Koba (Stalin) : "Without lend-lease, we would've lost the war"

Litwin

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
56,763
Reaction score
8,368
Points
1,915
Location
GDL&Sweden
ANOTHER RED CZAR Nikita Khrushchev wrote in his memoirs. : "If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war,"

YOU CAN GET 10 YEARS IN PRISON for mentioning these facts in Muscovy today ....Moscow imperialists hate the reality ...

Muscovite organizers of the "Sieged Leningrad" exhibition are accused of "betraying their homeland." They displayed authentic (US the lend-lease) products consumed by the city's residents during the blockade, which turned out to be of the US origin and were supplied to the USSR´s Marxist Muscovite Empire under the lend-lease.



 
ANOTHER RED CZAR Nikita Khrushchev wrote in his memoirs. : "If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war,"

YOU CAN GET 10 YEARS IN PRISON for mentioning these facts in Muscovy today ....Moscow imperialists hate the reality ...

Muscovite organizers of the "Sieged Leningrad" exhibition are accused of "betraying their homeland." They displayed authentic (US the lend-lease) products consumed by the city's residents during the blockade, which turned out to be of the US origin and were supplied to the USSR´s Marxist Muscovite Empire under the lend-lease.




no doubt of that. without the convoys of lend lease equipment stalin might have lost long before d day.

conversely without the incredible loss of soviet life at stalingrad and elsewhere, we might all be lined up at the ovens.
 
no doubt of that.
YOU CAN GET 10 YEARS IN A PRISON for mentioning these facts in 🇷🇺 Muscovy today ....Moscow imperialists hate the reality ...

 
Churchill saved Moscow from falling by sending tanks to Stalin in time to defend Moscow. It was Churchill who talked FDR into the Lend-Lease convoys.
 
Stalin considered Georgia to be part of Asia, that's why he called himself Asian. The Soviet Union was a multiethnic state and it elected an Asiatic man as a party leader. Stalin would have opposed Georgia's EU bid.

main-qimg-abef433eae18c96c423d7d637e3adadf


The Russian Embassy acknowledged that the Lend-Lease Act contributed to the Soviet victory over Hitlerism. Churchill wanted to exploit Soviet troops as cannon fodder and he talked FDR into backing the Soviets.



Even before the United States entered World War II in December 1941, America sent arms and equipment to the Soviet Union to help it defeat the Nazi invasion. Totaling $11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today’s currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945 in support of what Stalin described to Roosevelt as the “enormous and difficult fight against the common enemy — bloodthirsty Hitlerism.”
 
Last edited:
It's true enough. Why does it come as a surprise to gen-idiots that Stalin was a partner in the U.S.'s effort to defeat the Nazi regime in WW2.
 
Another reason Stalin courted the Japanese is because their treaty allowed Stalin to bring in a million men experienced in cold weather combat to help defend Moscow and launch the winter offensives around Moscow with the 125 new British tanks sent by Churchill.

People tend to miss the fact that the Germans held on until the summer of 1943, when the Soviets finally had accumulated enough materiel to launch their first major breakout offensives at Kursk. It's as if all of 1942 and half of 1943 wasn't there. Holding on at Moscow and Stalingrad didn't defeat and drive back the Germans. That came much later.
 
Last edited:
Churchill saved Moscow from falling by sending tanks to Stalin in time to defend Moscow. It was Churchill who talked FDR into the Lend-Lease convoys.

yes, and dont forget about 1945 Churchill´s liberation of Eastern Europe plan




YOU CAN face 10 YEARS IN A PRISON for mentioning these facts in 🇷🇺 Muscovy today ....Moscow imperialists hate the reality ...
 
Stalin considered Georgia to be part of Asia, that's why he called himself Asian.
"Let us begin with this evident fact: Muscovy does not belong at all to Europe, but to Asia. It follows that judging Muscovy and the Muscovites by our European standards is a mistake to be avoided."—gonzague de reynold, 19501 In methodological terms, one should de-Europeanise any analysis of Muscovy policy.— thomas gomart, 20062 "
 
no doubt of that. without the convoys of lend lease equipment stalin might have lost long before d day.

conversely without the incredible loss of soviet life at stalingrad and elsewhere, we might all be lined up at the ovens.

US/GB massive amount of aid to STALIN´S totalitarian empire doesn't get enough credit, beyond the Luftwaffe, Germany Navy and Army units US/GB tied down or destroyed.

GQ9DMYEbwAAxdO5
 
Even before the United States entered World War II in December 1941, America sent arms and equipment to the Soviet Union to help it defeat the Nazi invasion. Totaling $11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today’s currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945 in support of what Stalin described to Roosevelt as the “enormous and difficult fight against the common enemy — bloodthirsty Hitlerism.”
The whining of the adherents “if not for the Lend-Lease the USSR lost in the fall of 1941” and their snot with tears smeared on their pale faces cannot stand criticism, but the anti-communist crap completely forgets how democratic European countries and super democratic USA supported the Third Reich in every possible way.

