Kids have freedom of speech - should we give them all a gun?

[Billy000]

I already know the automatic republican reaction to this thread will be “kids don’t have freedom of speech!” Yes they do. How I know? Because no kid has ever been charged with a crime for speaking an opinion. Do they still face consequences? Obviously they do, but guess what assholes? So do adults. It’s not like you don’t face repercussions for telling that hot new intern she has a nice ass. You can get fired for that. The main takeaway is that you aren’t charged with a crime for telling her that.

The main takeaway of this post is that it is reasonable that the 2nd amendment has limitations like the 1st amendment has with slander and libel. This includes public security that helps to minimize gun violence.

 

[Nostra]

Yes, give all of them guns. Preferably AR-15 “machine guns”.

As soon as they can walk.

 

[Kosh]

If kids can pick their gender, they can carry a gun..

 

[JGalt]

Yes, give all of them guns. Preferably AR-15 “machine guns”.

As soon as they can walk.

I got to shoot a .44 mag when I was only 12.

 

[Augustine_]

Kids typically don't have the option of easily, efficiently and immediately killing each other. And so keeping guns away from them is unconstitutional.

 

[Nostra]

What about voting? Two year old kids have a right to vote.

 

[Augustine_]

What about voting? Two year old kids have a right to vote.

Adults who are more into make believe than children are allowed to vote, so why not?

 

[Billy000]

Yes, give all of them guns. Preferably AR-15 “machine guns”.

As soon as they can walk.

Good god. I know you don’t. That isn’t my point. I’m not saying you want this for kids. My point is, there is a legal precedence for limiting one of the Bill of Rights.

 

[Nostra]

Yes, give all of them guns. Preferably AR-15 “machine guns”.

As soon as they can walk.

Good god. I know you don’t. That isn’t my point. I’m not saying you want this for kids. My point is, there is a legal precedence for limiting one of the Bill of Rights.

Wrong. Give em guns.

 

[Billy000]

If kids can pick their gender, they can carry a gun..

They can huh?

 

[blackhawk]

The main takeaway of this post is that if the first amendment has limitations like preventing kids from buying gun,

That's the main takeaway the First Amendment prevents kids from buying a gun? I have not checked the gun laws of every state or all the federal gun laws but I'm pretty sure a minor can not leagally purchase a gun.

 

[Billy000]

The main takeaway of this post is that if the first amendment has limitations like preventing kids from buying gun,

That's the main takeaway the First Amendment prevents kids from buying a gun? I have not checked the gun laws of every state or all the federal gun laws but I'm pretty sure a minor can not leagally purchase a gun.

Lol I botched this post majorly but I have edited it to reflect the actual point I was trying to make.

And yes, kids can’t legally purchase a gun. The point I am trying to make that I admittedly failed at conveying is that if the 1st amendment has limitations like slander, the 2nd amendment can as well.

 

[deannalw]

Well you proved me wrong, billy.

I was confident you couldn't top the stupidity of your past posts but you proved you could do it quite handily.

 

[Jitss617]

I already know the automatic republican reaction to this thread will be “kids don’t have freedom of speech!” Yes they do. How I know? Because no kid has ever been charged with a crime for speaking an opinion. Do they still face consequences? Obviously they do, but guess what assholes? So do adults. It’s not like you don’t face repercussions for telling that hot new intern she has a nice ass. You can get fired for that. The main takeaway is that you aren’t charged with a crime for telling her that.

The main takeaway of this post is that it is reasonable that the 2nd amendment has limitations like the 1st amendment has with slander and libel. This includes public security that helps to minimize gun violence.

You don’t have to live here

 

[Billy000]

Yes, give all of them guns. Preferably AR-15 “machine guns”.

As soon as they can walk.

I got to shoot a .44 mag when I was only 12.

I shot a .22 at 8 but no one should actually give a shit.

 

[fncceo]

Hell yeah!

 

[Billy000]

Hell yeah!

Omg I am so triggered by this! A little girl should never go near a gun. EVER. You’re a bad, bad man for posting this!

Is that what you wanted to hear?

 

[blackhawk]

The main takeaway of this post is that if the first amendment has limitations like preventing kids from buying gun,

That's the main takeaway the First Amendment prevents kids from buying a gun? I have not checked the gun laws of every state or all the federal gun laws but I'm pretty sure a minor can not leagally purchase a gun.

Lol I botched this post majorly but I have edited it to reflect the actual point I was trying to make.

And yes, kids can’t legally purchase a gun. The point I am trying to make that I admittedly failed at conveying is that if the 1st amendment has limitations like slander, the 2nd amendment can as well.

The Second Amendment does have limitations.

 

[fncceo]

Hell yeah!

Omg I am so triggered by this! A little girl should never go near a gun. EVER. You’re a bad, bad man for posting this!

Is that what you wanted to hear?

So sweet of you to say.

 

[Billy000]

The main takeaway of this post is that if the first amendment has limitations like preventing kids from buying gun,

That's the main takeaway the First Amendment prevents kids from buying a gun? I have not checked the gun laws of every state or all the federal gun laws but I'm pretty sure a minor can not leagally purchase a gun.

Lol I botched this post majorly but I have edited it to reflect the actual point I was trying to make.

And yes, kids can’t legally purchase a gun. The point I am trying to make that I admittedly failed at conveying is that if the 1st amendment has limitations like slander, the 2nd amendment can as well.

The Second Amendment does have limitations.

So why shouldn’t it have more for the sake of public security?