I will ASSUME you work in a bus. that provides you with information that may lead to inside trading strictures?
I work for a financial firm. Even if I worked in a "bus", it doesn't matter. If that's the contract and I signed it..I have to adhere to it.
Trajan said:
how so? and please, read my post ...again.
What did I get wrong?
you appear to read and retain what you want and discard snippets of my posts.....
I said, in my first post that is may be
correct but I donÂ’t see it as
'right' in that how can they legally tell him not to donate , period? If it s a disclosure issue, fine, which would mean he can, but has to tell them first.........I said that the link appears or that is the information appears contradictory in that there is a paucity of factual contract information that may clear this up, to wit; they say they don't prohibit it, yet say he needs to tell them first, what would be the point if except for the disclosure issue, where in my opinion on this being ‘right’, surfaces. What possible issue could there be if he donates then tells them, period?
They cannot by law tell him not to. But yes, yes if he signed a contract saying so I am wondering why he would do that, I wouldn’t, UNLESS they said they just want to keep track so they can say yes he does the “news’ and the network (nbc) discloses he is a democratic sppter. to defray any unknown conflict of interest.
Griffin's statement underscores that it was Olbermann's failure to obtain approval, and not the actual political donations, that prompted the suspension.
Its sounds stupid, so he did it, told them afterward and now they suspend him ( if he never told them well, that different, but he did) ...I think there is more to it than that.