with a crime and never released. An NSA identified enemy of the state could presumably be murdered and who would know?
.
By Dave Hodges
The Common Sense Show
November 25, 2013
Information is gathered for a purpose. We attend school, gain knowledge and acquire employment. We gather knowledge about someone we are dating and then make a decision about the future of the relationship. When the government is gathering information on us which goes beyond the basic census information, then we should be asking a lot of questions along the lines of “When will the surveillance gathering being conducted by the NSA turn into outright persecution”?
It is amazing how many Americans have never heard of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Under the NDAA, a person can be snatched off the street without cause, not allowed access to an attorney, held indefinitely, never charged with a crime and never released. An NSA identified enemy of the state could presumably be murdered and who would know?
.
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #27
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Because he has no facts to support his 'argument.'
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
“America Has Entered a New Level of Tyranny
By Dave Hodges”
Nonsense.
Subjective, hyperbolic opinions do not constitute 'facts.'
“It is amazing how many Americans have never heard of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Under the NDAA, a person can be snatched off the street without cause, not allowed access to an attorney, held indefinitely, never charged with a crime and never released.”
It is amazing how wrong and ignorant many demagogues can be.
The NDAA possesses no such provision, and authorizes no such action. Citizens cannot be detained by government authorities absent due process even if designated to be an "enemy combatant" (Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)).
In addition, acts of Congress are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise (see, e.g., US v. Morrison (2000)). That some might think or believe a law is un-Constitutional, or might violate their civil liberties, does not render that law in fact un-Constitutional (Clapper v. Amnesty International (2013)).
By Dave Hodges”
Nonsense.
Subjective, hyperbolic opinions do not constitute 'facts.'
“It is amazing how many Americans have never heard of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Under the NDAA, a person can be snatched off the street without cause, not allowed access to an attorney, held indefinitely, never charged with a crime and never released.”
It is amazing how wrong and ignorant many demagogues can be.
The NDAA possesses no such provision, and authorizes no such action. Citizens cannot be detained by government authorities absent due process even if designated to be an "enemy combatant" (Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)).
In addition, acts of Congress are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise (see, e.g., US v. Morrison (2000)). That some might think or believe a law is un-Constitutional, or might violate their civil liberties, does not render that law in fact un-Constitutional (Clapper v. Amnesty International (2013)).
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #32
Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmhe was trying to tell me, earlier in the day, that he wasn't an anarchist
It sounds like you are projecting.
.
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Contumacious said:
“I am a Libertarian. I want NO government.”
You are ridiculous.
“I am a Libertarian. I want NO government.”
You are ridiculous.
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #34
Have you heard George Santayana's aphorism:
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it"?
You may want to look into it.
.
Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 55,527
- 16,970
- 2,250
If your claims had value, you could argue and demonstrate the value. Instead you've simply declared the value, and then posted link to people who agree with you. That's not a compelling argument. But in fact a series of logical fallacies. Which doesn't denote a particularly valuable claim.
Try again. Make your case for why we have 'tyranny' and why Americans are 'slaves'. If your argument is good, it will stand. If it isn't, you'll type the same claim again and demand we accept it as valid based on your ability to type.
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #36
The article provided an excellent factual background which you have chosen to ignore. What 's your agenda?
.
Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #37
Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 55,527
- 16,970
- 2,250
Have you even read your article? If so, tell us why it works.
Present your argument.
A conversation. And its like pulling teeth to get you to simply tell us what you believe and why you believe it. Or to back those claims up with reasoned arguments and evidence.
If you don't know why you believe as you believe, just say so. If you do know, then by all means share that with us. And offer us reasonable arguments to support those beliefs.
OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,884
- 265
She's placing that much cash in a personal account?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Donald Trump’s $10B Lawsuit Over Epstein Letter Dismissed by Federal Judge- Started by Senior
- Replies: 4
-
Gov. Hochul threatens to shut down free Catholic Hospice home- Started by theHawk
- Replies: 1
-
-
Bad news for moscow empire. Péter Magyar: We will do everything for oil - gas diversification- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 1
Latest Discussions
-
-
Let's face it: there's no good reason to deny the construction of the ballroom.
- Latest: OhPleaseJustQuit
-
-
