Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns Right To Free Speech Could Lead To People Speaking Freely

[Votto]

Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns Right To Free Speech Could Lead To People Speaking Freely​

U.S.·Mar 18, 2024 · BabylonBee.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With oral arguments taking place before the United States Supreme Court regarding online censorship, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a grave warning that the right to free speech would mean people could speak freely.

As the nation's highest court considers whether the federal government can limit free speech on social media platforms, Justice Jackson expressed alarm at the potential for the First Amendment provision of free speech to allow people to actually say whatever they want.

"This is a very dangerous idea," Jackson said. "Having the right to free speech plainly written into the Constitution could set a frightening precedent that would let people in this country, like say whatever they want. What if someone wants to say a bad thing that I hate? The founders clearly did not anticipate this when they wrote the Bill of Rights."

Jackson continued to explain her concern as several other justices on the court reportedly proceeded to look at their copies of the U.S. Constitution, then back at Jackson, then back at the Constitution, and back at Jackson.

"I mean, what if someone is saying something dangerous? Or sharing an incorrect meme?" Jackson asked. "What then? Shouldn't the government be able to stop that? It's not like it's a ‘right,' is it? Next thing you know, people will be saying the Constitution gives them the right to own guns. Ridiculous."

At publishing time, arguments had to be suspended to give Justice Jackson an opportunity to read a 2nd-grade history textbook about The Constitution.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns Right To Free Speech Could Lead To People Speaking Freely​

U.S.·Mar 18, 2024 · BabylonBee.com

View attachment 1170527

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With oral arguments taking place before the United States Supreme Court regarding online censorship, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a grave warning that the right to free speech would mean people could speak freely.

As the nation's highest court considers whether the federal government can limit free speech on social media platforms, Justice Jackson expressed alarm at the potential for the First Amendment provision of free speech to allow people to actually say whatever they want.

"This is a very dangerous idea," Jackson said. "Having the right to free speech plainly written into the Constitution could set a frightening precedent that would let people in this country, like say whatever they want. What if someone wants to say a bad thing that I hate? The founders clearly did not anticipate this when they wrote the Bill of Rights."

Jackson continued to explain her concern as several other justices on the court reportedly proceeded to look at their copies of the U.S. Constitution, then back at Jackson, then back at the Constitution, and back at Jackson.

"I mean, what if someone is saying something dangerous? Or sharing an incorrect meme?" Jackson asked. "What then? Shouldn't the government be able to stop that? It's not like it's a ‘right,' is it? Next thing you know, people will be saying the Constitution gives them the right to own guns. Ridiculous."

At publishing time, arguments had to be suspended to give Justice Jackson an opportunity to read a 2nd-grade history textbook about The Constitution.

.

Unless it's women who are speaking freely. Then she'll just lose it and start accusing people of expecting her to be a biologist!

.

 

[marvin martian]

Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns Right To Free Speech Could Lead To People Speaking Freely​

U.S.·Mar 18, 2024 · BabylonBee.com

View attachment 1170527

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With oral arguments taking place before the United States Supreme Court regarding online censorship, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a grave warning that the right to free speech would mean people could speak freely.

As the nation's highest court considers whether the federal government can limit free speech on social media platforms, Justice Jackson expressed alarm at the potential for the First Amendment provision of free speech to allow people to actually say whatever they want.

"This is a very dangerous idea," Jackson said. "Having the right to free speech plainly written into the Constitution could set a frightening precedent that would let people in this country, like say whatever they want. What if someone wants to say a bad thing that I hate? The founders clearly did not anticipate this when they wrote the Bill of Rights."

Jackson continued to explain her concern as several other justices on the court reportedly proceeded to look at their copies of the U.S. Constitution, then back at Jackson, then back at the Constitution, and back at Jackson.

"I mean, what if someone is saying something dangerous? Or sharing an incorrect meme?" Jackson asked. "What then? Shouldn't the government be able to stop that? It's not like it's a ‘right,' is it? Next thing you know, people will be saying the Constitution gives them the right to own guns. Ridiculous."

At publishing time, arguments had to be suspended to give Justice Jackson an opportunity to read a 2nd-grade history textbook about The Constitution.

She's also very confused about a large segment of the population going around calling themselves "women".

"What does that mean?", she asks.

 

[toobfreak]

Ketanji Brown Jackson​

View attachment 1170527

^^^^^^^ DEI hire.

 

[Concerned American]

Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns Right To Free Speech Could Lead To People Speaking Freely​

U.S.·Mar 18, 2024 · BabylonBee.com

View attachment 1170527

WASHINGTON, D.C. — With oral arguments taking place before the United States Supreme Court regarding online censorship, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a grave warning that the right to free speech would mean people could speak freely.

As the nation's highest court considers whether the federal government can limit free speech on social media platforms, Justice Jackson expressed alarm at the potential for the First Amendment provision of free speech to allow people to actually say whatever they want.

"This is a very dangerous idea," Jackson said. "Having the right to free speech plainly written into the Constitution could set a frightening precedent that would let people in this country, like say whatever they want. What if someone wants to say a bad thing that I hate? The founders clearly did not anticipate this when they wrote the Bill of Rights."

Jackson continued to explain her concern as several other justices on the court reportedly proceeded to look at their copies of the U.S. Constitution, then back at Jackson, then back at the Constitution, and back at Jackson.

"I mean, what if someone is saying something dangerous? Or sharing an incorrect meme?" Jackson asked. "What then? Shouldn't the government be able to stop that? It's not like it's a ‘right,' is it? Next thing you know, people will be saying the Constitution gives them the right to own guns. Ridiculous."

At publishing time, arguments had to be suspended to give Justice Jackson an opportunity to read a 2nd-grade history textbook about The Constitution.

Votto, you drive me nuts. IDK how many times you've gotten me with BB or Political Satire. The bad thing about it is they are so close to being true that it is difficult to not believe them whole hog. LOL

 

[Doc7505]

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Refers to Black Americans as ‘Disabled’ During Supreme Court Hearing​

Justice Jackson Refers to Black Americans as 'Disabled' in SCOTUS Hearing

During a SCOTUS hearing on Wednesday, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson seemed to liken black Americans to Americans with disabilities.

www.breitbart.com

16 Oct 2025 ~~ By John Binder

During a hearing at the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) involving whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson seemed to liken black Americans to Americans with disabilities.
The case, known as Louisiana v. Callais, considers whether Louisiana’s congressional map — which includes two majority-black districts — violates the 15th Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Plaintiffs in the case argue that the congressional map is unconstitutionally gerrymandered based on race.
During the hearing, Justice Jackson seemed to contend that black American voters are equivalent to Americans with physical disabilities.
“So going back to this discriminatory intent point, I guess I’m thinking of it, of the fact that remedial action absent discriminatory intent is really not a new idea in the civil rights laws. And my kind of paradigmatic example of this is something like the ADA [Americans with Disabilities Act],” Jackson said.
She continued:

Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act against the backdrop of a world that was generally not accessible to people with disabilities. And so it was discriminatory in effect because these folks were not able to access these buildings. And it didn’t matter whether the person who built the building or the person who owned the building intended for them to be exclusionary; that’s irrelevant. Congress said, the facilities have to be made equally open to people with disabilities if readily possible. I guess I don’t understand why that’s not what’s happening here. [Emphasis added]​

The idea in Section 2 is that we are responding to current-day manifestations of past and present decisions that disadvantage minorities and make it so that they don’t have equal access to the voting system. Right? They’re disabled. In fact ,we use the word ‘disabled’ in [Milliken v. Bradley]. We say that’s a way in which these processes are not equally open. So I don’t understand why it matters whether the state intended to do that. What Congress is saying is if it is happening … you gotta fix it. [Emphasis added]​

Commentary:
Ketanji Brown Jackson is without a doubt the lamest of DEI hires ever forced upon the United States and the Supreme Court by DSA Marxists. It's disgusting racist trolling, even towards her own race..