Thus Charles Higham in his work “Trading with the Enemy” notes: “Colonel Sosthenes Ben, head of the multinational american telephone corporation ITT, traveled from New York to Madrid and from there to Bern at the height of the war to assist the Nazis in improving the communications systems and guided bombs that were savagely destroying London.
Ball bearings, which were so lacking in american enterprises that produced military equipment, were sent to Latin American customers associated with the nazis. And this was done with the secret consent of the deputy chief of the U.S. military production department, who was also a business partner of a relative of Reichsmarshal Goering in Philadelphia.
It should be noted that Washington was well aware of all this and either approved or turned a blind eye to such actions.

For example, in 1944 Germany received 48,000 tons of American oil and 1,100 tons of tungsten through Francoist Spain every month.
In addition to trade, Western companies owned a hefty amount of property in Germany:
“the size of American holdings in Nazi
Germany by the time of the events at Pearl Harbor, amounted to approximately 475 million dollars.
Standard Oil's investment was estimated at.
120 million dollars; General Motors, $35 million; ITT, $30 million;
“Ford, $17.5 million.
Based on the fact that the U.S. was at war with the Axis countries, it would have been more patriotic for the American side to stop the activities of its companies in Germany, regardless of what the Nazis would do with them: nationalize them or merge them with Goering's industrial empire.
However, the pursuit of profit pushed for a cynical solution: to avoid confiscation by merging American enterprises into holding companies, whose profits would be transferred to American accounts in German banks and kept there until the end of the war,” Higham writes.

Dean Acheson, in a NBC radio program entitled “The State Department Speaks”, stated: “The U.S. is forced to sell oil to Spain because of a commission agreement reached with neutral countries in return for their promise to refrain from supplying the enemy with the goods it needs”.
Let me remind you that under the Lendliz agreement, in violation of the first protocol, the U.S. delivered to the USSR an insufficient number of trucks and many had problems related to the quality of bearings, which was pointed out by many mechanics.
And nevertheless at the time when american soldiers and sailors were dying from japanese bombs in Pearl Harbor, americann businessmen at their enterprises in occupied France assembled Ford trucks for Germany allied with Japan.
And there is no contradiction!
By the way, we should not forget the american aviation gasoline poured through Portugal in a wide river into nazi military equipment.
 
The whining of the adherents “if not for the Lend-Lease the USSR lost in the fall of 1941” and their snot with tears smeared on their pale faces cannot stand criticism, but the anti-communist crap completely forgets how democratic European countries and super democratic USA supported the Third Reich in every possible way.

Thus Charles Higham in his work “Trading with the Enemy” notes: “Colonel Sosthenes Ben, head of the multinational american telephone corporation ITT, traveled from New York to Madrid and from there to Bern at the height of the war to assist the Nazis in improving the communications systems and guided bombs that were savagely destroying London.
Ball bearings, which were so lacking in american enterprises that produced military equipment, were sent to Latin American customers associated with the nazis. And this was done with the secret consent of the deputy chief of the U.S. military production department, who was also a business partner of a relative of Reichsmarshal Goering in Philadelphia.
It should be noted that Washington was well aware of all this and either approved or turned a blind eye to such actions.

For example, in 1944 Germany received 48,000 tons of American oil and 1,100 tons of tungsten through Francoist Spain every month.
In addition to trade, Western companies owned a hefty amount of property in Germany:
“the size of American holdings in Nazi
Germany by the time of the events at Pearl Harbor, amounted to approximately 475 million dollars.
Standard Oil's investment was estimated at.
120 million dollars; General Motors, $35 million; ITT, $30 million;
“Ford, $17.5 million.
Based on the fact that the U.S. was at war with the Axis countries, it would have been more patriotic for the American side to stop the activities of its companies in Germany, regardless of what the Nazis would do with them: nationalize them or merge them with Goering's industrial empire.
However, the pursuit of profit pushed for a cynical solution: to avoid confiscation by merging American enterprises into holding companies, whose profits would be transferred to American accounts in German banks and kept there until the end of the war,” Higham writes.

Dean Acheson, in a NBC radio program entitled “The State Department Speaks”, stated: “The U.S. is forced to sell oil to Spain because of a commission agreement reached with neutral countries in return for their promise to refrain from supplying the enemy with the goods it needs”.
Let me remind you that under the Lendliz agreement, in violation of the first protocol, the U.S. delivered to the USSR an insufficient number of trucks and many had problems related to the quality of bearings, which was pointed out by many mechanics.
And nevertheless at the time when american soldiers and sailors were dying from japanese bombs in Pearl Harbor, americann businessmen at their enterprises in occupied France assembled Ford trucks for Germany allied with Japan.
And there is no contradiction!
By the way, we should not forget the american aviation gasoline poured through Portugal in a wide river into nazi military equipment.
1694687368269-jpeg.829165

1694607997757-jpeg.828788


1695011964172-jpeg.830842
 
15th post
ANOTHER RED CZAR Nikita Khrushchev wrote in his memoirs. : "If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war,"

YOU CAN GET 10 YEARS IN PRISON for mentioning these facts in Muscovy today ....Moscow imperialists hate the reality ...

Muscovite organizers of the "Sieged Leningrad" exhibition are accused of "betraying their homeland." They displayed authentic (US the lend-lease) products consumed by the city's residents during the blockade, which turned out to be of the US origin and were supplied to the USSR´s Marxist Muscovite Empire under the lend-lease.




Would have could have should have but didn't, :shutupsmiley:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom