How do you know, do you use cocaine?Stupid dipshit, do you think a visitor is going to LEAVE cocaine in the White House?
That stuff is expensive, no one LEAVES it anywhere.
What they do is STASH it, so they can come back and get it later
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you know, do you use cocaine?Stupid dipshit, do you think a visitor is going to LEAVE cocaine in the White House?
That stuff is expensive, no one LEAVES it anywhere.
What they do is STASH it, so they can come back and get it later
the poster i was responding to said it was in a public access entryWho "they", can you provide a link to an administration official saying it was in a restricted access area as opposed to a transient area?
Or are you going off sites like NewsMax, Washington Examiner, Gateway Pundit, etc. claiming something without support?
WW
one doesn’t have to use coke to know it’s expensiveHow do you know, do you use cocaine?
the poster i was responding to said it was in a public access entry
when i challenged him it’s funny he said the same thing you did
They let Donald Jr. back into the White House?
Why?
WW
link?
Too much of a fucking dullard to know when you're being mocked. huh?![]()
.
.
.
No disrespect intended, but the initial claim show above is just freaking stupid. So it got the level of response it deserved.
WW
I have no problem asking questions, as I have no problem answering them, but there are pejorative question setups, little traps for the unwary, that can and are avoided at times by simply not dignifying the question with an answer, as any answer would be used against, kind of like the old "have you quit beating your wife" question. There is no good answer that cannot be used against you, and no matter what anybody thinks of that white house press woman, her job is to manage those questions (along with others) without assisting in manufacturing liability for her organization, by her being a mouthpiece for that administration. Reporters do play games, and sometimes the most winning move is not to play.So it's your "responsibility" to trust your elected leaders, to shut up, and not ask any questions about the things they do? And to attempt to hold them responsible for their actions is "irresponsible"?
Ok, right.![]()
There’s a non-response if I’ve ever seen one. Somebody can be hypocritical and also correct you know.Leftards have no standing to talk about responsibility of any kind.
One kind of assumes, there is a surreptitiously placed camera covering everywhere in that place, since the Nixon Administration, but who knows.I've never been a cocaine user. Smoked a lot of pot in the 70s but never used any coke. I HAVE been around tweakers though and the Tik Tok balcony scene with the family had one on full display. Maybe the bag wasn't his, but the idea that the SS cannot figure out who brought that in is ridiculous.
prior to your post, you quoted me responding to a posterFollow back, the poster you responded to was me.
The "they" you appeared to refer to was someone in an official capacity changing the story.
So I ask again, who is "they" - as in an administration official - that claimed it was in a restricted access area not open to the public? (Open to the public meaning a high traffic area used by visitors, VIPs, military officials, staff, and WH employees transiting the area.)
WW
prior to your post, you quoted me responding to a poster
View attachment 802537
Correct, it goes back to this post.
Which where I then pointed out that being on the same level as the Situation Room doesn't mean the whole level has the same type of traffic as the Situation Room.
The very same article from NBC pointed out that the administration said that the area the small quantity (IIRC referred to as a "baggie") was in a more heavily trafficed area where visitors, VIPs, military, staff and WH employees transit.
WW
yes, confirming the poster i was responding to was wrong and still parroting the first lie from the adminView attachment 802537
Correct, it goes back to this post.
Which where I then pointed out that being on the same level as the Situation Room doesn't mean the whole level has the same type of traffic as the Situation Room.
The very same article from NBC pointed out that the administration said that the area the small quantity (IIRC referred to as a "baggie") was in a more heavily trafficed area where visitors, VIPs, military, staff and WH employees transit.
WW
I really think that you need to think very hard about getting a lifeIf Secret Service didn't claim it's their coke, and nobody else respects the president enough to claim it, then it becomes the Biden's coke. That's how it works for the rest of the country. This is yet another example of the liberal two tiered justice system, special rules for the liberal elite. Pathetic.
yes, confirming the poster i was responding to was wrong and still parroting the first lie from the admin