This Swetnick **** gave 4 names to NBC, 1said he never heard of Swetnick, another is dead and 2 others wouldn’t respond to NBC.
Seems legit!
Atrended HS parties, watched girs get raped, never reported it, got raped, never reported it, went back - attended more parties.
Yeah, right.
History of trouble, attempted to blackmail a bad, restraining order by an ex because she threatened to kill his wife and children...
I'm sure snowflakes will claim, just like with Ford, that her testimony is very 'credible'...
By now, everyone should know that Swetnick sexually harassed two male co-workers, then she filed a false retaliatory claim against her accusers claiming they sexually harassed her. The employer determined the claim against Swetnick was valid (there were witnesses) but her claim against her accusers was unfounded. When Swetnick made public comments against her employer, the company sued her in court for defamation; however, the lawsuit was quickly dismissed.. Everyone should also know that she committed unemployment fraud and falsified her resume claiming work experience which she did not have and a college degree which she did not have. But there is even more to this woman that proves she is a compulsive liar.
“Swetnick was on the other side of a civil case in 1994, as a plaintiff, when she filed a personal injury lawsuit in Maryland against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. She claimed she lost more than $420,000 in earnings after she hurt her nose in a fall on a train in 1992.
“Swetnick, who described herself in court records as a model and actor, claimed she had "numerous modeling commitments" with several companies at the time of the accident but missed out them because of her injuries.
“To support her claim for lost wages, Swetnick named "Konam Studios" as one of the companies promising to employ her. A court filing identified Nam Ko, a representative of "Kunam Studios," as a possible plaintiff's witness for her case.
“Ko, however, told AP on Friday that he was just a friend of Swetnick's and that he had never owned a company with a name spelled either way and had never agreed to pay her money for any work before she injured her nose. He said he first met Swetnick at a bar more than a year after her alleged accident.”
“Court records show Swetnick's lawsuit against the transit agency was dismissed in 1997 after a settlement was reached. Vincent Jankoski, one of the lawyers who defended the agency, said the case was resolved without paying Swetnick any money after she failed to provide documentation supporting her lost-wage claims.”
Third Kavanaugh accuser has history of legal disputes
NOTE: Some posters erroneously believe that the Webtrends filed a claim of sexual harassment against Swetnick and since the charges were dismissed she must be innocent of sexual harassment. This is not true. The lawsuit was about defamation, not sexual harassment. The company stands by its findings and Swetnick never pursued her claim against her accusers.
CONCLUSION: Anyone who believes anything this woman says is a fool.